Jared Fogle of Subway to plead guilty to child porn

[Luddly Neddite]

You are no more above being criticized when you are stupid than me or anybody else. Grow up.

Jake, I reacted to gunos blanket indictment of Christianity, even a Progressive Reactionary such as yourself should see that[/QUOTE]


That's a lie. He did not make a "blanket indictment of christianity"

Here's what he wrote:

"Good!! It's a start

We should also go after people who belong to the catholic church for supporting pedos"[/QUOTE]

You must be fucking retarded.

Please read what the fucking scumbag wrote[/QUOTE]


I quoted it to you.

Why so much dancing around?

CrusaderFrank

Answer the question:
Why do you oppose going after those who support pedophiles?[/QUOTE]

I don't support pedophiles, why do you support them?

[/QUOTE]


You say you don't support pedo's and yet you attack the OP because he agrees with you?

And, now you accuse me of supporting pedos.

I'm really sick of RWs who dance around this issue and either say outright or hint that some child predators should get a pass. The catholic church, tv personality Duck Dynasty creep, Nugent, Duggars - Fact is, some RWs defend, support and have even said "forgive" this scum.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

guno Luddly Neddite It's not pedophilia when a former Democrat President or a rabbi does it, amiright?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Being mad at Catholics, Frank, is not a blanket indictment of Christianity.

And if any of you far righty reactionaries think for a second Trump will do anything about Marriage Equality, that is a second too long.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Frank. I replied to your statement, not that of guno. You are a progressive statist reactionary in that that you want big Government to return this government and culture to the 1950s. That won't happen.

Jake, See above re: Go Fuck Yourself. I don't endorse pedophilia

Good, glad you don't. But you are a reactionary progressive statist wanting to use Big Government to return our country to the 1950s.

Sure, Jake.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I blame our public education system, neither Jake nor Luddy can read at grade level

 

[blastoff]

Hope Jared's able to find some salami in the slammer.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

guno Luddly Neddite It's not pedophilia when a former Democrat President or a rabbi does it, amiright?

Sorry, I missed the trial, verdict and sentence.

I don't care who it is - if they're guilty, if they either admit it or it is proven, they should pay.

YOU and certain other rabid RWs disagree. YOU and certain other rabid RWs have said some child predators should get a pass.

YOU and certain other rabid RWs are hypocrites.

 

[aaronleland]

Simple. Don't look at porn.

No.

 

[Michelle420]

Child porn is awful......it exploits children.

Regular porn (whatever that might be) exploits women and has 1st amendment protections.

I feel bad for this guy (he is going to pay dearly).

As to all of you screaming for blood....Shut up.

This stuff goes on all the time and I don't hear Sanders, Clinton, Bush, or Trump saying anything about it.

Why do you feel sorry for him? Did someone force him to look at pornography of children?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Frank. I replied to your statement, not that of guno. You are a progressive statist reactionary in that that you want big Government to return this government and culture to the 1950s. That won't happen.

Jake, See above re: Go Fuck Yourself. I don't endorse pedophilia

Good, glad you don't. But you are a reactionary progressive statist wanting to use Big Government to return our country to the 1950s.

Sure, Jake.

And that is why you support a progressive statist who has no desire to end abortion, Marriage Equality, the Iran deal, who wishes to bring in national health care, and who cannot deport immigrants. If his positions sound contradictory, they are.

 

[BullKurtz]

There's an "Eat Fresh" joke in here somewhere...

Ya beat me to it....

Who knows what he's actually guilty of.....these prosecutors throw everything and the kitchen sink at a clown like this and he takes the best deal he can get from them to avoid major time...and time for a "short eyes" is hell on earth.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Simple. Don't look at porn.

No.

Just don't. It's an addiction that causes social and marital problems and can lead to legal problems.

 

[hadit]

Simple. Don't look at porn.

No.

Just don't. It's an addiction that causes social and marital problems and can lead to legal problems.

Agreed.

 

[Skylar]

Federal Child Porn cases aren't softball charges. They most often involve some serious jail time. And looking at the peripherals of this case, it could be very significant. Jared wasn't the only one netted in this investigation. The head of his "Jared Foundation' was charged with possessing and *making* child porn. And he was Jared's only paid employee.

Making child porn brings this to an entirely different level. If Jared had anything to do with it, even as an immediate consumer of these videos, he's looking at decades of time in prison. And being at the bottom of the bottom of the barrel in prison. He'll likely spend most of that time in isolation.

I've seen people get 9 years on possession alone with no priors. Possession with an immediate connection to manufacture? Things don't look so good for Jared.

 

[Skylar]

There's an "Eat Fresh" joke in here somewhere...

Yeah, I'm probably going to hell for laughing at that one.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Federal Child Porn cases aren't softball charges. They most often involve some serious jail time. And looking at the peripherals of this case, it could be very significant. Jared wasn't the only one netted in this investigation. The head of his "Jared Foundation' was charged with possessing and *making* child porn. And he was Jared's only paid employee.

