Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. Heās under investigation because of the choices he made. To take home hundreds of classified documents and refuse to return them.No. He is under āinvestigationā entirely due to politics.
Wrong. Heās under āinvestigationā because of choices Garland and Wray and Brandon made. Do try to keep up.No. Heās under investigation because of the choices he made.
To take home hundreds of classified documents and refuse to return them.
He has only himself to blame.
Like Obama retaining 30 MILLION PAGES of such records, you mean?It would have been completely avoided if he had done what every other president does at the end of their presidency.
He wasnāt pretending. He may have been mistaken. But thatās a separate issue. Try to stay ON Topic. The topic is his continuing physical possession of some documents,But he was too busy pretending he didnāt lose.
So many falsehoods and many things which are claimed but not proven.Wrong. Heās under āinvestigationā because of choices Garland and Wray and Brandon made. Do try to keep up.
He declassified them. So he Tom home nothing classified. And the GSA packed them up. He was allowed to be in physical possession of them. In fact, you dolt, his lawyers were in long negotiations with the governments lawyers regarding the manner and timing of return of many of the documents for the National Archives.
Repeating your error doesnāt suddenly and magically make it right. Youāre still wrong.
Like Obama retaining 30 MILLION PAGES of such records, you mean?
He wasnāt pretending. He may have been mistaken. But thatās a separate issue. Try to stay ON Topic. The topic is his continuing physical possession of some documents,
Nobody -including you- knows that any of the documents were classified, let alone hundreds....That information hasn't been released.No. Heās under investigation because of the choices he made. To take home hundreds of classified documents and refuse to return them.
How do you propose we figure out what was classified and what was declassified? Given no one knows.Nobody -including you- knows that any of the documents were classified, let alone hundreds....That information hasn't been released.
Why are you monbats wedded to this blatant misinformation?
So many falsehoods and many things which are claimed but not proven.
No. He didnāt. They were however in his physical possession. If you have a point there, you failed to make it.First, he made off with these documents.
Sure he is.He is not legitimately allowed to be in possession of them.
Thatās what the national archives is for.
You repeat the falsehood that Obama retained 30 million pages. Thatās a lie.
The National Archives eventually took physical custody over the records. That much is true.The national archives retained 30 million pages.
He declassified the papers marked āclassifiedā under any category. That you donāt know this or choose not to believe it also doesnāt control. I cite Kash Patel. You? You cite nobody and nothing other than the markings that were on some documents when they initially got classified.You claim he declassified them. What did he declassify? I have no idea. Neither you.
These emotionally unhinged useful idiots have been fed a non-stop stream of nothingburgers for years on end. They're just too stupid to step back, look at the big picture, and ask the obvious questions.Why are you monbats wedded to this blatant misinformation?
You donāt declassify papers. You declassify information. Without knowing what was on those papers, meaning without knowing what information is declassified, we donāt know what damage has been done to national security and what information the government should release to us.Thatās why I responded to your many misstatements separately. Youāre welcome.
No. He didnāt. They were however in his physical possession. If you have a point there, you failed to make it.
Sure he is.
In part. And eventually. But otherwise, youāre wrong. You donāt grasp the PRA. Your ignorance doesnāt control, though.
No. Itās the truth. Your denial is the lie.
The National Archives eventually took physical custody over the records. That much is true.
He declassified the papers marked āclassifiedā under any category. That you donāt know this or choose not to believe it is also doesnāt control. I cite Kash Patel. You? You cite nobody and nothing other than the markings that were on some documents when they initially got classified.
Itās quite relevant. Just admit you donāt know.Irrelevant to the fact that you don't know, yet insist on claiming that you do.
"....so many things which are claimed but not proven."
Nope. Itās a lie.No. Itās the truth. Your denial is the lie.
But we need to find out. Donāt you agree?I'm the one who pointed out that nobody knows....That would include me, schmuck.
You donāt declassify papers. You declassify information.
Doesnāt matter. He declassified the documents at issue. Whether or not you agree with his decision to do so is irrelevant.Without knowing what was on those papers, meaning without knowing what information is declassified, we donāt know what damage has been done to national security and what information the government should release to us.
No? How about for the immediate purpose of authorizing himself to have them in his physical possession outside of the White House. Try to think a bit before writing.It makes no sense that he would declassify information and not tell anyone.
In other words, you ignorantly just happen not to agree with or care for what he says. Thatās a different matter altogether. You remain wrong.Kash Patel makes no sense.
Deflection from the fact....You don't know, yet insist on invoking the narrative that it is known.But we need to find out. Donāt you agree?
Nobody disputes that documents seized had classified markings.
Because? At some point ā before being declassified ā they had been classified. Otherwise, they wouldnāt have needed to have been DEclassified.But we need to find out. Donāt you agree?
Nobody disputes that documents seized had classified markings.
Thatās not what declassify means.No? How about for the immediate purpose of authorizing himself to have them in his physical possession outside of the White House. Try to think a bit before writing.
Iām trying to explain this to you, but you have a hard time grasping simple questions. I have to break through your programming because youāre given prepared answers to questions, and when the question doesnāt fit, your programming breaks.Because? At some point ā before being declassified ā they had been classified. Otherwise, they wouldnāt have needed to have been DEclassified.
Honest to God. This isnāt even difficult material. Exactly how slow are you?
