WinterBorn
Diamond Member
- Moderator
- #361
I said NEW Jim Crow laws.. which has segregated America far worse than the 1960s, And blacks were doing far better back then then they are doing todayWhy are you denying that democrat policies have created segregation in our communities across America? Your so going crazy about a name Jim Crow.. who cares about a name, results or polices Lewis over saw is reality.. these black neighborhoods are doing far worse than they were in 1963 and that’s with the right to vote and that is with the right to go into any place they want to go but because of policies they were not going to go to a certain neighborhood, Because of the wealth gap because of education gap because frankly they don’t know how to act because they didn’t have a nuclear familyI know my community is far more segregated today than it was a 1964, and talking to people that visit Atlanta they would say Atlanta is very segregated.. and John Lewis was in power John Lewis put policies together that create this new segregation..No dog in this fight, but he did say that he figured that John Lewis supported the "new" Jim Crow laws.... He has told you this many times, but you keep reverting back to the "Old" Jim Crow laws as if to suggest that this feller was talking about John Lewis supporting those laws.I’m bringing awareness to the suffering of Black people in this community that he let happen for many many years.. he is a disgusting little pos. Do you wanna ignore the fact that people in his district living rat infestation!? I don’t .. When Black people live better in 1963 than they are doing today in 2020. The man should have been taken out years ago.. but with years of lying to blacks promising and promising to get re-elected, Absolutely disgustingNo one redefined it i always called it new Jim Crow laws, with an explanation it’s just over your head just go somewhere go flop somewhere else.. thanks for playing lolLol I live in reality,, when black ppl in his district where doing far better in 1963, than they are in 2020 than he is the racist, and the NEW Jim Crow laws he helped implement all working. Watching you deflect and flop like a fish is entertaining haAs always, you nail the numbskull racist Jitss617 . The man is not worth a moment of anybody‘s time, but you have a knack of eviscerated him publicly that I admire. Since it is probably impossible to ignore such worthless trash completely, there’s no harm in having a little fun, eh?Me?? LMAO!! First of all, it would be "you're", not "your".
But most importantly, the term "Jim Crow Law" concerns a very specific type of law. One that forces racial segregation. I have told you that over and over. I showed you several links that said the same thing. And yet you continue to try and pretend that Jim Crow laws are any law that works against black people. That is absolutely, unequivocally wrong. No matter how many examples you try to bring up, the specific definition of the term "Jim Crow law" does not change.
Most of his posts are just trolling. But, as I have said before, there are always people lurking on this site. People read his posts and accept them as accurate. Some of those people are simply stupid. But some just don't do research. I want those people to see Jitsie for what is truly is.
And yeah, there is the entertainment value. I can argue with Jitsie and still do other things. I appreciate you noticing.
Your attempts to redefine the term "Jim Crow Law" shows that you do not live in reality. Your inability to either admit you misunderstood the definition of the term or that you are wrong shows your ego is more important than actual truth.
But I repeat the challenge, what do you think "Jim Crow law" means? Give me your new definition of the term. Because what you have been arguing does not fit the long accepted definition.
If my continuing to reiterate the actual definition of the term is what you think is deflecting or flopping like a fish, you obviously don't live in reality at all. You made a claim. I pointed out your claim was bullshit. And you have spent page after page arguing.
The fact that you called it something doesn't matter. There is a long standing, accepted definition of the term.
I have not argued that the policies advocated by either John Lewis or the democrats was good or helped black people. What I have argued, consistently, is that those policies are not Jim Crow laws. They do not involve forced racial segregation by law. You claim I have flopped. But I know you cannot show one single post where I changed what I was saying about Jim Crow laws. Not one.
At least now you know what Jim Crow laws actually were. And what they were not.
Oh, and if you always called it "new Jim Crow laws", why didn't you make that claim about John Lewis? If you always called it that, why didn't you claim John Lewis supported new Jim Crow laws? I'll tell you why. Because it is bullshit.
Now you can run along and play somewhere else. This should be finished.
I have not ignored anything. And you are not bringing awareness about anything. You are scrambling and dancing to avoid admitting that you were wrong.
Are there ghettos in Atlanta? Yes. Were the policies of the democrats good for black people? No.
Did John Lewis support Jim Crow laws? No, he did not. And your insistence that he did is simply you lying to try and save face. Jim Crow laws were a very specific type of law. Apparently you were unaware of that fact. But now you know. So quit bullshitting and trying to make claims about what you said.
You want to discuss John Lewis record as a democrat, or the harm done to blacks by the democratic party? Fine. First you admit that Mr. Lewis did NOT, in fact, support Jim Crow laws.
Now asking him to define what he thinks is the "New" Jim Crow laws, uhh would be nice at this point, and then maybe you two could get somewhere.
I'm thinking at this point that what he means by "New", is Lewis not doing anything but fomenting racism against whites by his actions while in power, and by it all if was the case, it therefore caused blacks to put themselves back into the nice tighty little box that Lincoln had got them out of, otherwise if only in their minds.
After this type of brain control, it allows politician's to use that control to convince these Black's (that are believers in it all), that they must only support Democrats or black politicians and/or white's who can speak the dialect with them (Hillary Clinton), that they are always trying to convince them that they are there for them when they truly weren't. If they were with the power they held, then things would have been alot better for the Black's than they were after all these years.
Heck I know a black man right now, who actually does exactly what John Lewis and others have been doing to other Black's for years, and that is to get them to work hard making individuals rich while they (the hard working Black's), end up with almost nothing at the end of it all. Otherwise their pay and benefits never matched the work that they had put in.
Same with the Mexicans, where as they have the Mexican foreman who speaks the language, and his job is to get the Mexican crew to bust their aces for 12 hours, and do it for $7.00 dollars per hour. They then go to a rented house where 15 or so live, having schedules of 6 to seven days a week to work, and then sending most of their income back home to Mexico.
This is the kind of bullcrap that has been going on, and yes your pure politicians have been up to their eyeballs in it forever.
The people you claim to know who visit Atlanta must not spend much time here. Yes, there are poor neighborhoods. I have not seen any that do not allow whites to live there. And they certainly do not forbid blacks from moving into the nicest neighborhoods.
The idea that any of this is forced, by law, is completely ridiculous. I have seen numerous million dollar homes in Buckhead, Marietta, Sandy Springs ect, that are owned by blacks. If Jim Crow laws were in effect, even if they had the money, they would not be allowed to live there.
If you take a MARTA bus in Atlanta, you will see blacks sitting next to whites. That was illegal under Jim Crow laws. And it was to the point that mobs of ignorant rednecks would violently attack the blacks and the whites who did so.
It all started with your claim that John Lewis supported Jim Crow laws. And has progressed because you steadfastly refuse to admit that was incorrect.
Adding the word "new" to it does not change the fact that Jim Crow laws were about legally forced segregation.