LeftofLeft
Diamond Member
- Oct 18, 2011
- 23,108
- 13,478
- 1,405
They are biased news sources that deny they are biased.These are all fake news sources.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They are biased news sources that deny they are biased.These are all fake news sources.
Is Tucker Carlson biased?They are biased news sources that deny they are biased.
Until now, we only saw a few edited hours out of the 41,000 hours that the far left wanted us to see.And now we are just getting the edited ones that Tucker wants.
Why can they not just put them all on a pubic server for us all to watch for ourselves?
He showed video from the US Capitol Police just like his counterparts at the other networks did. Either they all are biased or none are biased.Is Tucker Carlson biased?
I know you are biased.Is Tucker Carlson biased?
How about you watch Tucker and find out?
Right, he's cherry picking and lying to misrepresent the events of that day, as the capital police chief informed us.He is using video from the US Capitol not video he created. This isn’t CBS and Dan Rather using forged documents to try and sway an election or NBC News using redacted calls to Police from George Zimmerman.
Right....bloody brilliant!He showed video from the US Capitol Police just like his counterparts at the other networks did. Either they all are biased or none are biased.
What a sad and lazy minded pile of crap that is.He showed video from the US Capitol Police just like his counterparts at the other networks did. Either they all are biased or none are biased.
Why not answer the question?I know you are biased.
No it wasn't a problem.The peaceful protesting wasn't the problem.
Is bias a binary thing? Could someone be more biased and less biased?He showed video from the US Capitol Police just like his counterparts at the other networks did. Either they all are biased or none are biased.
Cherry picking does not change dichotomy of the event and the video shown raises a lot of questions; the obvious being “who did not want US to see these videos?”No need to Slither
Right, he's cherry picking and lying to misrepresent the events of that day, as the capital police chief informed us.
The tapes don’t lie unless they were redacted or corrupted. Show US how and when he did that here??Right....bloody brilliant!
The Commission did so to establish a case, supported by eyewitness testimony.
TuckTuck mined 40k hrs of tape for the most benign looking clips, accompanied by his nasal whine.
Not denying the violent protests occurred. With the threat intelligence leading up to the event, why wasn’t the Hill put on locked down? Why and how are Capitol Police escorting suspicious individuals further into the Capitol when our Democracy is being threatened? Why don’t you people want those questions answered?What a sad and lazy minded pile of crap that is.
The peaceful protesting wasn't the problem. The violence and the insurrection was the problem. Cherry picking out calm points doesn't mean those things didn't happen.
how is showing video a bias? Was the video corrupted?Is bias a binary thing? Could someone be more biased and less biased?
There is no dichotomy.Cherry picking does not change dichotomy of the event and the video shown raises a lot of questions; the obvious being “who did not want US to see these videos?”
He didn’t just show video, did he. He injected his interpretation of what was going on.how is showing video a bias? Was the video corrupted?
Nah, just pointing out your poor education. It’s evidence of your general stupidity, tbh.No. Sedition is a crime. Dummy is just what blaster is.
It's cute how you ignore all the grammar errors by your fellow tribe members in this thread but somehow decide to to address mine.
Your reply is typical of trumpers' selective bias; avoid the issue and attack the messenger.