Jim Jordan Warns Bragg

[Ray From Cleveland]

Where do you guys get this from? Bragg spelled it all out in the statement of fact.

Did you read it?

Show me in the indictment where he lists the second supposed crime. He didn't. It mentions "the crime" without telling us what that crime was.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Nope. Bragg can’t bring federal charges And has not

He is going after Trump for a federal election violation paying hush money supposedly as a unannounced campaign contribution

 

[Marener]

Show me in the indictment where he lists the second supposed crime. He didn't. It mentions "the crime" without telling us what that crime was.

The second crime isn’t in the indictment because he isn’t prosecuting the second crime.

The second crime was already prosecuted by the DoJ. We all know what that second crime is.

It’s bizarre that you’re pretending this isn’t known.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The states run the elections
There are no elections run by the Federal Government.

But the states do not rule over federal election campaign contributions

 

[Lesh]

But the states do not rule over federal election campaign contributions

Yea and?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yea and?

And that's what this bullshit is about

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The second crime isn’t in the indictment because he isn’t prosecuting the second crime.

The second crime was already prosecuted by the DoJ. We all know what that second crime is.

It’s bizarre that you’re pretending this isn’t known.

No, it never said that. If you're going to try and turn a misdemeanor of the first crime into a felony because it covered up the second crime, we have to know what that second crime is.

 

[Marener]

No, it never said that. If you're going to try and turn a misdemeanor of the first crime into a felony because it covered up the second crime, we have to know what that second crime is.

As I’ve been trying to say, we do know what the second crime is. It’s explained in the statement of fact.

Did you read it or not?

I bet you didn’t. You’re just repeating what you’ve been told.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

As I’ve been trying to say, we do know what the second crime is. It’s explained in the statement of fact.

Did you read it or not?

I bet you didn’t. You’re just repeating what you’ve been told.

I read the indictment. Nowhere does it state what that second crime is. You are assuming it was with Cohen but it's not listed as the second crime.

 

[rightwinger]

But the states do not rule over federal election campaign contributions

If the best you got is a jurisdictional claim, Trump would have this case dismissed by now

You got to come up with a better story

 

[bigrebnc1775]

If the best you got is a jurisdictional claim, Trump would have this case dismissed by now

You got to come up with a better story

That's what this case is about.

 

[busybee01]

I don’t necessarily disagree. On the other hand, if the state is violating equal protection rights on some dumb-ass partisan political basis, that warrants investigation by the federal government.

No one is violating equal protection rights. There is no evidence of partisanship. Republicans are the ones who are acting in a partisan manner.

 

[Marener]

I read the indictment. Nowhere does it state what that second crime is. You are assuming it was with Cohen but it's not listed as the second crime.

No wonder you’re confused. You were too lazy to read the statement of fact.

If you had, you’d have seen that the second crime is very clearly laid out and you wouldn’t be repeating lies about Bragg.

 

[busybee01]

Asking questions is not interfering in anything. Yes, when Congress appropriates money like they did in NY, they have every right to ask questions about it.

No they do not. They are not entitled to any answers other than public information.

 

[busybee01]

How is it a state affair when fat Alvin is accusing Trump of campaign finance violations?

You are the dumbest piece of shit. When you use corporate money and try to claim it is legal fees in a state filing, it is a crime in that state. NY has every right to file criminal charges over that filing.

 

[busybee01]

"Threatening him" with what, the truth?

You are clearly a Trump moron. Threatening him unless he releases information about the case is a threat. All the information that is public is already available. Some of it can be obtained from Trump's lawyers.

 

[busybee01]

There are boatloads of evidence. It doesn't go away because some prog moron says "nuh uhn!"

And Republican state election officials. And Republican judges. When they say there is no evidence, it goes away.

 

[busybee01]

After the indictment McCarthy should have announced they are looking into articles of impeachment for Dementia.

Even McCarthy knows that would be a stupid thing for Republicans to do. In a month or so, Republicans could throw this country off of a financial cliff. They can't even figure out what they want for ransom. Maybe they should be spending more time on that.

 

[bripat9643]

Of course it does. It proves he broke the law. That’s how the justice system works.

No it doesn't. It only proves what people will say when someone is holding a gun to their heads.

 

[busybee01]

Not according to Jim Jordan. They took fed money and that's what gives them the right to know how and why it's being spent.

Jim Jordan is a lying weasel. So are you.