Jordan and Comer should let the Hunter Biden testimony be public

LOL Irony Award of the Day.
Well, to be fair you pretend to forget your words shortly after you say them so perhaps it’s not that they’ve lost their meaning but more that you just don’t know what you’ve already said.
 
Yes, the Dems will obstruct and filibuster and try to use procedural nonsense to muddy the hearing, but let’s get Hunter under oath to explain how he made millions from Ukraine, paid no taxes, and explain the WHATSAPP MESSAGE, THE LAPTOP, 10 to the big guy, sex trafficking, crack use.

Let the Dems obstruct, it makes them look like they are hiding from something.

The Pubs can also ask about why the goalposts moved 6 types.
Nah, we will do a closed door meeting first, THEN he can publicly testify. The public testimony is just spectacle. The closed door hearing is required if you actually want to find the truth and you want do a real investigation.
 
Nah, we will do a closed door meeting first, THEN he can publicly testify. The public testimony is just spectacle. The closed door hearing is required if you actually want to find the truth and you want do a real investigation.
Oddly with Comer, closed door meetings seem to generate mischaracterized and highly edited “testimony “ for political purposes
 
Teaching a horse to do long division is a challenge. Teaching you reading comprehension is impossible.
You would try to teach a horse math, me just drink water is all they need. You can’t even do that
 
What does that mean? These were the points generated by policy makers for Biden to engage with his Ukrainian counterparts.

That’s policy.
LOL Why did you skip over this one?

• I will sign a billion-dollar loan guarantee with you today and announce
additional, new assistance for Ukraine of nearly $190 million.
 
LOL Why did you skip over this one?

• I will sign a billion-dollar loan guarantee with you today and announce
additional, new assistance for Ukraine of nearly $190 million.
The question is whether replacing Shokin was US policy. It was.
 
The question is whether replacing Shokin was US policy. It was.
That was your question, in an attentpt to hide the corrupt act of your guy. The germane question is whether it was US policy to extort the Ukraine for a billion dollars to get Shokin fired.


All the evidence to date says it wasn't and that Joe did this for personal reasons.
 
That was your question, in an attentpt to hide the corrupt act of your guy. The germane question is whether it was US policy to extort the Ukraine for a billion dollars to get Shokin fired.


All the evidence to date says it wasn't and that Joe did this for personal reasons.
So you think it’s just a coincidence that the State Dept independently concluded Shokin was corrupt and preventing necessary reforms?
 

Forum List

Back
Top