Japan Absolutely REFUSES To Let In Syrian ‘Refugees’, says it must look after its own citizens FIRST

[theHawk]

Japan is known to be one of the most racist countries on earth .

There the lib goes. Can't refute the argument so he calls them racist.

They are a very xenophobic culture. They don't want anyone who is not Japanese getting citizenship.

That's not "xenophobia", it's called preserving your own culture and not accepting the lie of multiculturalism.

 

[theHawk]

Japan has the right idea. They know they need to take care of their own first. They are willing to send money so the refugees can be helped elsewhere. And where they should be helped is in Arab countries.

Soros is behind the protests against the ban on refugees. Soros wants open borders and one world government, something the left denied for years. There are some extremely radical people now in the U.S. who support Soros's idea and are willing to do anything to make it reality. While the majority of people support the refugee ban, the minority who is out there protesting are getting all the attention from media.

We need to take care of our own first. Starbucks announced that they'll hire 10,000 refugees. Not like all Americans already have jobs but they will favor the non-English speaking refugees. I hope people boycott them.

We can't afford to bring more people here when we have homeless people. Why does the left favor hurting our own just to go along with Soros's radical vision?


"UNITED NATIONS – Japan’s prime minister said Tuesday that his nation needs to attend to its own demographic challenges posed by falling birth rates and an aging population before opening its doors to refugees.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced at the U.N. General Assembly that Japan is ramping up assistance in response to the exodus of refugees to Europe from the Middle East and Africa.

He said Japan will provide $1.5 billion in emergency aid for refugees and for stabilization of communities facing upheaval. But speaking to reporters later Tuesday he poured cold water on the idea of Japan opening its doors to those fleeing.

“I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities by women, by elderly people and we must raise (the) birth rate. There are many things that we should do before accepting immigrants”

– Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

He said Japan first needed to attend to domestic challenges which he proposes to tackle under a revamped economic policy that aims to boost GDP to a post-war record level, while bolstering the social security system to support families.

“As an issue of demography, I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities…"

Japan Absolutely REFUSES To Let In Syrian ‘Refugees’, says it must look after its own citizens FIRST - Freedom's Final Stand

There problem here is that Japan didn't go to war in Iraq, Japan didn't destablize the Middle East region. Japan didn't support rebels in Syria. Therefore Japan has every right not to let people in.

The US on the other hand.....

The US didn't destabilize the Middle East either, their own inhabitants have a way of doing that on their own. Even if we did, it doesn't mean we give up the right to choose who we allow to immigrate into our country.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Japan has the right idea. They know they need to take care of their own first. They are willing to send money so the refugees can be helped elsewhere. And where they should be helped is in Arab countries.

Soros is behind the protests against the ban on refugees. Soros wants open borders and one world government, something the left denied for years. There are some extremely radical people now in the U.S. who support Soros's idea and are willing to do anything to make it reality. While the majority of people support the refugee ban, the minority who is out there protesting are getting all the attention from media.

We need to take care of our own first. Starbucks announced that they'll hire 10,000 refugees. Not like all Americans already have jobs but they will favor the non-English speaking refugees. I hope people boycott them.

We can't afford to bring more people here when we have homeless people. Why does the left favor hurting our own just to go along with Soros's radical vision?


"UNITED NATIONS – Japan’s prime minister said Tuesday that his nation needs to attend to its own demographic challenges posed by falling birth rates and an aging population before opening its doors to refugees.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced at the U.N. General Assembly that Japan is ramping up assistance in response to the exodus of refugees to Europe from the Middle East and Africa.

He said Japan will provide $1.5 billion in emergency aid for refugees and for stabilization of communities facing upheaval. But speaking to reporters later Tuesday he poured cold water on the idea of Japan opening its doors to those fleeing.

“I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities by women, by elderly people and we must raise (the) birth rate. There are many things that we should do before accepting immigrants”

– Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

He said Japan first needed to attend to domestic challenges which he proposes to tackle under a revamped economic policy that aims to boost GDP to a post-war record level, while bolstering the social security system to support families.

