Joe Biden’s sexual accuser Tara Reade Officially files criminal complaint in DC

[luchitociencia]

The real question here for the voters in November is do we want a possible Rapist in the WH.

First, whatever Joe Biden made years or decades ago is the past.
Second, the accuser waited years and years to finally sue him in court. What a bump!
Third, today Joe Biden is that "old" that he is no danger for any "teenager girl" in his hands.
Fourth, the current problem with Joe Biden is not his sexual desires but his decaying mind.

P. Trump: "We handled the Coronavirus the best way to protect American lives"
V.P. Biden: "I should have made better, consulting doctors instead of "advisers".
P.Trump: "The advisers were the best specialists in pandemic crisis, their opinion was credible"
V.P. Biden: "Doctors know patients better and their advice is more credible."
P. Trump: "Then, you should follow your doctor advice and take your pills, you are not thinking"
V.P. Biden: OK, OK, I have a disability, any problem?
P.Trump: Yes, there is a problem. You can run for president having a disability... but not "that kind of disability..."

 

[hadit]

Maybe Bill Clinton should have thought about that when he molested Paula Jones...

Maybe Paula Jones shouldn't have lied her ass off.

Do you know when this shit will stop? It's when we start fining these liars for perjury and wasting the courts time.

This is merely confirming my prediction. Decades old, impossible to prove accusations of sexual misconduct will be a normal part of every election cycle. We saw it against Kavanaugh and I predicted that we would see it against the next democrat candidate, and we have. They've already shot their wad against Trump, so we won't be hearing any more about that except for dredged up, toothless claims to be hurled as a weak defense any time Biden's name is in the spotlight.

All claims are not all equal.

When they're decades old with no witnesses, no contemporary reports or even 2nd hand witnesses and no physical evidence tying both parties to the same place and time, they pretty much are because they come down to he said, she said stories. The claims against Kavanaugh were no more credible than the ones against Biden, yet we're going to see those who screamed bloody murder that Kavanaugh was guilty and that all women must be heard and believed now say that Biden is innocent and his accusers must not be believed, and on it goes. This will become SOP every election cycle.

No because the people are different. A well renowned college professor with nothing to gain would hold more credibility than say a person who spent his collerge years in a drunken stupor with the USSC position to lose. I would belive anyone over Trump, a proven frequent liar.

Ah, yes, the old agenda driven belief system. A dispassionate look at the cases would prove that ineffective. When a decades old accusation surfaces at just the right time to inflict the most possible damage to a career and to leave no time for the accused to defend himself, the accuser loses credibility. When the accuser insists that something happened at certain location and time, but cannot say how she arrived at that location or how she got back home, she loses credibility. When she insists something happened, yet no one else that was there says they knew anything at all about it happening, she loses credibility. When the accuser only surfaces at the critical time, tries to do damage, then immediately disappears after failing, she loses credibility. The same thing will happen to Biden's accusers. If they can't produce credible evidence, such as proof they were together at the time and place they said something happened, or people in whom they confided at the time that the they were groped by Quid Pro Joe, their stories will likely fall apart as well. The only thing that remains to be seen is how much damage they will do.

You automatically grant credibility based on your personal support for or antipathy toward the accused. Therefore, Bubba Clinton harassed no one, Kavanaugh is as guilty as Al Capone, Trump is a rapist, and Biden is clean of all accusations. Tis partisanship at its worst.

Nope.

There was no need for Ford to speak up until the beer guzzler was nominated to the USSC.

And I see you have a degree in Psychiatry & understand how traumatic events are remembered. Did you get that from Trump U?

And really, you using my supposed dislike for Kasvanaugh as you spew your dislike for Biden is quite amusing.

I never said Clinton did not sexually harass. Now you are acting like the typical Trumpette lying fuck.

I said Trump is an accused rapist. One spousal Rape & the other Child rape (with a witness).

"No need" for Ford to speak up? Think about that one carefully for a minute. And yes, when it comes to accusing someone of a very serious crime, I do expect details to match up, because otherwise you can have vague, untrue accusations destroying lives. Naturally, I dislike the idea of Biden being president, because I think he would be a bad one. What you are lacking, however, is anywhere I've proclaimed him guilty of sexual harassment. That's not been proven and may never be. I am watching with amusement, however, the very same who pilloried Kavanaugh as a rapist or sexual abuser on a very old, unsubstantiated accusation suddenly discovering the need for proof before sending someone up the river. So, do you believe Clinton is a sexual harasser?

