bendog
Diamond Member
- Mar 4, 2013
- 46,279
- 9,697
True, but Jeb's saying that if a goper panders to the base, he strays so far into bizarro land that he cannot portray himself as a serious candidate to a majority of voters. And, unless the gop changes, that's about the size of the problem. We can hope that Hillary will be less inclined, and able, to govern without compromising with the saner elements of the gop. The premise of the founders being essentially that nobody is 100% or 100% wrong, and finding a consensus eliminates much of the false assumptions in any issue.Candidates, both Republicans and Democrats will say whatever is necessary to win the primaries which means pandering to the base. Then when they get nominated, they have to soften the message and carefully reverse themselves on some issues to get support from independents and the opposition. That's just how the game is played. You can spot the losers by how deep the holes they dig for themselves in the primaries.Someone should point out that if the primary is lost, the loser never gets to the general election. Unless he thinks that his new pro Hispanic direction will be a bold move that will end up with him winning the primary. He should run with that one. It will be a good test as to whether or not a candidate can win without the base.