“As an issue of demography, I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities…"

Japan Absolutely REFUSES To Let In Syrian ‘Refugees’, says it must look after its own citizens FIRST - Freedom's Final Stand

All americans are refugees or migrants.
Category:American people of Syrian descent - Wikipedia

_______________________________

This inane, repetitive, ridiculous, response DOES NOT justify allowing, or in Obama's case, promoting, an illegal Invasion from Mexico.

When you Bolshevik/Democrats realize that you, may start to win an election or two.

The left will never see a difference between legal and illegal immigration. Just like they don't see any need to vet refugees and just accept that 10% of them are terrorists. Terrorist attacks are just part of our every day life now, thanks to the left.

As a legal immigrant, I thank you for that post.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Japan has the right idea. They know they need to take care of their own first. They are willing to send money so the refugees can be helped elsewhere. And where they should be helped is in Arab countries.

Soros is behind the protests against the ban on refugees. Soros wants open borders and one world government, something the left denied for years. There are some extremely radical people now in the U.S. who support Soros's idea and are willing to do anything to make it reality. While the majority of people support the refugee ban, the minority who is out there protesting are getting all the attention from media.

We need to take care of our own first. Starbucks announced that they'll hire 10,000 refugees. Not like all Americans already have jobs but they will favor the non-English speaking refugees. I hope people boycott them.

We can't afford to bring more people here when we have homeless people. Why does the left favor hurting our own just to go along with Soros's radical vision?


"UNITED NATIONS – Japan’s prime minister said Tuesday that his nation needs to attend to its own demographic challenges posed by falling birth rates and an aging population before opening its doors to refugees.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced at the U.N. General Assembly that Japan is ramping up assistance in response to the exodus of refugees to Europe from the Middle East and Africa.

He said Japan will provide $1.5 billion in emergency aid for refugees and for stabilization of communities facing upheaval. But speaking to reporters later Tuesday he poured cold water on the idea of Japan opening its doors to those fleeing.

“I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities by women, by elderly people and we must raise (the) birth rate. There are many things that we should do before accepting immigrants”

– Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

He said Japan first needed to attend to domestic challenges which he proposes to tackle under a revamped economic policy that aims to boost GDP to a post-war record level, while bolstering the social security system to support families.

“As an issue of demography, I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities…"

Japan Absolutely REFUSES To Let In Syrian ‘Refugees’, says it must look after its own citizens FIRST - Freedom's Final Stand

There problem here is that Japan didn't go to war in Iraq, Japan didn't destablize the Middle East region. Japan didn't support rebels in Syria. Therefore Japan has every right not to let people in.

The US on the other hand.....

The US didn't destabilize the Middle East either, their own inhabitants have a way of doing that on their own. Even if we did, it doesn't mean we give up the right to choose who we allow to immigrate into our country.

Oh, oh, oh, the US didn't destablize the Middle East.

Right, so, Bush didn't invade Iraq.

Bush didn't turn around and give Paul Bremer total power as leader of Iraq. Bremer didn't get rid of the Iraqi armed forces and police and making thousands upon thousands of young men with families unemployed. He didn't make a power vacuum that was filled by insurgents who turned into groups like ISIS.

The US didn't push the Arab Spring.

I really do wish I lived in your fantasy world, but unfortunately I live in the reality where the US is the world's bullyboy.

 

[bripat9643]

Japan has the right idea. They know they need to take care of their own first. They are willing to send money so the refugees can be helped elsewhere. And where they should be helped is in Arab countries.

Soros is behind the protests against the ban on refugees. Soros wants open borders and one world government, something the left denied for years. There are some extremely radical people now in the U.S. who support Soros's idea and are willing to do anything to make it reality. While the majority of people support the refugee ban, the minority who is out there protesting are getting all the attention from media.

We need to take care of our own first. Starbucks announced that they'll hire 10,000 refugees. Not like all Americans already have jobs but they will favor the non-English speaking refugees. I hope people boycott them.

We can't afford to bring more people here when we have homeless people. Why does the left favor hurting our own just to go along with Soros's radical vision?


"UNITED NATIONS – Japan’s prime minister said Tuesday that his nation needs to attend to its own demographic challenges posed by falling birth rates and an aging population before opening its doors to refugees.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced at the U.N. General Assembly that Japan is ramping up assistance in response to the exodus of refugees to Europe from the Middle East and Africa.

