Kansas Gov. Stands Up to Homo Mafia.

[SassyIrishLass]

Nobody should be offended at this. The homos swear they are not interested in religion or churches marrying them. LOL

Yes, and they also swear that marriage has absolutely nothing to do with children. So when this excellent and courageous governor acted on their behalf to protect them at Christian adoption agencies, the LGBT culties won't mind because "marriage is about adults, not children".

Oh, I didn't realize it made it difficult for them to get at children, that explains some of the wailing

 

[Syriusly]

Nobody should be offended at this. The homos swear they are not interested in religion or churches marrying them. LOL

Yes, and they also swear that marriage has absolutely nothing to do with children. So when this excellent and courageous governor acted on their behalf to protect them at Christian adoption agencies, the LGBT culties won't mind because "marriage is about adults, not children".

The governor did nothing courageous- Kansas adoption agencies can discriminate against Gays to your hearts content.

Kansas adoption agencies can keep kids in Foster care until they turn 18, and then dump them on the street, in order to avoid letting them have a gay family- all perfectly legal.

 

[Flash Farley]

I'll be banned shortly. See y'all later in another incarnation.

 

[Syriusly]

Nobody should be offended at this. The homos swear they are not interested in religion or churches marrying them. LOL

Yes, and they also swear that marriage has absolutely nothing to do with children. So when this excellent and courageous governor acted on their behalf to protect them at Christian adoption agencies, the LGBT culties won't mind because "marriage is about adults, not children".

Oh, I didn't realize it made it difficult for them to get at children, that explains some of the wailing

Doesn't change a thing about adoption in Kansas.

 

[Flash Farley]

Nobody should be offended at this. The homos swear they are not interested in religion or churches marrying them. LOL

Yes, and they also swear that marriage has absolutely nothing to do with children. So when this excellent and courageous governor acted on their behalf to protect them at Christian adoption agencies, the LGBT culties won't mind because "marriage is about adults, not children".

The governor did nothing courageous- Kansas adoption agencies can discriminate against Gays to your hearts content.

Kansas adoption agencies can keep kids in Foster care until they turn 18, and then dump them on the street, in order to avoid letting them have a gay family- all perfectly legal.

Yep, we're gonna indoctrinate them to hate homos like you trash do to hate Christians.

 

[Silhouette]

Nobody should be offended at this. The homos swear they are not interested in religion or churches marrying them. LOL

Yes, and they also swear that marriage has absolutely nothing to do with children. So when this excellent and courageous governor acted on their behalf to protect them at Christian adoption agencies, the LGBT culties won't mind because "marriage is about adults, not children".

Oh, I didn't realize it made it difficult for them to get at children, that explains some of the wailing

Well you missed the bit I wrote about lesbians now having to admit they need a man, and gay men having to admit they need a woman if they want the lesbian-to-gay-male child trafficking..er..I mean surrogate pregnancy racket to continue. There's a poster here who sold her ...womb services..in the form of two baby boys to a gay male couple.

 

[bendog]

I'll be banned shortly. See y'all later in another incarnation.

Incarnation! Better not set foot in Kansas, they don't put up with that Hindu heresy. You could find yousaf (-: in a heap a' trubble, boy.

 

[mdk]

This Executive Order is nothing more then a solution in search of a problem.

The only problem will be when homos start demanding churches marry them. Then they will have a huge problem

I agree but churches haven't been forced to marry anyone that they didn't want to and nor should they be forced to do so.

I think this is a shot across the bow.

I think this was a waste of pen ink.

Your opinion

Indeed, it is but it is a fact that there hasn't been a single forced to marry any couple against their wishes. A Hindu couple can't walk into a Catholic Cathedral and demand a priest marry them. Or Muslim couple walk into a Synagogue and demand Rabbi marry them. This E.O. literally changes nothing.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Nobody should be offended at this. The homos swear they are not interested in religion or churches marrying them. LOL

Yes, and they also swear that marriage has absolutely nothing to do with children. So when this excellent and courageous governor acted on their behalf to protect them at Christian adoption agencies, the LGBT culties won't mind because "marriage is about adults, not children".

Oh, I didn't realize it made it difficult for them to get at children, that explains some of the wailing

Doesn't change a thing about adoption in Kansas.

Sure it does, the Church is who we adopted our daughter through, not a snowball's chance in hell would they have ever given her to a homo couple. Nada, no way, not happening

 

[g5000]

Yep, we're gonna indoctrinate them to hate homos like you trash do to hate Christians.

"...a person who has a martyr complex, sometimes associated with the term victim complex, desires the feeling of being a martyr for his/her own sake, seeking out suffering or persecution because it either feeds a psychological need, or a desire to avoid responsibility."

 

[Syriusly]

This Executive Order is nothing more then a solution in search of a problem.

The only problem will be when homos start demanding churches marry them. Then they will have a huge problem

No more a problem than when blacks starting demanding churches marry them.

Or when Jews starting demanding churches marry them.

