When asked if he or rosenstein reviewed the evidence, he said, no, he took mueller's word as fact. So its "ALL". Pretty simple .Did he say he saw NONE of the evidence or did he say he didn't see ALL of the evidence? There's a big difference.
So he was supposed to NOT take Mueller's word as fact and delayed releasing the report for a month or so while he and a team of lawyers went over all the evidence, THAT would have made the haters happy?
Keep in mind that they were already chanting that he was hiding the report when he didn't release it within 48 hours.
Basically, the question was deliberately worded to allow weaseling.