He said Japan will provide $1.5 billion in emergency aid for refugees and for stabilization of communities facing upheaval. But speaking to reporters later Tuesday he poured cold water on the idea of Japan opening its doors to those fleeing.

“I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities by women, by elderly people and we must raise (the) birth rate. There are many things that we should do before accepting immigrants”

– Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

He said Japan first needed to attend to domestic challenges which he proposes to tackle under a revamped economic policy that aims to boost GDP to a post-war record level, while bolstering the social security system to support families.

“As an issue of demography, I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities…"

Japan Absolutely REFUSES To Let In Syrian ‘Refugees’, says it must look after its own citizens FIRST - Freedom's Final Stand

Japan has always been a xenophobia country. It is very difficult for anyone to emigrate there or obtain citizenship. It's a very closed society. Not something that other countries should be emulating or considering as a role model.

Making up derogatory names for a smart policy doesn't help your case. Insults are not a substitute for logic.

Why shouldn't other countries emulate Japan? We wouldn't have Latin gangs shooting up our cities and terrorists committing mass murder if we did.

So where's the downside?

 

[bripat9643]

Japan has the right idea. They know they need to take care of their own first. They are willing to send money so the refugees can be helped elsewhere. And where they should be helped is in Arab countries.

Soros is behind the protests against the ban on refugees. Soros wants open borders and one world government, something the left denied for years. There are some extremely radical people now in the U.S. who support Soros's idea and are willing to do anything to make it reality. While the majority of people support the refugee ban, the minority who is out there protesting are getting all the attention from media.

We need to take care of our own first. Starbucks announced that they'll hire 10,000 refugees. Not like all Americans already have jobs but they will favor the non-English speaking refugees. I hope people boycott them.

We can't afford to bring more people here when we have homeless people. Why does the left favor hurting our own just to go along with Soros's radical vision?


"UNITED NATIONS – Japan’s prime minister said Tuesday that his nation needs to attend to its own demographic challenges posed by falling birth rates and an aging population before opening its doors to refugees.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced at the U.N. General Assembly that Japan is ramping up assistance in response to the exodus of refugees to Europe from the Middle East and Africa.

He said Japan will provide $1.5 billion in emergency aid for refugees and for stabilization of communities facing upheaval. But speaking to reporters later Tuesday he poured cold water on the idea of Japan opening its doors to those fleeing.

“I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities by women, by elderly people and we must raise (the) birth rate. There are many things that we should do before accepting immigrants”

– Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

He said Japan first needed to attend to domestic challenges which he proposes to tackle under a revamped economic policy that aims to boost GDP to a post-war record level, while bolstering the social security system to support families.

“As an issue of demography, I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities…"

Japan Absolutely REFUSES To Let In Syrian ‘Refugees’, says it must look after its own citizens FIRST - Freedom's Final Stand

There problem here is that Japan didn't go to war in Iraq, Japan didn't destablize the Middle East region. Japan didn't support rebels in Syria. Therefore Japan has every right not to let people in.

The US on the other hand.....

So the fact that previous politicians did something stupid means we are condemned to have a stupid immigration policy?

More stupid liber-nonlogic.

 

[bripat9643]

Japan is known to be one of the most racist countries on earth .

Why? Because they won't allow Muslims in their country??

Seems pretty smart to me when you consider what Muslims are doing all over Europe.

Bet the citizens of Europe would love it if their dumbass Govts. got rid of all the Muslims they have let in. Will sure save some European citizens lives.

No. it's cause Japan are assholes . Thy are the worst . Take a quick look at their history sometime .

They don't have mass killings in their work places and night clubs. It seems to be working for them.

Not true. There have been domestic terrorist attacks in Japan:

Tokyo subway sarin attack - Wikipedia

22 years ago.

 

[bripat9643]

Japan is known to be one of the most racist countries on earth .

There the lib goes. Can't refute the argument so he calls them racist.

They are a very xenophobic culture. They don't want anyone who is not Japanese getting citizenship.

That's not "xenophobia", it's called preserving your own culture and not accepting the lie of multiculturalism.