Making child porn brings this to an entirely different level. If Jared had anything to do with it, even as an immediate consumer of these videos, he's looking at decades of time in prison. And being at the bottom of the bottom of the barrel in prison. He'll likely spend most of that time in isolation.

I've seen people get 9 years on possession alone with no priors. Possession with an immediate connection to manufacture? Things don't look so good for Jared.

They've already said the deal makes it no less than five years and no more than twelve, it's up to the judge now

 

[martybegan]

Federal Child Porn cases aren't softball charges. They most often involve some serious jail time. And looking at the peripherals of this case, it could be very significant. Jared wasn't the only one netted in this investigation. The head of his "Jared Foundation' was charged with possessing and *making* child porn. And he was Jared's only paid employee.

Making child porn brings this to an entirely different level. If Jared had anything to do with it, even as an immediate consumer of these videos, he's looking at decades of time in prison. And being at the bottom of the bottom of the barrel in prison. He'll likely spend most of that time in isolation.

I've seen people get 9 years on possession alone with no priors. Possession with an immediate connection to manufacture? Things don't look so good for Jared.

The only thing that may save his ass is if he knows more people involved. These things tend to run in rings of sick fucks, and if he can sell them up the river he could reduce his own punishment.

 

[Skylar]

Federal Child Porn cases aren't softball charges. They most often involve some serious jail time. And looking at the peripherals of this case, it could be very significant. Jared wasn't the only one netted in this investigation. The head of his "Jared Foundation' was charged with possessing and *making* child porn. And he was Jared's only paid employee.

Making child porn brings this to an entirely different level. If Jared had anything to do with it, even as an immediate consumer of these videos, he's looking at decades of time in prison. And being at the bottom of the bottom of the barrel in prison. He'll likely spend most of that time in isolation.

I've seen people get 9 years on possession alone with no priors. Possession with an immediate connection to manufacture? Things don't look so good for Jared.

They've already said the deal makes it no less than five years and no more than twelve, it's up to the judge now

Given the specifics of this case and that it involved underaged sex as well as possession.....I'd say its likely to be closer to the higher end. Though as a mitigating factor, Jared seemed to be focused on post pubescent girls. Its not much to work with, but it may bump his time down a couple of years.

Feds require 80% or so even with good behavior. I think 56 days per year can be dropped from his sentence. So he's looking at years in prison.

 

[Skylar]

Federal Child Porn cases aren't softball charges. They most often involve some serious jail time. And looking at the peripherals of this case, it could be very significant. Jared wasn't the only one netted in this investigation. The head of his "Jared Foundation' was charged with possessing and *making* child porn. And he was Jared's only paid employee.

Making child porn brings this to an entirely different level. If Jared had anything to do with it, even as an immediate consumer of these videos, he's looking at decades of time in prison. And being at the bottom of the bottom of the barrel in prison. He'll likely spend most of that time in isolation.

I've seen people get 9 years on possession alone with no priors. Possession with an immediate connection to manufacture? Things don't look so good for Jared.

The only thing that may save his ass is if he knows more people involved. These things tend to run in rings of sick fucks, and if he can sell them up the river he could reduce his own punishment.

Maybe. But that would link him to involvement in manufacture. And the Federal Courts do not play well with those sick fuckers. If he's 'merely' a consumer, they still don't play softball. But he might see day light before he's crapping in a diaper.

 

[charwin95]

He's fugged...

Court docs: Former Subway spokesman Jared Fogle accused of paying for sex with minors, distributing child pornography

INDIANAPOLIS, Ind. (Aug. 19, 2015) – Former Subway spokesman Jared Fogle arrived at a federal courthouse in Indianapolis Wednesday morning as he prepares to accept a plea deal in connection with a child pornography case.

FOX59 first reported Wednesday that Fogle would plead guilty in the case. He’ll appear in front of federal magistrate Mark Dinsmore in an 11 a.m. hearing.

Fogle is accused of distributing and receiving child pornography and conspiracy to distribute as well as engaging in illicit sexual conduct with a minor, according to court documents.

Documents said Russell Taylor, the former director of Fogle’s Jared Foundation, recorded minors without their knowledge. He then stored videos and images on his computer and other devices. Multiple hidden cameras recorded the footage, which court documents described as sexually explicit. Court documents said Fogle knew about Taylor’s activities regarding the nude videos. He “made comments approving of this activity” and “discussed some of the minors” by name.

“The defendant chose to benefit from production of the nude videos by obtaining access to a significant amount of such material,” court documents said. Prosecutors noted that Fogle didn’t access all of Taylor’s material and noted that if Fogle had reported the activity to authorities, later explicit material would not have been produced.

Court documents also detail alleged sexual encounters involving Fogle and minors. The activity began in 2007 and continued through June 23, 2015, prosecutors said. Fogle “repeatedly engaged in Internet social networking and traveled for the purpose of engaging in commercial sexual activity.”

Court docs Former Subway spokesman Jared Fogle accused of paying for sex with minors distributing child pornography Fox 59

What a sick bastard. All members of his distribution enterprise should be arrested.