Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which person do I support that has been convicted of sedition?
Why would I have to say anything about supporting those who committed sedition? It should go without saying that it is innocent until proven guilty.You said nothing about being /convicted/ of sedition, you accused others of supporting seditious traitors and no one has been convicted for seditious treason, so, all your liars on J6 who knew the facts and concealed them to effect a failed political agenda are easily just as guilty as are you for playing stupid word games..
So then you were talking out of your ass yet again when you accused others of supporting seditious traitors.Why would I have to say anything about supporting those who committed sedition? It should go without saying that it is innocent until proven guilty.
And neither is anyone else, you pinhead moron. But thanks for admitting you were talking out of your ass. Busted.Those I support haven't been convicted of sedition so you are talking out your ass.
You nailed it.My prediction is that Carlson is going to have a lot of footage of rioters not doing anything particularly violent. Then he's going to complain about the media portraying as highly violent when they were only a little violent.
Nah, that's a stupid lie you are regurgitating because some paid right wing liar spoon fed it to you.Contributory issues do discern”from” versus “with” and lib loons are applying that for this but refused to do so for Covid
Multiple people in this thread have defended the actions that took place by the crowd at the capital on Jan 6.So then you were talking out of your ass yet again when you accused others of supporting seditious traitors.
And neither is anyone else, you pinhead moron. But thanks for admitting you were talking out of your ass. Busted.
Since many were convicted of sedition
Post 36.Really? Name them.
Post 36.
Really? Name them.
What case is Tucker trying to make with his video "evidence"?
Says you, a lying leftard without a medical degree or a science background.Clearly caused by the trauma of being assaulted by protestors.
We may be talking about two different things but I'll cover them both.What? You too lazy to link me there? Which thread, idiot? Post 36 of this thread has no mention of anyone convicted of sedition. But I just looked it up: the longest sentence anyone has gotten so far was 5 years and it was for using a fire extinguisher against cops and throwing boards at them as felony assault using a dangerous weapon. Sucks to be you again--- a liar an idiot and a sham.
www.justice.gov
The reliable source I am talking about might not lead the market in ratings but should still make a profit.Not sure I agree. If you look at the top 10 cable TV news shows, they are all filled with nothing but opinion and lies. It is why talk radio thrives.
It is what the people want.
Notice that a great many people stopped watching FoxNews when they stopped being to openly biased in favor of Trump.
People like being told what they already think is true.
Says you, a lying leftard without a medical degree or a science background.
Why do you LIARS lie so much?
Because NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN never do the same thing.Took him a while to get them edited to show what he wants them to show.
nypost.com
These are all fake news sources.Because NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN never do the same thing.
He is using video from the US Capitol not video he created. This isn’t CBS and Dan Rather using forged documents to try and sway an election or NBC News using redacted calls to Police from George Zimmerman.Tucker does not deal in facts, his own employer said so in a court of law.