That's what the snowflakes mean by "xenophobia:" smart immigration policy.

 

[bripat9643]

Japan has the right idea. They know they need to take care of their own first. They are willing to send money so the refugees can be helped elsewhere. And where they should be helped is in Arab countries.

Soros is behind the protests against the ban on refugees. Soros wants open borders and one world government, something the left denied for years. There are some extremely radical people now in the U.S. who support Soros's idea and are willing to do anything to make it reality. While the majority of people support the refugee ban, the minority who is out there protesting are getting all the attention from media.

We need to take care of our own first. Starbucks announced that they'll hire 10,000 refugees. Not like all Americans already have jobs but they will favor the non-English speaking refugees. I hope people boycott them.

We can't afford to bring more people here when we have homeless people. Why does the left favor hurting our own just to go along with Soros's radical vision?


"UNITED NATIONS – Japan’s prime minister said Tuesday that his nation needs to attend to its own demographic challenges posed by falling birth rates and an aging population before opening its doors to refugees.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced at the U.N. General Assembly that Japan is ramping up assistance in response to the exodus of refugees to Europe from the Middle East and Africa.

He said Japan will provide $1.5 billion in emergency aid for refugees and for stabilization of communities facing upheaval. But speaking to reporters later Tuesday he poured cold water on the idea of Japan opening its doors to those fleeing.

“I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities by women, by elderly people and we must raise (the) birth rate. There are many things that we should do before accepting immigrants”

– Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

He said Japan first needed to attend to domestic challenges which he proposes to tackle under a revamped economic policy that aims to boost GDP to a post-war record level, while bolstering the social security system to support families.

“As an issue of demography, I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities…"

Japan Absolutely REFUSES To Let In Syrian ‘Refugees’, says it must look after its own citizens FIRST - Freedom's Final Stand

There problem here is that Japan didn't go to war in Iraq, Japan didn't destablize the Middle East region. Japan didn't support rebels in Syria. Therefore Japan has every right not to let people in.

The US on the other hand.....

The US didn't destabilize the Middle East either, their own inhabitants have a way of doing that on their own. Even if we did, it doesn't mean we give up the right to choose who we allow to immigrate into our country.

Yeah, ,everyone knows how peaceful the Middle East was before the U.S. intervened . . . . . . . er, no, that's not right.

 

[JimBowie1958]

The left will never see a difference between legal and illegal immigration. Just like they don't see any need to vet refugees and just accept that 10% of them are terrorists. Terrorist attacks are just part of our every day life now, thanks to the left.

As long as the immigrants are likely Democrat voters, you mean.

They are not so keen on immigrants/refugees from communist countries like Cuba for example.

 

[Timmy]

Japan has the right idea. They know they need to take care of their own first. They are willing to send money so the refugees can be helped elsewhere. And where they should be helped is in Arab countries.

Soros is behind the protests against the ban on refugees. Soros wants open borders and one world government, something the left denied for years. There are some extremely radical people now in the U.S. who support Soros's idea and are willing to do anything to make it reality. While the majority of people support the refugee ban, the minority who is out there protesting are getting all the attention from media.

We need to take care of our own first. Starbucks announced that they'll hire 10,000 refugees. Not like all Americans already have jobs but they will favor the non-English speaking refugees. I hope people boycott them.

We can't afford to bring more people here when we have homeless people. Why does the left favor hurting our own just to go along with Soros's radical vision?


"UNITED NATIONS – Japan’s prime minister said Tuesday that his nation needs to attend to its own demographic challenges posed by falling birth rates and an aging population before opening its doors to refugees.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced at the U.N. General Assembly that Japan is ramping up assistance in response to the exodus of refugees to Europe from the Middle East and Africa.

He said Japan will provide $1.5 billion in emergency aid for refugees and for stabilization of communities facing upheaval. But speaking to reporters later Tuesday he poured cold water on the idea of Japan opening its doors to those fleeing.

“I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities by women, by elderly people and we must raise (the) birth rate. There are many things that we should do before accepting immigrants”

– Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

He said Japan first needed to attend to domestic challenges which he proposes to tackle under a revamped economic policy that aims to boost GDP to a post-war record level, while bolstering the social security system to support families.

