charwin95
Gold Member
So?Informative.The Supreme Court just unanimously overturned a similar case from the 9th circuit where the Judge tried this.
Even Judge Napolitano from Fox News disagree with you and Barr’s decisions.
.
Napolitano has been wrong before.
As you know....I'm never wrong.
Let's see what Law Professor Johnathan Turley says:
Barr’s latest smack in Obama’s kisser, peeling back the trumped up charges against Flynn, produced the latest whopper from Hussein: “Barack Obama told former members of his administration he is disturbed by the Justice Department's move to dismiss its criminal case against retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn.
“The news over the last 24 hours I think has been somewhat downplayed — about the Justice Department dropping charges against Michael Flynn,” Obama said.
“And the fact that there is no precedent that anybody can find for somebody who has been charged with perjury just getting off scot-free. That’s the kind of stuff where you begin to get worried that basic, not just institutional norms, but our basic understanding of rule of law is at risk. And when you start moving in those directions, it can accelerate pretty quickly as we’ve seen in other places," he added, misstating that Flynn was charged with perjury. Flynn was charged with false statements to the FBI about his conversations with a Russian envoy.” Obama warns 'rule of law is at risk' in leaked audio
“The Obama statement is curious on various levels. First, the exhaustive search may have been hampered by the fact that Flynn was never charged with perjury. He was charged with a single count of false statements to a federal investigator under 18 U.S.C. 1001.
I previously wrote that the Justice Department should move to dismiss the case due to recently disclosed evidence and thus I was supportive of the decision of Attorney General Bill Barr.”
President Obama Declares “There Is No Precedent That Anybody Can Find” For The Flynn Motion [He May Want To Call Eric Holder]