Funny shit. Your "Quid Pro Joe" demonstrated exactly what you think of BIden to spread that lie about Biden & Ukraine.

You can expect things to match up because you are not a psychiatrist who treats people who have had traumatic events in their lives. Or maybe attempted rape is just a normal activity to you. Which is it?

Ford did not accuse Kavanaugh of rape. It was attempted rape. Kavanaugh could have survived it without the trashing of Ford by assfucks like you or screaming how he liked beer. All he had to do was say he had no memory & if he did it, he was sorry. The guy spent most of his college days drunk. His action during the committee meeting disqualified him. What an ass he is.

Maybe she suffered something traumatic, maybe she didn't. The point is, you don't get to trash another person's life without some details and evidence. She had neither, not even the testimony of someone she told it happened, and you choose to believe her largely because of who she was accusing. Note that nowhere have I accused Biden of doing what he's being accused of doing. That remains to be seen. Naturally, you will find their stories to be miraculously unbelievable and will gleefully trash their reputations without knowing them at all. Nor have I trashed Ford as you so desperately hope and wish that I did. But hey, cling to whatever helps you keep your world view intact in the face of evidence to the contrary.

So you you declare the no witness, no crime rule. If there are no witnersses or video, it is OK to assault women. You Trump lovers are all the same.

You think it is OK for YOU to trash the victim.

A lot of people are convicted when there is no physical proof. It goes to the character of those giving testimony.

You believe the sloppy beered up college drunk.

And this is why no one grants you any credibility.

1. Of course people are convicted when there is no physical proof, but if there is none, their story has to at least hold together and be convincing. Merely accusing a Republican is not a convincing factor to the sane world. Sad that you fell for that, and boy did you ever. You're so far gone Ford herself could retract her story and you'd still insist it was true.
2. I didn't trash anyone. The fact that you continue to say I think it is okay to do so in the face of my stating I did not and your singular inability to provide evidence of said trashing speaks volumes about your lack. Lack of what, you may ask? Pretty much everything that's needed to be taken seriously. Show where I trashed her if you think I did.
3. No witness, no crime? Nonsense. You're foolish for even trying to open that door. But if there are no witnesses, the story has to be compelling. She couldn't even provide how she got to the house, how she got home, who she would have told about this horrendous thing that supposedly happened to her, and no one else who was at that gathering supported her story. Not very compelling, and you don't get to trash a person's life and career with weak stuff like that.
4. I don't have to believe him when she has to prove her accusation. Keeping silent for decades and ONLY coming forward at a very pivotal moment of his life when it is VERY politically advantageous for his opponents merely raises the bar on her necessary credibility. In this nation, you're innocent until proven guilty, and her story fell far short of proving anything of the sort, and you fell head over heels for it.

So go ahead, thrash around in your Scooby Doo bedsheets insisting I'm this or that, or something else. It makes no difference to me and doesn't defend Biden at all. That is the whole point here, remember?

 

[Ame®icano]

#BelieveMostWomen

 

[Ame®icano]

It looks like the sexual assault charge is the real deal, or at least it's a hill the accuser is willing to die on, and I have a feeling it's just an opening salvo. I suspect that Barr has some stuff to drop at some point but that's mostly theoretical so we shouldn't base too much on it. My point is that Biden has a lot of mines waiting to go off, while Trump doesn't have any, they might replay the pussy tape but it's old news now.

Another thing to look at is Biden's fundraising, that "no refunds" Bernie meme is actually pretty vital since Bernie has been doing ALL of the DNC's fundraising for the last month and a half, without that Bernie money Biden's funds are low enough that your local car dealership would probably be nervous looking at the figures, let alone a presidential campaign. Bloomberg said he'd continue to spend at campaign levels to help Biden, but to be blunt he lied. I'm sure he'll throw a few million at him but he's not giving Biden half a billion. With Bernie's campaign over I just don't see Biden having any good moneymaking opportunities, I suspect that the DNC encouraged Bernie to go as far as he did for that reason.

 

[JoeB131]

It looks like the sexual assault charge is the real deal, or at least it's a hill the accuser is willing to die on, and I have a feeling it's just an opening salvo. I suspect that Barr has some stuff to drop at some point but that's mostly theoretical so we shouldn't base too much on it. My point is that Biden has a lot of mines waiting to go off, while Trump doesn't have any, they might replay the pussy tape but it's old news now.