“As an issue of demography, I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities…"

Japan Absolutely REFUSES To Let In Syrian ‘Refugees’, says it must look after its own citizens FIRST - Freedom's Final Stand

Japan has always been a xenophobia country. It is very difficult for anyone to emigrate there or obtain citizenship. It's a very closed society. Not something that other countries should be emulating or considering as a role model.

Making up derogatory names for a smart policy doesn't help your case. Insults are not a substitute for logic.

Why shouldn't other countries emulate Japan? We wouldn't have Latin gangs shooting up our cities and terrorists committing mass murder if we did.

So where's the downside?

Japan has a legendary gang problem.

 

[namvet]

in China they shoot the bastards on sight

 

[The Original Tree]

Japan has the right idea. They know they need to take care of their own first. They are willing to send money so the refugees can be helped elsewhere. And where they should be helped is in Arab countries.

Soros is behind the protests against the ban on refugees. Soros wants open borders and one world government, something the left denied for years. There are some extremely radical people now in the U.S. who support Soros's idea and are willing to do anything to make it reality. While the majority of people support the refugee ban, the minority who is out there protesting are getting all the attention from media.

We need to take care of our own first. Starbucks announced that they'll hire 10,000 refugees. Not like all Americans already have jobs but they will favor the non-English speaking refugees. I hope people boycott them.

We can't afford to bring more people here when we have homeless people. Why does the left favor hurting our own just to go along with Soros's radical vision?


"UNITED NATIONS – Japan’s prime minister said Tuesday that his nation needs to attend to its own demographic challenges posed by falling birth rates and an aging population before opening its doors to refugees.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced at the U.N. General Assembly that Japan is ramping up assistance in response to the exodus of refugees to Europe from the Middle East and Africa.

He said Japan will provide $1.5 billion in emergency aid for refugees and for stabilization of communities facing upheaval. But speaking to reporters later Tuesday he poured cold water on the idea of Japan opening its doors to those fleeing.

“I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities by women, by elderly people and we must raise (the) birth rate. There are many things that we should do before accepting immigrants”

– Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

He said Japan first needed to attend to domestic challenges which he proposes to tackle under a revamped economic policy that aims to boost GDP to a post-war record level, while bolstering the social security system to support families.

“As an issue of demography, I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities…"

Japan Absolutely REFUSES To Let In Syrian ‘Refugees’, says it must look after its own citizens FIRST - Freedom's Final Stand

Common Sense.

Too bad THE LEFT HAS NONE!

 

[bripat9643]

Japan has the right idea. They know they need to take care of their own first. They are willing to send money so the refugees can be helped elsewhere. And where they should be helped is in Arab countries.

Soros is behind the protests against the ban on refugees. Soros wants open borders and one world government, something the left denied for years. There are some extremely radical people now in the U.S. who support Soros's idea and are willing to do anything to make it reality. While the majority of people support the refugee ban, the minority who is out there protesting are getting all the attention from media.

We need to take care of our own first. Starbucks announced that they'll hire 10,000 refugees. Not like all Americans already have jobs but they will favor the non-English speaking refugees. I hope people boycott them.

We can't afford to bring more people here when we have homeless people. Why does the left favor hurting our own just to go along with Soros's radical vision?


"UNITED NATIONS – Japan’s prime minister said Tuesday that his nation needs to attend to its own demographic challenges posed by falling birth rates and an aging population before opening its doors to refugees.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced at the U.N. General Assembly that Japan is ramping up assistance in response to the exodus of refugees to Europe from the Middle East and Africa.

He said Japan will provide $1.5 billion in emergency aid for refugees and for stabilization of communities facing upheaval. But speaking to reporters later Tuesday he poured cold water on the idea of Japan opening its doors to those fleeing.

“I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities by women, by elderly people and we must raise (the) birth rate. There are many things that we should do before accepting immigrants”

– Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

He said Japan first needed to attend to domestic challenges which he proposes to tackle under a revamped economic policy that aims to boost GDP to a post-war record level, while bolstering the social security system to support families.

