🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Juanita Broddrick Tweets Bill Clinton a RAPIST!

My guess is the powers that be had convinced Trump to avoid getting into Bill and Hillary's sexual perversions and attacks on women. Take the high road and all that. Big mistake by Hillary going gutter on Trump he's now free to lay into her no holds barred. If I were Trump I'd head into the next debate armed for bear and let the old hag have it.
Bill Clinton isn't running for president.

Have the fucktards lost their minds sooo, sooo badly that they don't realize nobody gives a damn how many men Melania fucked over 20 years ago?

Because ... wait for it. MELANIA ISNT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.

You choose to ignore Hillary's enabling and actions because you cannot defend them.
 
Broddrick did not report any rape. When she was asked about it, she changed her story repeatedly. Now, in 2016, while she is a Trump supporter, she now claims he raped her. She cannot have any credibility as it is 35 years later and she has first not reported a rape then when forced to say something, changed her story many times.
 
And, what's really important to remember is that Monica Lewinsky went to Washington with the stated intention of seducing Bill Clinton: she bragged about 'taking [her] knee pads with [her]." How is he exploiting or abusing someone who was looking for it, wanting to make it happen? As well, she was over 21.
She was his employee. So that's sexual harassment.

Regardless, it wasn't Hillary, and no sane person thinks Hillary ought to be respectful or compassionate to the woman who seduced and fucked her husband.
 
You choose to ignore Hillary's enabling and actions because you cannot defend them.
You can say "enabling" until the cows come home, but it won't make it any less bat shit crazy.

Enabling would be the following, "Honey, I brought this cute little 21 year old home, do you want to come down and see if you want to fuck her?”
 
And, what's really important to remember is that Monica Lewinsky went to Washington with the stated intention of seducing Bill Clinton: she bragged about 'taking [her] knee pads with [her]." How is he exploiting or abusing someone who was looking for it, wanting to make it happen? As well, she was over 21.
She was his employee. So that's sexual harassment.

Regardless, it wasn't Hillary, and no sane person thinks Hillary ought to be respectful or compassionate to the woman who seduced and fucked her husband.

It's not sexual harassment if he didn't threaten her career if she didn't have sex with him. If was consensual and even at her instigation, there is no sexual harassment.

Lots of people marry people they work with or work for. If it is a consensual relationship and no pressure it put on the employee to perform sexual acts or the employee made to feel uncomfortable in regards to gender, there is no sexual harassment. People in the work environment date all the time. Just because you date or are involved with a co-worker, a supervisor or boss, that does not constitute sexual harassment.
 
It's not sexual harassment if he didn't threaten her career.
He arguably did threaten her career. He had high level officials trying to get her a job elsewhere, in essence punishing her for his indiscretion by hiding her from people who might figure out what was going on.
 
It's not sexual harassment if he didn't threaten her career.
He arguably did threaten her career. He had high level officials trying to get her a job elsewhere, in essence punishing her for his indiscretion by hiding her from people who might figure out what was going on.

Is there empirical evidence for that, or are you just believing accusations and rumor? If you have no solid, verifiable proof, why do you believe it? Oh yeah, because truth is what you choose to believe.
 
Is there empirical evidence for that, or are you just believing accusations and rumor? If you have no solid, verifiable proof, why do you believe it? Oh yeah, because truth is what you choose to believe.
Truth be told, ethically challenged Republicans never cared about the sexual harassment case. They cared more about the blow job, which we both know she wanted to do.

Anyway: April 1996: Then-Deputy White House Chief of Staff Evelyn Lieberman transfers Lewinsky to a job as an assistant to Pentagon spokesman Ken Bacon. Lieberman told The New York Times the move was due to "inappropriate and immature behavior" and inattention to work. At the Pentagon, Lewinsky meets Tripp, a career government worker.
A Chronology: Key Moments In The Clinton-Lewinsky Saga
 
Is there empirical evidence for that, or are you just believing accusations and rumor? If you have no solid, verifiable proof, why do you believe it? Oh yeah, because truth is what you choose to believe.
Truth be told, ethically challenged Republicans never cared about the sexual harassment case. They cared more about the blow job, which we both know she wanted to do.

Anyway: April 1996: Then-Deputy White House Chief of Staff Evelyn Lieberman transfers Lewinsky to a job as an assistant to Pentagon spokesman Ken Bacon. Lieberman told The New York Times the move was due to "inappropriate and immature behavior" and inattention to work. At the Pentagon, Lewinsky meets Tripp, a career government worker.
A Chronology: Key Moments In The Clinton-Lewinsky Saga
And, it is most likely that she was harassing him...wanting to get close, wanting more of a relationship, etc. SHE MADE HIM UNCOMFORTABLE in his job, not the other way around.

Consider this, "inappropriate and immature behavior" and "inattention to work." I can see it very clearly, have seen it in real life.
 
And, it is most likely that she was harassing him...wanting to get close, wanting more of a relationship, etc. SHE MADE HIM UNCOMFORTABLE in his job, not the other way around.

Consider this, "inappropriate and immature behavior" and "inattention to work." I can see it very clearly, have seen it in real life.
He might not be guilty, that is true. That is why we have courts. The Republicans didn't seem to care.

Nonetheless, there were grounds for a case.
 
And, it is most likely that she was harassing him...wanting to get close, wanting more of a relationship, etc. SHE MADE HIM UNCOMFORTABLE in his job, not the other way around.

