Joe Biden is a "Well Meaning Elderly Man"

[Carl in Michigan]

It's a dark time in our country, when the only person the Demafascsit can run is someone that DOJ thinks is too senile to stand trial.

If it were Trump, there wouldn't be these excuses. This is only for Democrats

 

[BackAgain]

They point blank said that he is guilty, but they decline to prosecute because they have little chance of victory given the "aggravating and mitigating factors", which they outlined and described as "diminished faculties". Fine, don't put him in jail since he doesn't know what he is doing, but he sure as heck shouldn't be President of the United States.

There is no evidence that he was this demented when he initially stole classified documents as a Senator and retained them in an unsafe location.

 

[DBA]

Observations of the persona Biden presented.

I see. You believe Biden is so sharp that he was tricking the special counsel into their assessment. If that is the case, he has tricked everyone with an IQ above room temperature for 3 years.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

 

[AntonToo]

DOJ thinks is too senile to stand trial.

You are full of shit as usual. Report said no such thing.

 

[DBA]

There is no evidence that he was this demented when he initially stole classified documents as a Senator and retained them in an unsafe location.

I agree. I mean he is guilty, but the counsel felt that he would gain sympathy from a jury and a conviction wouldn't be attainable for that reason, not because he isn't guilty. The funny thing is, these dimwits defending him want to say that its all a farce and he is mentally fit, in which case, he should be prosecuted. In their minds, he should get away with this and continue to be President. They want their cake and to eat it too.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Who is too senile to be prosecuted, but well enough to be the leader of the free world

I'm old enough to remember that in 2020 when the leftwing morons and their fat bloated twat experts were insisting that Joe was not already gone to ice cream diaper change land


Shut up bigots
Russian collusion !
Define socialism !

 

[AntonToo]

the counsel felt that he would gain sympathy from a jury and a conviction wouldn't be attainable for that reason

Bullshit, counsel is talking about Jury finding reasonable doubt that Biden retained documents willfuly as opposed to honestly forgetting he still had them.

"Sympathy" has nothing to do with it.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

 

[BackAgain]

You are full of shit as usual. Report said no such thing.

You are a douche, Antoinette.

All the elements are present according to the special prosecutor and his staff.

So on what basis did they conclude that he shouldn’t be prosecuted? Think it through.

It can only be that a jury might view Potato in a sympathetic light like “oh. That poor befuddled old man with dementia.”

Charge him when he can be legally charged. Then try his Depends-covered ass. Let the defendant worry about his alleged defenses.

How about that option?

 

[Dadoalex]

I see. You believe Biden is so sharp that he was tricking the special counsel into their assessment. If that is the case, he has tricked everyone with an IQ above room temperature for 3 years.

Tricking?
No, lawyering.

And I see you exclude yourself from the "trickery" but not the stupidity.

BTW...
Remember when trump mistook the woman he raped for one of his wives?

Good times...Good Times

 

[AntonToo]

You are a douche, Antoinette.

All the elements are present according to the special prosecutor and his staff.

Thats a fantasy.

This is the reality, quoting from page one of the report summary:

"we conclude that the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt"

further on page 4:

"we do not believe this evidence is sufficient, as jurors would likely find reasonable doubt for one or more of several reasons."

https://www.justice.gov/storage/report-from-special-counsel-robert-k-hur-february-2024.pdf

SP saying all elements are present would be in DIRECT contradiction to SP saying that evidence does not establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt and that JURY DURING TRIAL would most likely find Biden not guilty.

 

[Frankenstein]

Yes dumbass, JURY DURING TRIAL.

Read those words untill you understand crystal clear that they mean Biden was fit for trial.

If Biden was unfit to stand trial there would be no jury to even think about.


Biden is man with poor memory (everyone agrees on that) and it's reasonably possible he could have honestly forgoten about documents he should have returned. THE END.

B.S, but I understand those are the talking points being pushed. It means they would feel so sorry for the inept Dementia riddled pedophile that they wouldn't be able to bring themselves to convict him!
Read this carefully
“Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen,” the report states, including “documents about military and foreign policy in Afghanistan” and “handwritten entries about issues of national security and foreign policy implicating sensitive intelligence sources and methods” that he kept in an unlocked drawer.

 

[BackAgain]

Thats a fantasy.

This is the reality, quoting from page one of the report summary:

"we conclude that the evidence does not establish Mr. Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt"

They conclude? Why? How? What element is missing according to their own report?

Come on Antoinette. We all see that you’re a babbling simpleton. But maybe with the help of an attendant even you can connect the dots.

SP saying all elements are present would be in DIRECT contradiction to SP saying that evidence does not establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Yes. That is a contradiction. So what explains it?

 

[AntonToo]

B.S, but I understand those are the talking points being pushed.

Thats just more bullshit in your empty head.

 

[AntonToo]

Yes. That is a contradiction. So what explains it?

Your stament being bullshit explains it. DUH.

There is a direct contradiction between your bs claims and what report actually says.

 

[BackAgain]

Your stament being bullshit explains it. DUH.

But I’ve only spoken the truth.

So your “explanation” fails — as always.

 

[Frankenstein]

Moron, he was fit to stand trial, problem was lack of evidence of melicious intent, so the case against him was a looser.

Biden could have honestly forgoten about the documents given his poor memory and there was insufficient evidence to convict.

On the other hand we have Trump - who lied and obstructed investigation at every turn. NOBODY is going to find him honest, he FULLY gave away his guilty conscience.

willfully retained and disclosed classified materials AFTER his vice presidency when he was a private citizen,

 

[AntonToo]

But I’ve only spoken the truth.

The truth of what SP plainly states is in the report. You claiming it says completely opposite is of course bullshit.

You certinaly did not speak the truth.

 

[Independent thinker]

Just more of the BS that stated with Comey regarding not prosecuting Hillary.

Yeah. I thought the same thing when I heard it. She's (he's) guilty as charged but no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute. But a reasonable prosecutor would prosecute Trump for the very same things.