Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then the kid and society suffers.You say you want the woman to live with the consequences but there is no way to force them to do a good job raising these children.
That's their problem. Adapt or succumb.
You could be raising the next Osama or Jeffrey Dahmer or john wills booth.The potential for greatness is not solely dependent upon how one is raised.
I'm on a smart phone. Maybe tomorrow I'll put it all together for you but you can go find all the facts yourself now if you don't want to wait. Its actually obviousHe needs proof that's true? I love it when they hate obvious reality.American history.And your proof is?Encouraging poor single women to abort will lower crime and save lives.
Your version of "obvious reality" needs to be based on facts. So, where's the proof? You are now dodging.
You could be raising the next Osama or Jeffrey Dahmer or john wills booth.The potential for greatness is not solely dependent upon how one is raised.
Nope. but it matters greatly.The potential for greatness is not solely dependent upon how one is raised.
Ideology, not science or reality. What kind of victim do you have when they both go in the same body-bag, coffin, and grave? If you didn't hold the baby, it wasn't one.The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law which recognizes a child in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb".
When it's no longer just a clump of cells.Ideology, not science or reality. What kind of victim do you have when they both go in the same body-bag, coffin, and grave? If you didn't hold the baby, it wasn't one.The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law which recognizes a child in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb".
If you don't breath, you won't use oxygen! When does science say that clump of cells is a human being?
I was just thinking about the people who say "you may be aborting the person who would have cured cancer". More probable you're just aborting a future shithead. LolTrue...were they all products of a single mother who wanted to abort?You could be raising the next Osama or Jeffrey Dahmer or john wills booth.The potential for greatness is not solely dependent upon how one is raised.
I would argue what matters more is the moral compass of society. What children are taught by society. If society reinforces positive values, the absence of positive parental figures is less significant.Nope. but it matters greatly.The potential for greatness is not solely dependent upon how one is raised.
shitheads are people too!I was just thinking about the people who say "you may be aborting the person who would have cured cancer". More probable you're just aborting a future shithead. LolTrue...were they all products of a single mother who wanted to abort?You could be raising the next Osama or Jeffrey Dahmer or john wills booth.The potential for greatness is not solely dependent upon how one is raised.
As the 2004 law states ...The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb".When it's no longer just a clump of cells.Ideology, not science or reality. What kind of victim do you have when they both go in the same body-bag, coffin, and grave? If you didn't hold the baby, it wasn't one.The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law which recognizes a child in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb".
If you don't breath, you won't use oxygen! When does science say that clump of cells is a human being?
Nature is stronger than nurture but nurture matters.I would argue what matters more is the moral compass of society. What children are taught by society. If society reinforces positive values, the absence of positive parental figures is less significant.Nope. but it matters greatly.The potential for greatness is not solely dependent upon how one is raised.
Which is total bullshit. Nature flushes them like toilet paper. Most will never make it.As the 2004 law states ...The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb".When it's no longer just a clump of cells.Ideology, not science or reality. What kind of victim do you have when they both go in the same body-bag, coffin, and grave? If you didn't hold the baby, it wasn't one.The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law which recognizes a child in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb".
If you don't breath, you won't use oxygen! When does science say that clump of cells is a human being?
Aaand... There it is. The real reasoning. TK, this is what I keep trying to tell you. You can't reason with these people. You can only hope they continue to see it as a game and don't try to gain the position of absolute power needed to act on these ideas again.This planets already overpopulated. Its for the greater good.
I was just thinking about the people who say "you may be aborting the person who would have cured cancer". More probable you're just aborting a future shithead. LolTrue...were they all products of a single mother who wanted to abort?You could be raising the next Osama or Jeffrey Dahmer or john wills booth.The potential for greatness is not solely dependent upon how one is raised.
Aaand... There it is. The real reasoning. TK, this is what I keep trying to tell you. You can't reason with these people. You can only hope they continue to see it as a game and don't try to gain the position of absolute power needed to act on these ideas again.This planets already overpopulated. Its for the greater good.
Has nothing to do with what comes naturally, has everything to do what MAN does to them...people die everyday, then people are murdered everyday, you, with no ethics, morals or principles can't understand that!Which is total bullshit. Nature flushes them like toilet paper. Most will never make it.As the 2004 law states ...The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb".When it's no longer just a clump of cells.Ideology, not science or reality. What kind of victim do you have when they both go in the same body-bag, coffin, and grave? If you didn't hold the baby, it wasn't one.The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law which recognizes a child in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb".
If you don't breath, you won't use oxygen! When does science say that clump of cells is a human being?
Nonsense? No. He simply admitted that his underlying motivation for supporting this is population control, ie killing the inferior folks so the superior ones like himself can exist more comfortably. I have little doubt he's going to execute an about face and deny ever saying that in seriousness. Sometimes you can get them to admit that a fetus is alive until they do that exact thing. It's the same thing: a mark of the indefensibility of their position.Actually I have him blathering nonsense now. I'd call that a win, eh?
