Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No.As I explained in another post, the authority to determine what is personal and what is presidential is not a "reasonable person" standard. The sole authority is the president's.
Try reading it.Try and actually quote it
Haha the govt doesn’t tell someone what is personal or not.No.
NARA makes that determination. As we have seen throughout the process of attempting to retrieve them.
Subpoenas aren’t issued for them and the FBI doesn’t come for them because Trump had that authority.
Nope. Is it make stuff up day again?And no funny business going on in Trump’s NYC trial?
I did. Hence why I know you dembots can’t quote itTry reading it.
You continue to delay…cause you can’t
Quote it saying what you claim???
I posted the definitions and the link.
I haven't delayed, it's already done.
WW
Indeed they do. Especially where classified or ND materials are concerned.Haha the govt doesn’t tell someone what is personal or not.
Then why ask dopey questions?I did. Hence why I know you dembots can’t quote it
Quote it saying what you claim
www.archives.gov
Because Struth doesn't know anything about any of this.Then why ask dopey questions?
I explained the relevant case law in this post:No.
NARA makes that determination. As we have seen throughout the process of attempting to retrieve them.
Subpoenas aren’t issued for them and the FBI doesn’t come for them because Trump had that authority. They come because he did not and he was non-compliant with the order to return them.
www.usmessageboard.com
Lie.I explained the relevant case law in this post:
Of course none of that is true. That’s why he’s standing trial.I explained the relevant case law in this post:
Smith's patience has expired.
He never lost his clearance after he left the White House until he was indicted. So he can’t be guilty of unauthorized possession of classified documents. You would have to try to get him under the presidential records act, which is not even a criminal statute. Even if it were in the soul case...
Unless you know of a case that superceded it, the president has sole authority to determine what is personal and what is presidential.
apnews.com
What do you mean none of that is true? I quoted the exact ruling and provided a link to it. You think I planted a fake ruling on the internet, somehow?Of course none of that is true.
That’s why he’s standing trial.
Cannon just shot down Trump’s motion to dismiss which argued exactly what you’re asserting.
Judge rejects Trump request to dismiss classified documents prosecution
A federal judge has refused to throw out the classified documents prosecution against Donald Trump. U.S.
You have no idea of what you are talking about.What do you mean none of that is true? I quoted the exact ruling and provided a link to it. You think I planted a fake ruling on the internet, somehow?
Then Smith argued that she was deliberately letting Trump go on trial so that he would be acquitted and Smith could not appeal.
If Smith thinks that Trump will be acquitted in a trial, why is he pressing for one?
Good point, asking a dembot anything is dopeyThen why ask dopey questions?
Honorable people do their jobs.If Smith thinks that Trump will be acquitted in a trial, why is he pressing for one?
Au contraire, petit frere.Good point, asking a dembot anything is dopey