“As an issue of demography, I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities…"

Japan Absolutely REFUSES To Let In Syrian ‘Refugees’, says it must look after its own citizens FIRST - Freedom's Final Stand

Japan has always been a xenophobia country. It is very difficult for anyone to emigrate there or obtain citizenship. It's a very closed society. Not something that other countries should be emulating or considering as a role model.

Making up derogatory names for a smart policy doesn't help your case. Insults are not a substitute for logic.

Why shouldn't other countries emulate Japan? We wouldn't have Latin gangs shooting up our cities and terrorists committing mass murder if we did.

So where's the downside?

Japan has a legendary gang problem.

Yeah? And we don't?

 

[Timmy]

Japan has the right idea. They know they need to take care of their own first. They are willing to send money so the refugees can be helped elsewhere. And where they should be helped is in Arab countries.

Soros is behind the protests against the ban on refugees. Soros wants open borders and one world government, something the left denied for years. There are some extremely radical people now in the U.S. who support Soros's idea and are willing to do anything to make it reality. While the majority of people support the refugee ban, the minority who is out there protesting are getting all the attention from media.

We need to take care of our own first. Starbucks announced that they'll hire 10,000 refugees. Not like all Americans already have jobs but they will favor the non-English speaking refugees. I hope people boycott them.

We can't afford to bring more people here when we have homeless people. Why does the left favor hurting our own just to go along with Soros's radical vision?


"UNITED NATIONS – Japan’s prime minister said Tuesday that his nation needs to attend to its own demographic challenges posed by falling birth rates and an aging population before opening its doors to refugees.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced at the U.N. General Assembly that Japan is ramping up assistance in response to the exodus of refugees to Europe from the Middle East and Africa.

He said Japan will provide $1.5 billion in emergency aid for refugees and for stabilization of communities facing upheaval. But speaking to reporters later Tuesday he poured cold water on the idea of Japan opening its doors to those fleeing.

“I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities by women, by elderly people and we must raise (the) birth rate. There are many things that we should do before accepting immigrants”

– Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

He said Japan first needed to attend to domestic challenges which he proposes to tackle under a revamped economic policy that aims to boost GDP to a post-war record level, while bolstering the social security system to support families.

“As an issue of demography, I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities…"

Japan Absolutely REFUSES To Let In Syrian ‘Refugees’, says it must look after its own citizens FIRST - Freedom's Final Stand

Japan has always been a xenophobia country. It is very difficult for anyone to emigrate there or obtain citizenship. It's a very closed society. Not something that other countries should be emulating or considering as a role model.

Making up derogatory names for a smart policy doesn't help your case. Insults are not a substitute for logic.

Why shouldn't other countries emulate Japan? We wouldn't have Latin gangs shooting up our cities and terrorists committing mass murder if we did.

So where's the downside?

Japan has a legendary gang problem.

Yeah? And we don't?

You brought it up as a reason japans policy is better.

We should never model anything we do after Japan . Everyone in the Far East hates them, with good reason because they are evil.

And their lack of diversity is one reason we beat them in ww2 and have thousands of troops over there.

 

[bripat9643]

Japan has the right idea. They know they need to take care of their own first. They are willing to send money so the refugees can be helped elsewhere. And where they should be helped is in Arab countries.

Soros is behind the protests against the ban on refugees. Soros wants open borders and one world government, something the left denied for years. There are some extremely radical people now in the U.S. who support Soros's idea and are willing to do anything to make it reality. While the majority of people support the refugee ban, the minority who is out there protesting are getting all the attention from media.

We need to take care of our own first. Starbucks announced that they'll hire 10,000 refugees. Not like all Americans already have jobs but they will favor the non-English speaking refugees. I hope people boycott them.

We can't afford to bring more people here when we have homeless people. Why does the left favor hurting our own just to go along with Soros's radical vision?


"UNITED NATIONS – Japan’s prime minister said Tuesday that his nation needs to attend to its own demographic challenges posed by falling birth rates and an aging population before opening its doors to refugees.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced at the U.N. General Assembly that Japan is ramping up assistance in response to the exodus of refugees to Europe from the Middle East and Africa.

He said Japan will provide $1.5 billion in emergency aid for refugees and for stabilization of communities facing upheaval. But speaking to reporters later Tuesday he poured cold water on the idea of Japan opening its doors to those fleeing.