40,000 dead and 23 million unemployed. That's the mine that has ALREADY KILLED TRUMP. That some flaky bitch is accusing Biden of fingering her in version #4 of her story really doesn't mean much. Just ask Clinton and Trump. Americans don't really give a shit about that sort of thing.

Another thing to look at is Biden's fundraising, that "no refunds" Bernie meme is actually pretty vital since Bernie has been doing ALL of the DNC's fundraising for the last month and a half, without that Bernie money Biden's funds are low enough that your local car dealership would probably be nervous looking at the figures, let alone a presidential campaign. Bloomberg said he'd continue to spend at campaign levels to help Biden, but to be blunt he lied. I'm sure he'll throw a few million at him but he's not giving Biden half a billion. With Bernie's campaign over I just don't see Biden having any good moneymaking opportunities, I suspect that the DNC encouraged Bernie to go as far as he did for that reason.

again, now that Biden is the candidate, the people with money will start contributing to him, because even they know we can't survive four more years of Trump's incompetence.

 

[RealDave]

'Will the #MeToo movement please stand up?

While Hollywood’s believe-all-women activists were quick to defame Brett Kavanaugh, the elite seem to be strangely quiet when it comes to Joe Biden.

Tara Reade, who accused Biden of sexual assault in 1993, has officially filed a criminal complaint in Washington D.C.

Reade has accused Biden of assaulting her when he was in the Senate. She was a staffer in 1993.

Biden has said that he “Believes all women,” yet his campaign denies the claim.

Joe Biden's Sexual Accuser Tara Reade Officially Files Criminal Complaint in DC'

The real question here for the voters in November is do we want a possible Rapist in the WH. Its a terrible thing for Sleepy Joe to brutalize US government staffers. But as President, he is going to be close to world leaders. If he behaves the same way with the Queen of England or Putin's wife, or Mrs. Abe the Empire of Japan's first lady, he can easily launch America into WWIII

A Trumpette askling this question is funnier than shit.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Not what the left wanted to hear: Biden's accusers mom called into the Larry King show back in 1993 talking about the assault. Definitely gives credibility to the allegations.

All allegations against Trump surfaced after he started to run for president thus their credibility drops tremendously.

 

[RealDave]

Not what the left wanted to hear: Biden's accusers mom called into the Larry King show back in 1993 talking about the assault. Definitely gives credibility to the allegations.

All allegations against Trump surfaced after he started to run for president thus their credibility drops tremendously.

Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

You fucking Trumpette are just plain dumber than shit.

Get informed or STU you God damn idiot.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Not what the left wanted to hear: Biden's accusers mom called into the Larry King show back in 1993 talking about the assault. Definitely gives credibility to the allegations.

All allegations against Trump surfaced after he started to run for president thus their credibility drops tremendously.

Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

You fucking Trumpette are just plain dumber than shit.

Get informed or STU you God damn idiot.

That's funny. The left didn't mention a single one until Trump became the nominee.

Someone is triggered.

Don't like how ol' Biden's accuser seems to be credible huh? Don't get mad at me because your party is running an accused rapist against the incumbent president that had record low unemployment numbers just 2 months ago.

Joe Biden says all women should be believed. I agree. If your party doesn't get him the fuck out within the next week you're handing the already guaranteed win for Trump to Trump on a silver platter. Biden has too much baggage with him sexually assaulting women and having his son tied up in Ukraine deals. Debating Biden would be a cakewalk for Trump.

Joe Biden Said He Believes All Women. Does He Believe Tara Reade?

When it comes to #MeToo sexual misconduct issues, former Vice President Joe Biden, the Democratic Party's presumptive 2020 presidential nominee,…

reason.com

 

[tyroneweaver]

Biden authored the violence against women act. I just say we need to be getting this from more than trump supporters and then if we are going to measure Biden by allowing this woman to speak, then all of trumps victims should be given equal time. And if people are going to believe Bidens accuser without question then we must believe all of trumps.

Have you seen the 1993 Larry king tape where Tara Reid’s mother calls in about the assault?
the assault has been buried by dem press to protect there own
You say the rw is bias. Well ya the rw is the only ones that ever will report it

 

[tyroneweaver]

Maybe Bill Clinton should have thought about that when he molested Paula Jones...

Maybe Paula Jones shouldn't have lied her ass off.

Do you know when this shit will stop? It's when we start fining these liars for perjury and wasting the courts time.

Let us know when Dr. Blasey Ford is charged.

