Jack Smith could face indictment

Im soooo glad i walked you into saying this. I knew you would.

Do you know why McCarthy hasnt called for it? Because he doesnt want another sham impeachment. He wants it to be done by the books. I know that is a foreign concept to you. Democrats dont give two shits about integrity.

LOLOLOL

You go from saying in one post they'll just impeach Biden even if there's no evidence of a crime ... to McCarthy doesn't want a sham impeachment.

And both are lies anyway.

The real reason he hasn't called for a vote to impeach is because he knows he doesn't have the votes for it to pass. There are enough moderate Republicans in the House who will not vote for it based on the current "evidence," which is non-existent. That's why he signaled opening an impeachment inquiry. But he still hasn't and now they're out on recess until next month.

And the ones against Trump were by the book. One was for soliciting a foreign national to open an investigation into his political rival; while the other were for his attempt to prevent the peaceful transfer of power. Both were an abuse of office.
 
LOLOLOL

You go from saying in one post they'll just impeach Biden even if there's no evidence of a crime ... to McCarthy doesn't want a sham impeachment.

And both are lies anyway.

The real reason he hasn't called for a vote to impeach is because he knows he doesn't have the votes for it to pass. There are enough moderate Republicans in the House who will not vote for it based on the current "evidence," which is non-existent. That's why he signaled opening an impeachment inquiry. But he still hasn't and now they're out on recess until next month.

And the ones against Trump were by the book. One was for soliciting a foreign national to open an investigation into his political rival; while the other were for his attempt to prevent the peaceful transfer of power. Both were an abuse of office.
No, you compile ALL the evidence before impeaching. Thats how a responsible government works. We arent even half way done with the investigation yet.
 
No, you compile ALL the evidence before impeaching. Thats how a responsible government works. We arent even half way done with the investigation yet.

And you still have nothing. Which is why you don't have enough Republicans to impeach.

:dance:
 
And you still have nothing. Which is why you don't have enough Republicans to impeach.

:dance:
No, youre totally right. Nothing more is coming. Joe is perfectly safe now. You should definitely not pick a different candidate now while you still can. :laugh:
 
No, youre totally right. Nothing more is coming. Joe is perfectly safe now. You should definitely not pick a different candidate now while you still can. :laugh:

More lies from you. I never once said y'all won't actually find something on him.

Sad how weak your position is, it crumbles in every post you offer.
 
More lies from you. I never once said y'all won't actually find something on him.

Sad how weak your position is, it crumbles in every post you offer.
So if you think we are going to find more, and WE think we are going to find more, why would we call for an impeachment NOW? Why wouldnt we wait until your shit party and shit media can no longer deny it?
 
Hell, soon Mexico will be safer than America even if your hero Oompa Loompa becomes President again!

"Even if"?

So you're admitting the border is more secure when Big T's in the White House.

Got it.
 
Pussy bitch jack smiths made up crimes is not a criminal statute. A criminal statute is something law makers vote on. No jack smith bull shit

Nope, he cited 3 criminal statutes which apply to the 4 charges in the indictment.

It's all in there. To answer your question, all you have to do is look in it. Sucks being as brain-dead as you are.
 
So if you think we are going to find more, and WE think we are going to find more, why would we call for an impeachment NOW? Why wouldnt we wait until your shit party and shit media can no longer deny it?

You're retarded. There simply is no other explanation for your posts.

Moron, not saying they won't find dirt him ≠ to saying the will find dirt on him. It's merely not predicting something which hasn't happened yet and may never happen. Not to mention, y'all haven't got anything concrete on him yet, so if you do find something, it won't be, "more." :eusa_doh:

Don't you ever tire of making a fool of yourself on here? Seems not as you keep doing it.
 
You're retarded. There simply is no other explanation for your posts.

Moron, not saying they won't find dirt him ≠ to saying the will find dirt on him. It's merely not predicting something which hasn't happened yet and may never happen. Not to mention, y'all haven't got anything concrete on him yet, so if you do find something, it won't be, "more." :eusa_doh:

Don't you ever tire of making a fool of yourself on here? Seems not as you keep doing it.
Why do you ask them any questions at all?

These are the same fools that believe life was much better when Trump was pretending to be King for a day, so they believe Oompa Loompa is innocent no matter what.

Hell, Trump could say he is guilty and they will call him a liar!
 

Forum List

Back
Top