J6 hearings not be doing that well? ... CREW to Sue

[BackAgain]

Our resident assclown libtard Trump haters probably don’t even understand that the former President has not been charged with a crime.

 

[BackAgain]

Not too much, though, really. Certainly not more than you, apparently. Maybe switch to decaf.

Your all worked up again, Farty.

 

[BackAgain]

Rules are rules. You always seem to have an excuse at the ready for why Trump should be allowed to break them.

Poor Farty. He clearly didn’t know what the “rules” are when he posted this nonsense.

Libtards can’t help being libtarded.

 

[Catman51]

Not too much, though, really. Certainly not more than you, apparently.

It's illegitimate, and it's typical, scummy Trump behavior. Not really big news, I agree. Expected scummy behavior.

And you would be the expert on scummy behavior, just witness all of your posts.

 

[Lastamender]

Good. Trump is not above the law no matter how much you worship him. I hope they get a nice fat fine

Comey, McCabe, Brennan, Clapper and Fauci are. So far Hunter is too.

 

[Lastamender]

Those to. But it was displayed on golf carts as well. It was done by design.

I get that since it was Trump you are not allowed to say anything about it, but it is a cheap use of the presidential seal and we should not allow it.

Now, time for you to shove your head back up Trump's ass.

But influence peddling is just fine. That what Biden has done and is still doing,

 

[Billy_Bob]

Yeah. Genius. Crucial stuff like that is what keeps your attention

You’ve got him THIS time!

But just to help your peevish little petty mind, it seems pretty FUCKING unlikely that a former President’s golf cart symbol violates the Federal Law:

18 U.S. Code § 713 - Use of likenesses of the great seal of the United States, the seals of the President and Vice President, the seal of the United States Senate, the seal of the United States House of Representatives, and the seal of the United States Congress​

(a)Whoever knowingly displays any printed or other likeness of the great seal of the United States, or of the seals of the President or the Vice President of the United States, or the seal of the United States Senate, or the seal of the United States House of Representatives, or the seal of the United States Congress, or any facsimile thereof, in, or in connection with, any advertisement, poster, circular, book, pamphlet, or other publication, public meeting, play, motion picture, telecast, or other production, or on any building, monument, or stationery, for the purpose of conveying, or in a manner reasonably calculated to convey, a false impression of sponsorship or approval by the Government of the United States or by any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.

Trump is allowed, as an ex-president, to use the seal. LOL the left is barking up another tree... We got him now episode.... we've lost count....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Trump is allowed, as an ex-president, to use the seal.

He sure isn't.

 

[BackAgain]

Trump is allowed, as an ex-president, to use the seal. LOL the left is barking up another tree... We got him now episode.... we've lost count....

The libtards are mindnumb hate-filled trolls.

I wouldn’t nominate Trump for sainthood. But I would vote for him to get re-elected.

As for Brandon. I wouldn’t want him nominated for sainthood by anybody. He is a vile scumbag of a person. But I absolutely couldn’t vote for him to get re-elected.

 

[Billy_Bob]

He sure isn't.

Clueless as usual....

 

[BackAgain]

He sure isn't.

Says Farty ^, proving he doesn’t know a damn thing he’s talking about.

 

[Magnus]

Then there is the case for Democrat 'sticky fingers' going back to the Clinton's, if not earlier;

Clinton's Return White House Furniture​

...
W A S H I N G T O N, Feb. 8, 2001 -- Former President Clinton and his wife, Sen.Hillary Rodham Clinton, have sent $28,000 worth of household goods back to Washington after questions arose over whether the items were intended as personal gifts or donations to the White House.

“We have been informed that it is being shipped back, and the National Park Service is ready to receive it, take possession of it and take custody of it,” Jim McDaniel, the National Park Service’s liaison to the White House, said Wednesday.

“The property is being returned to government custody until such time that the issues can be resolved. It may well turn outthat that property is rightly the personal property of the Clinton's.”

Giving Back

After they were criticized for taking $190,000 worth of china,flatware, rugs, televisions, sofas and other gifts with them when they left, the Clintons announced last week that they would pay for$86,000 worth of gifts, or nearly half the amount.
...

Clintons Return White House Furniture

abcnews.go.com

But…but Bill Clinton

 

[Stryder50]

He sure isn't.

Excerpt from US Code cited in post #39;
... for the purpose of conveying, or in a manner reasonably calculated to convey, a false impression of sponsorship or approval by the Government of the United States or by any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.
...
It's not clear how this is done to suggest "sponsorship or approval by the Government of the United States" for a golf tournament.

 

[Stryder50]

But…but Bill Clinton

But...but Donald Trump

Gate swings both ways clueless.
More recent would be Hillary, not Bill.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Excerpt from US Code cited in post #39;
... for the purpose of conveying, or in a manner reasonably calculated to convey, a false impression of sponsorship or approval by the Government of the United States or by any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.
...
It's not clear how this is done to suggest "sponsorship or approval by the Government of the United States" for a golf tournament.

It's a hope and poke... They are hoping this will stick, what's going to happen is they are going to get poked in the ass... Again... The desperation is dripping from these left tards...

 

[Stryder50]

No, they didn't. They didn't understand which were donations to them and which were donations to the white house. The moment they were told, they returned it. That's not stealing. Stealing is what your orange lard and master did.

They hauled off goods and thought they were entitled to such. Only after they were told it was a no-no and some hagling ensued, did they return and/or pay for most of it.

It's not like either Bill or Hillary destroyed computer hard-drives with sensitive and classified government communications on such, to avoid being used in evidence, which would be a more serious offense. Oh wait ....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

They hauled off goods and thought they were entitled to such. Only after they were told it was a no-no and some hagling ensued, did they return and/or pay for most of it.

It's not like either Bill or Hillary destroyed computer hard-drives with sensitive and classified government communications on such, to avoid being used in evidence, which would be a more serious offense. Oh wait ....

Wait, I thought the guy investigating that said: no charges?

You got your 15 minutes. Here is the result:

 

[Billy_Bob]

Wait, I thought the guy investigating that said: no charges?

You got your 15 minutes. Here is the result:

You missed the words "may have".... meaning no charges have been filed... GFY retard..

 

[San Souci]

Good. Trump is not above the law no matter how much you worship him. I hope they get a nice fat fine

I would rather have the Chinese rule us than filthy Democrat traitors.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Excerpt from US Code cited in post #39;
... for the purpose of conveying, or in a manner reasonably calculated to convey, a false impression of sponsorship or approval by the Government of the United States or by any department, agency, or instrumentality thereof, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than six months, or both.
...
It's not clear how this is done to suggest "sponsorship or approval by the Government of the United States" for a golf tournament.

If you went to tournament and saw Coke signs all over the place, you could logically conclude there was a sponsorship there.

If you went to tournament and saw Marine signs all over the place, you could logically conclude there was a sponsorship there.

If you went to tournament and saw Air Force signs all over the place, you could logically conclude there was a sponsorship there.

Same holds true for seeing the presidential seal