“I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities by women, by elderly people and we must raise (the) birth rate. There are many things that we should do before accepting immigrants”

– Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

He said Japan first needed to attend to domestic challenges which he proposes to tackle under a revamped economic policy that aims to boost GDP to a post-war record level, while bolstering the social security system to support families.

“As an issue of demography, I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities…"

Japan Absolutely REFUSES To Let In Syrian ‘Refugees’, says it must look after its own citizens FIRST - Freedom's Final Stand

Japan has always been a xenophobia country. It is very difficult for anyone to emigrate there or obtain citizenship. It's a very closed society. Not something that other countries should be emulating or considering as a role model.

Making up derogatory names for a smart policy doesn't help your case. Insults are not a substitute for logic.

Why shouldn't other countries emulate Japan? We wouldn't have Latin gangs shooting up our cities and terrorists committing mass murder if we did.

So where's the downside?

Japan has a legendary gang problem.

Yeah? And we don't?

You brought it up as a reason japans policy is better.

We should never model anything we do after Japan . Everyone in the Far East hates them, with good reason because they are evil.

And their lack of diversity is one reason we beat them in ww2 and have thousands of troops over there.

Their "lack of diversity" had nothing to do with it. Our pacific fleet and B-29s are the reason we beat Japan.

Japan's gang problems are nowhere near as bad as ours. Do they have the drug problems we have? Not even close.

 

[otto105]

Japan has the right idea. They know they need to take care of their own first. They are willing to send money so the refugees can be helped elsewhere. And where they should be helped is in Arab countries.

Soros is behind the protests against the ban on refugees. Soros wants open borders and one world government, something the left denied for years. There are some extremely radical people now in the U.S. who support Soros's idea and are willing to do anything to make it reality. While the majority of people support the refugee ban, the minority who is out there protesting are getting all the attention from media.

We need to take care of our own first. Starbucks announced that they'll hire 10,000 refugees. Not like all Americans already have jobs but they will favor the non-English speaking refugees. I hope people boycott them.

We can't afford to bring more people here when we have homeless people. Why does the left favor hurting our own just to go along with Soros's radical vision?


"UNITED NATIONS – Japan’s prime minister said Tuesday that his nation needs to attend to its own demographic challenges posed by falling birth rates and an aging population before opening its doors to refugees.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced at the U.N. General Assembly that Japan is ramping up assistance in response to the exodus of refugees to Europe from the Middle East and Africa.

He said Japan will provide $1.5 billion in emergency aid for refugees and for stabilization of communities facing upheaval. But speaking to reporters later Tuesday he poured cold water on the idea of Japan opening its doors to those fleeing.

“I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities by women, by elderly people and we must raise (the) birth rate. There are many things that we should do before accepting immigrants”

– Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

He said Japan first needed to attend to domestic challenges which he proposes to tackle under a revamped economic policy that aims to boost GDP to a post-war record level, while bolstering the social security system to support families.

“As an issue of demography, I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities…"

Japan Absolutely REFUSES To Let In Syrian ‘Refugees’, says it must look after its own citizens FIRST - Freedom's Final Stand

And for the last 20 years Japan has been mired in an economic slow moving disaster of stagflation and minimal GDP growth.

 

[otto105]

Japan has the right idea. They know they need to take care of their own first. They are willing to send money so the refugees can be helped elsewhere. And where they should be helped is in Arab countries.

Soros is behind the protests against the ban on refugees. Soros wants open borders and one world government, something the left denied for years. There are some extremely radical people now in the U.S. who support Soros's idea and are willing to do anything to make it reality. While the majority of people support the refugee ban, the minority who is out there protesting are getting all the attention from media.

We need to take care of our own first. Starbucks announced that they'll hire 10,000 refugees. Not like all Americans already have jobs but they will favor the non-English speaking refugees. I hope people boycott them.

We can't afford to bring more people here when we have homeless people. Why does the left favor hurting our own just to go along with Soros's radical vision?