Blasey Ford will not be charged. Kavanaugh did what she said. Just like trump assaulted and raped 19 women. And Biden may have done this. But why did she not bring this up in 2008? She had 8 years to do so while he was Vice President. You guys on the right have tried to smear Biden in every way shape or form, this is why this story will not be believed until it gets out of the right wing fake news sphere.

She brought it up in 1993

CNN Slammed For Avoiding Biden Sexual Assault Story After 1993 Larry King Clip Surfaces

pjmedia.com

 

[tyroneweaver]

Not what the left wanted to hear: Biden's accusers mom called into the Larry King show back in 1993 talking about the assault. Definitely gives credibility to the allegations.

All allegations against Trump surfaced after he started to run for president thus their credibility drops tremendously.

Donald Trump sexual misconduct allegations - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

You fucking Trumpette are just plain dumber than shit.

Get informed or STU you God damn idiot.

We don’t back down from bullies fakeydavey

 

[Jitss617]

Maybe Bill Clinton should have thought about that when he molested Paula Jones...

Maybe Paula Jones shouldn't have lied her ass off.

Do you know when this shit will stop? It's when we start fining these liars for perjury and wasting the courts time.

You democrats dug your grave with Kavanagh, enjoy lol

 

[JoeB131]

Not what the left wanted to hear: Biden's accusers mom called into the Larry King show back in 1993 talking about the assault. Definitely gives credibility to the allegations.

We don't know that's her mom.
We don't know that she told her mom the truth.
We don't know which Senator she was talking about.

We do know that in 2018, she claimed she quit because she loved Russia so much and hated American imperialism.

 

[Jitss617]

Not what the left wanted to hear: Biden's accusers mom called into the Larry King show back in 1993 talking about the assault. Definitely gives credibility to the allegations.

We don't know that's her mom.
We don't know that she told her mom the truth.
We don't know which Senator she was talking about.

We do know that in 2018, she claimed she quit because she loved Russia so much and hated American imperialism.

View attachment 328247

Now you’re calling her a liar saying she doesn’t know what her mother sounds like? Wow she’s a Democrat.

 

[tyroneweaver]

Not what the left wanted to hear: Biden's accusers mom called into the Larry King show back in 1993 talking about the assault. Definitely gives credibility to the allegations.

We don't know that's her mom.
We don't know that she told her mom the truth.
We don't know which Senator she was talking about.

We do know that in 2018, she claimed she quit because she loved Russia so much and hated American imperialism.

View attachment 328247

LOL

 

[JoeB131]

Don't like how ol' Biden's accuser seems to be credible huh? Don't get mad at me because your party is running an accused rapist against the incumbent president that had record low unemployment numbers just 2 months ago.

Um no, there's no universe where Tara Raeda aka Alexandra Reade, AKA Tara Moulton, AKA Tara McCabe is credible.

Especially when she has praised Biden over the years.

 

[JoeB131]

Now you’re calling her a liar saying she doesn’t know what her mother sounds like? Wow she’s a Democrat.

Naw, I'm calling her a liar because her story has changed dozens of times over the years...

Evidence Casts Doubt on Tara Reade’s Sexual Assault Allegations of Joe Biden

Alexandra Tara Reade’s accusations of sexual assault against Joe Biden appear very questionable once the story is fully investigated.

medium.com

In 2009, she claimed she quit because her Husband got a job in California.
in 2018, she claimed she quit because she hated American Imperialism and attacks on Russia.
In 2020, she claims that Biden fired her...

All these stories can't be true.

 

[Jitss617]

Don't like how ol' Biden's accuser seems to be credible huh? Don't get mad at me because your party is running an accused rapist against the incumbent president that had record low unemployment numbers just 2 months ago.

Um no, there's no universe where Tara Raeda aka Alexandra Reade, AKA Tara Moulton, AKA Tara McCabe is credible.

Especially when she has praised Biden over the years.

View attachment 328248

Why do you support a rapist

 

[Jitss617]

Now you’re calling her a liar saying she doesn’t know what her mother sounds like? Wow she’s a Democrat.

Naw, I'm calling her a liar because her story has changed dozens of times over the years...

Evidence Casts Doubt on Tara Reade’s Sexual Assault Allegations of Joe Biden

Alexandra Tara Reade’s accusations of sexual assault against Joe Biden appear very questionable once the story is fully investigated.

medium.com

In 2009, she claimed she quit because her Husband got a job in California.
in 2018, she claimed she quit because she hated American Imperialism and attacks on Russia.
In 2020, she claims that Biden fired her...

All these stories can't be true.

Well let’s just ask Joe Biden on national TV if it’s true or not