Judge Overseeing Case To Remove Trump From Ballot Agrees To Banning Threats and Intimidation.

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Until he is convicted, he is innocent, at least that is the way it used to be in our country, when did it change?

The court of public opinion has never changed.

 

[beagle9]

Until he is convicted, he is innocent, at least that is the way it used to be in our country, when did it change?

When the leftist got so far out on a limb, that they would claw their would be rescuer's to pieces in order to secure the tree and limb that they've since got hung out there on.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

When the leftist got so far out on a limb, that they would claw their would be rescuer's to pieces in order to secure the tree and limb that they've since got hung out there on.

Irony meter, broken.

See: any Biden nothingburger thread

 

[beagle9]

Irony meter, broken.

See: any Biden nothingburger thread

Irony eh ? State your case in point.

 

[0311]

Until he is convicted, he is innocent, at least that is the way it used to be in our country, when did it change?

You people were shouting "LOCK HER UP" at the top of your lungs and HRC was never found guilty. The states have right to remove his name from the ballot if so choose. Live with it or don't.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Irony eh ? State your case in point.

Joe is the big guy and took bribes

Can't walk through a trailer park without hearing it every 8.2 seconds

 

[Papageorgio]

The court of public opinion has never changed.

I didn't say it did or didn't, but a man is innocent in the eye of the courts until proven otherwise. It is a dangerous precedent.

 

[beagle9]

Joe is the big guy and took bribes

Can't walk through a trailer park without hearing it every 8.2 seconds

You sticking with that eh ?

 

[miketx]

So many hissy fits, MAGA snowflakes crying about nothing.

Still lying out your socket.

 

[miketx]

He participated in, he encouraged, he condoned and he supported an Insurrection against the United States of America. P01135808 can legally struck from ballot of any state that wants to do so.

He committed an act of treason and under 14th. Amendment is NOT eligible to be president.

You're a lying traitor.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I didn't say it did or didn't, but a man is innocent in the eye of the courts until proven otherwise. It is a dangerous precedent.

But not in the eyes of State legislators. And the question is being put before judges.

 

[Papageorgio]

You people were shouting "LOCK HER UP" at the top of your lungs and HRC was never found guilty. The states have right to remove his name from the ballot if so choose. Live with it or don't.

I never said lock her up, I said that she should be investigated as I did with Trump and let the chips fall where they may. It's politics where Hillary and I disagree. In our country it seems you are guilty before proven innocent depending on which side of the aisle you are on.

So, you believe in guilt or innocence depending on politics?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You sticking with that eh ?

Oh boy, here comes the cult gaslighting. Yawn.

 

[miketx]

But not in the eyes of State legislators. And the question is being put before judges.

Oh lookie! Traitor is a legal expert today!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Oh lookie! Traitor is a legal expert today!

You must be between cheese puffs.

 

[miketx]

You people were shouting "LOCK HER UP" at the top of your lungs and HRC was never found guilty. The states have right to remove his name from the ballot if so choose. Live with it or don't.

I never shouted lock anybody up liar. I don't actually know what laws anyone broke. Unlike you who believes anything.

 

[miketx]

You must be between cheese puffs.

You can't make this level of stupid up.

 

[Papageorgio]

But not in the eyes of State legislators. And the question is being put before judges.

This should not be political; it should be judicial otherwise it can create a future precedent and seems shortsighted. .
That's all.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This should not be political; it should be judicial otherwise it can create a future precedent and seems shortsighted. .

I see your point, but Legislating is also governance, not just politics. I think it would be fair for a State to remove him from the ballot, just based on the public knowledge of what he did.

 

[Papageorgio]

I see your point, but Legislating is also governance, not just politics. I think it would be fair for a State to remove him from the ballot, just based on the public knowledge of what he did.

I respectfully disagree, I guess we wait to see what a judge says.