Consider this, "inappropriate and immature behavior" and "inattention to work." I can see it very clearly, have seen it in real life.
He might not be guilty, that is true. That is why we have courts. The Republicans didn't seem to care.

Nonetheless, there were grounds for a case.

I don't think there are strong grounds as she repeatedly changed her story. The DA apparently didn't think there was enough to go to criminal court on it. In the Republican world, a Republican is innocent until proven guilty, but a Democrat is guilty until proven innocent.

We must remember now, also, that she is today a Trump supporter and has again changed her story to say he raped her. Too convenient to have credibility.
 
I don't think there are strong grounds as she repeatedly changed her story. The DA apparently didn't think there was enough to go to criminal court on it. In the Republican world, a Republican is innocent until proven guilty, but a Democrat is guilty until proven innocent.

We must remember now, also, that she is today a Trump supporter and has again changed her story to say he raped her. Too convenient to have credibility.
Well, she can be a skank, and he could still be guilty.

The bottom line is this. Hillary having zero compassion for the whore who slept with her husband is certainly normal and her prerogative.

In the Land of the Insane, that is called being an enabler.
 
Is there empirical evidence for that, or are you just believing accusations and rumor? If you have no solid, verifiable proof, why do you believe it? Oh yeah, because truth is what you choose to believe.
Truth be told, ethically challenged Republicans never cared about the sexual harassment case. They cared more about the blow job, which we both know she wanted to do.

Anyway: April 1996: Then-Deputy White House Chief of Staff Evelyn Lieberman transfers Lewinsky to a job as an assistant to Pentagon spokesman Ken Bacon. Lieberman told The New York Times the move was due to "inappropriate and immature behavior" and inattention to work. At the Pentagon, Lewinsky meets Tripp, a career government worker.
A Chronology: Key Moments In The Clinton-Lewinsky Saga
And, it is most likely that she was harassing him...wanting to get close, wanting more of a relationship, etc. SHE MADE HIM UNCOMFORTABLE in his job, not the other way around.

Consider this, "inappropriate and immature behavior" and "inattention to work." I can see it very clearly, have seen it in real life.
Yeah, but he felt a little more comfortable after the blow job? Folks, you can't make the stuff up. :lol:
 
Bill Clinton isn't running for president.
No, Jack ass, he WAS president, while doing the sexually abuse...much worse than anything Trump could say
Bill Clinton isn't running for president.

If she was raped, she should have had him prosecuted. We have this thing called, Innocent Until Proven Guilty in this country.

No, , Jack ass, he WAS president, while doing the sexually abuse...much worse than anything Trump could say

And when he raped her, he was ATTORNEY GENERAL of Arkansas... in the late 70's that was like getting Comey to indict that felonious bitch!

A blow job is not sexual abuse.

When the most powerful man on Earth forces a young intern to do it, it IS indeed ABUSE and it is morally reprehensible.
 
Bill Clinton isn't running for president.

So break Hillary's fingers by punching her in the schnozz. That should wake her up. President Slick Willie was impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice over an extramarital affair while in office with Monica Lewinsky and the sexual harassment of Paula Jones. That's what they made stick. Much more dirt under the table with him. He is still a serial rapist. The older he gets, the younger the girls get. His wife should be in prison for Benghazi, servergate and lying about their finances. With Hillary Clinton, it's you know porn when you see it. We do not want a murderer, liar, criminal, crook, witch, racist, monster, joke and professional sleeper Hillary in office and certainly not as POTUS.
 
STeOxBt.png

If you think that makes Clinton a rapist, then Trump is a rapist.
 
So break Hillary's fingers by punching her in the schnozz. That should wake her up. President Slick Willie was impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice over ...
Bill Clinton isn't running for president.
 
Bill Clinton isn't running for president.
No, Jack ass, he WAS president, while doing the sexually abuse...much worse than anything Trump could say
Bill Clinton isn't running for president.

If she was raped, she should have had him prosecuted. We have this thing called, Innocent Until Proven Guilty in this country.

No, , Jack ass, he WAS president, while doing the sexually abuse...much worse than anything Trump could say

And when he raped her, he was ATTORNEY GENERAL of Arkansas... in the late 70's that was like getting Comey to indict that felonious bitch!

A blow job is not sexual abuse.

When the most powerful man on Earth forces a young intern to do it, it IS indeed ABUSE and it is morally reprehensible.
LMAO He didn't force the intern. Do you not know the reality of the situation: she stated she was going to Washington to seduce the president. She was NEVER forced.
 
Not only was Hillary an enabler of Bill's terrible treatment of women, so is the MSM.

Libs everywhere have no idea and of course, they also enable Bill by claiming it is all BS.

If an R did what Bubba did, he would be in prison...but lefties still can't see the double standard.
 
Bill Clinton isn't running for president.
No, Jack ass, he WAS president, while doing the sexually abuse...much worse than anything Trump could say
Bill Clinton isn't running for president.

If she was raped, she should have had him prosecuted. We have this thing called, Innocent Until Proven Guilty in this country.

No, , Jack ass, he WAS president, while doing the sexually abuse...much worse than anything Trump could say

And when he raped her, he was ATTORNEY GENERAL of Arkansas... in the late 70's that was like getting Comey to indict that felonious bitch!

A blow job is not sexual abuse.

When the most powerful man on Earth forces a young intern to do it, it IS indeed ABUSE and it is morally reprehensible.

He didn't force her. There is no evidence he forced her, she never claimed he forced her. He's also not running for President either.
 

Forum List

Back
Top