BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 43,800
- 26,966
- 2,615
Unconstitutional. Roberts is the only one who can preside over the impeachment of a President, and Trump isn't in office. Enjoy your dream.Why not??Nope. She isn't going to preside over a trial of Trump. What are you smoking?Yea, and he can easily say he shouldn't preside because Trump is no longer a sitting president....It's not about what we want him to do. It's about how Roberts interprets the Constitution.Here is why you goofy ass Trumpers are so pathetic...And if he doesent are you going to impeach the the chief justice too?According to the Constitution, the chief justice doesn't have a choice....
If there is an impeachment trial, he must preside over it
On this very post you idiots go on and on about how Roberts is a Deep State traitor, blah blah - because he didn't do what you want him to do...
And yet, here you are saying "Wait you will see...Roberts is going to do exactly what I want him to do!!"
And when it doesn't happen....again.....due to Constitutional constraints......
Yall will revert right back to calling him RINOS, traitors, etc
I am sure you Trumpers are perfectly ok with Kamala presiding.....it plays in perfectly to your victim-hood fetish
Trump being convicted wouldn't result in Kamala being president...
That was the conflict of interest the framers were talking about...