"UNITED NATIONS – Japan’s prime minister said Tuesday that his nation needs to attend to its own demographic challenges posed by falling birth rates and an aging population before opening its doors to refugees.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced at the U.N. General Assembly that Japan is ramping up assistance in response to the exodus of refugees to Europe from the Middle East and Africa.

He said Japan will provide $1.5 billion in emergency aid for refugees and for stabilization of communities facing upheaval. But speaking to reporters later Tuesday he poured cold water on the idea of Japan opening its doors to those fleeing.

“I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities by women, by elderly people and we must raise (the) birth rate. There are many things that we should do before accepting immigrants”

– Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

He said Japan first needed to attend to domestic challenges which he proposes to tackle under a revamped economic policy that aims to boost GDP to a post-war record level, while bolstering the social security system to support families.

“As an issue of demography, I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities…"

Japan Absolutely REFUSES To Let In Syrian ‘Refugees’, says it must look after its own citizens FIRST - Freedom's Final Stand

Japan has it right. I'm sure citizens of countries in Europe wish their damned Govts. hadn't let those refugees in.

I'm glad our President has tightened up the vetting for anyone coming into our country. I wish they wouldn't let any of them in. We taxpayers support more that enough in this country and we sure as shit don't need to bankroll refugees.

The 800,000 DACA group already has attained a higher level of education and economic success than your average US Citizen. BTW we don't bankroll them.

 

[Timmy]

Japan has always been a xenophobia country. It is very difficult for anyone to emigrate there or obtain citizenship. It's a very closed society. Not something that other countries should be emulating or considering as a role model.

Making up derogatory names for a smart policy doesn't help your case. Insults are not a substitute for logic.

Why shouldn't other countries emulate Japan? We wouldn't have Latin gangs shooting up our cities and terrorists committing mass murder if we did.

So where's the downside?

Japan has a legendary gang problem.

Yeah? And we don't?

You brought it up as a reason japans policy is better.

We should never model anything we do after Japan . Everyone in the Far East hates them, with good reason because they are evil.

And their lack of diversity is one reason we beat them in ww2 and have thousands of troops over there.

Their "lack of diversity" had nothing to do with it. Our pacific fleet and B-29s are the reason we beat Japan.

Japan's gang problems are nowhere near as bad as ours. Do they have the drug problems we have? Not even close.

They couldn't decode our messages being sent by our Native American speakers .

And immigrant Jews helped develope the a- bomb.

 

[JoeMoma]

Japan has the right idea. They know they need to take care of their own first. They are willing to send money so the refugees can be helped elsewhere. And where they should be helped is in Arab countries.

Soros is behind the protests against the ban on refugees. Soros wants open borders and one world government, something the left denied for years. There are some extremely radical people now in the U.S. who support Soros's idea and are willing to do anything to make it reality. While the majority of people support the refugee ban, the minority who is out there protesting are getting all the attention from media.

We need to take care of our own first. Starbucks announced that they'll hire 10,000 refugees. Not like all Americans already have jobs but they will favor the non-English speaking refugees. I hope people boycott them.

We can't afford to bring more people here when we have homeless people. Why does the left favor hurting our own just to go along with Soros's radical vision?


"UNITED NATIONS – Japan’s prime minister said Tuesday that his nation needs to attend to its own demographic challenges posed by falling birth rates and an aging population before opening its doors to refugees.

Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announced at the U.N. General Assembly that Japan is ramping up assistance in response to the exodus of refugees to Europe from the Middle East and Africa.

He said Japan will provide $1.5 billion in emergency aid for refugees and for stabilization of communities facing upheaval. But speaking to reporters later Tuesday he poured cold water on the idea of Japan opening its doors to those fleeing.

“I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities by women, by elderly people and we must raise (the) birth rate. There are many things that we should do before accepting immigrants”

– Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

He said Japan first needed to attend to domestic challenges which he proposes to tackle under a revamped economic policy that aims to boost GDP to a post-war record level, while bolstering the social security system to support families.

“As an issue of demography, I would say that before accepting immigrants or refugees we need to have more activities…"

Japan Absolutely REFUSES To Let In Syrian ‘Refugees’, says it must look after its own citizens FIRST - Freedom's Final Stand

All americans are refugees or migrants.
Category:American people of Syrian descent - Wikipedia

Really?