Maybe she suffered something traumatic, maybe she didn't. The point is, you don't get to trash another person's life without some details and evidence. She had neither, not even the testimony of someone she told it happened, and you choose to believe her largely because of who she was accusing. Note that nowhere have I accused Biden of doing what he's being accused of doing. That remains to be seen. Naturally, you will find their stories to be miraculously unbelievable and will gleefully trash their reputations without knowing them at all. Nor have I trashed Ford as you so desperately hope and wish that I did. But hey, cling to whatever helps you keep your world view intact in the face of evidence to the contrary."No need" for Ford to speak up? Think about that one carefully for a minute. And yes, when it comes to accusing someone of a very serious crime, I do expect details to match up, because otherwise you can have vague, untrue accusations destroying lives. Naturally, I dislike the idea of Biden being president, because I think he would be a bad one. What you are lacking, however, is anywhere I've proclaimed him guilty of sexual harassment. That's not been proven and may never be. I am watching with amusement, however, the very same who pilloried Kavanaugh as a rapist or sexual abuser on a very old, unsubstantiated accusation suddenly discovering the need for proof before sending someone up the river. So, do you believe Clinton is a sexual harasser?Nope.Ah, yes, the old agenda driven belief system. A dispassionate look at the cases would prove that ineffective. When a decades old accusation surfaces at just the right time to inflict the most possible damage to a career and to leave no time for the accused to defend himself, the accuser loses credibility. When the accuser insists that something happened at certain location and time, but cannot say how she arrived at that location or how she got back home, she loses credibility. When she insists something happened, yet no one else that was there says they knew anything at all about it happening, she loses credibility. When the accuser only surfaces at the critical time, tries to do damage, then immediately disappears after failing, she loses credibility. The same thing will happen to Biden's accusers. If they can't produce credible evidence, such as proof they were together at the time and place they said something happened, or people in whom they confided at the time that the they were groped by Quid Pro Joe, their stories will likely fall apart as well. The only thing that remains to be seen is how much damage they will do.No because the people are different. A well renowned college professor with nothing to gain would hold more credibility than say a person who spent his collerge years in a drunken stupor with the USSC position to lose. I would belive anyone over Trump, a proven frequent liar.When they're decades old with no witnesses, no contemporary reports or even 2nd hand witnesses and no physical evidence tying both parties to the same place and time, they pretty much are because they come down to he said, she said stories. The claims against Kavanaugh were no more credible than the ones against Biden, yet we're going to see those who screamed bloody murder that Kavanaugh was guilty and that all women must be heard and believed now say that Biden is innocent and his accusers must not be believed, and on it goes. This will become SOP every election cycle.All claims are not all equal.This is merely confirming my prediction. Decades old, impossible to prove accusations of sexual misconduct will be a normal part of every election cycle. We saw it against Kavanaugh and I predicted that we would see it against the next democrat candidate, and we have. They've already shot their wad against Trump, so we won't be hearing any more about that except for dredged up, toothless claims to be hurled as a weak defense any time Biden's name is in the spotlight.Maybe Bill Clinton should have thought about that when he molested Paula Jones...
Maybe Paula Jones shouldn't have lied her ass off.
Do you know when this shit will stop? It's when we start fining these liars for perjury and wasting the courts time.
You automatically grant credibility based on your personal support for or antipathy toward the accused. Therefore, Bubba Clinton harassed no one, Kavanaugh is as guilty as Al Capone, Trump is a rapist, and Biden is clean of all accusations. Tis partisanship at its worst.
There was no need for Ford to speak up until the beer guzzler was nominated to the USSC.
And I see you have a degree in Psychiatry & understand how traumatic events are remembered. Did you get that from Trump U?
And really, you using my supposed dislike for Kasvanaugh as you spew your dislike for Biden is quite amusing.
I never said Clinton did not sexually harass. Now you are acting like the typical Trumpette lying fuck.
I said Trump is an accused rapist. One spousal Rape & the other Child rape (with a witness).
Funny shit. Your "Quid Pro Joe" demonstrated exactly what you think of BIden to spread that lie about Biden & Ukraine.
You can expect things to match up because you are not a psychiatrist who treats people who have had traumatic events in their lives. Or maybe attempted rape is just a normal activity to you. Which is it?
Ford did not accuse Kavanaugh of rape. It was attempted rape. Kavanaugh could have survived it without the trashing of Ford by assfucks like you or screaming how he liked beer. All he had to do was say he had no memory & if he did it, he was sorry. The guy spent most of his college days drunk. His action during the committee meeting disqualified him. What an ass he is.