Or when Mormons started demanding that churches marry them.

Or when Lithuanians started demanding that churches marry them.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The only problem will be when homos start demanding churches marry them. Then they will have a huge problem

I agree but churches haven't been forced to marry anyone that they didn't want to and nor should they be forced to do so.

I think this is a shot across the bow.

I think this was a waste of pen ink.

Your opinion

Indeed, it is but it is a fact that there hasn't been a single forced to marry any couple against their wishes. A Hindu couple can't walk into a Catholic Cathedral and demand a priest marry them. Or Muslim couple walk into a Synagogue and demand Rabbi marry them. This E.O. literally changes nothing.

Not yet, keep in mind bakers were not being forced to bake queer cakes until recently. I've often wondered if that had happened before

 

[Syriusly]

Nobody should be offended at this. The homos swear they are not interested in religion or churches marrying them. LOL

Yes, and they also swear that marriage has absolutely nothing to do with children. So when this excellent and courageous governor acted on their behalf to protect them at Christian adoption agencies, the LGBT culties won't mind because "marriage is about adults, not children".

Oh, I didn't realize it made it difficult for them to get at children, that explains some of the wailing

Doesn't change a thing about adoption in Kansas.

Sure it does, the Church is who we adopted our daughter through, not a snowball's chance in hell would they have ever given her to a homo couple. Nada, no way, not happening

Does not change a thing in Kansas.

Any organization can discriminate against any homosexual or any homosexual couple- there is no Kansas law which prohibits discrimination based upon sexual orientation- so yes- theoretically an adoption agency in Kansas could refuse to adopt to hetero couples.

The governors proclamation is legally meaningless- but does appeal to his base of ignorant idiots.

 

[g5000]

Not yet, keep in mind bakers were not being forced to bake queer cakes until recently. I've often wondered if that had happened before

"The desire for martyrdom is sometimes considered a form of masochism..."

 

[bendog]

I'll be banned shortly. See y'all later in another incarnation.

Incarnation! Better not set foot in Kansas, they don't put up with that Hindu heresy. You could find yousaf (-: in a heap a' trubble, boy.

You're just upset because your computer with child porn crashed.

Lol. You have been so cyber punked. LOL

And really, couldn't the biblically correct Kansas pastors paint their churchdoors with lambs blood so the dreaded gay activists will pass by their churches?

 

[Syriusly]

I agree but churches haven't been forced to marry anyone that they didn't want to and nor should they be forced to do so.

I think this is a shot across the bow.

I think this was a waste of pen ink.

Your opinion

Indeed, it is but it is a fact that there hasn't been a single forced to marry any couple against their wishes. A Hindu couple can't walk into a Catholic Cathedral and demand a priest marry them. Or Muslim couple walk into a Synagogue and demand Rabbi marry them. This E.O. literally changes nothing.

Not yet, keep in mind bakers were not being forced to bake queer cakes until recently. I've often wondered if that had happened before

What exactly makes a cake 'queer'? Is it baked that way- or does the cake decide to be 'queer'?

Is the cake queer if it is attracted to other cakes? Or only if it has intercourse with another cake?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Just when you thought the ridiculous right couldn't get more ridiculous...

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Nobody should be offended at this. The homos swear they are not interested in religion or churches marrying them. LOL

Yes, and they also swear that marriage has absolutely nothing to do with children. So when this excellent and courageous governor acted on their behalf to protect them at Christian adoption agencies, the LGBT culties won't mind because "marriage is about adults, not children".

Oh, I didn't realize it made it difficult for them to get at children, that explains some of the wailing

Doesn't change a thing about adoption in Kansas.

Sure it does, the Church is who we adopted our daughter through, not a snowball's chance in hell would they have ever given her to a homo couple. Nada, no way, not happening

Does not change a thing in Kansas.

Any organization can discriminate against any homosexual or any homosexual couple- there is no Kansas law which prohibits discrimination based upon sexual orientation- so yes- theoretically an adoption agency in Kansas could refuse to adopt to hetero couples.

The governors proclamation is legally meaningless- but does appeal to his base of ignorant idiots.

You sound upset....

 

[mdk]

I agree but churches haven't been forced to marry anyone that they didn't want to and nor should they be forced to do so.

I think this is a shot across the bow.

I think this was a waste of pen ink.

Your opinion

Indeed, it is but it is a fact that there hasn't been a single forced to marry any couple against their wishes. A Hindu couple can't walk into a Catholic Cathedral and demand a priest marry them. Or Muslim couple walk into a Synagogue and demand Rabbi marry them. This E.O. literally changes nothing.

Not yet, keep in mind bakers were not being forced to bake queer cakes until recently. I've often wondered if that had happened before

Churches are not subject to public accommodation laws. They never have and they never should be. Besides, I am down with scrapping PA laws almost entirely. Let these businesses serve or not serve whomever they please and let the free market sort it.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I think this is a shot across the bow.

I think this was a waste of pen ink.

Your opinion

Indeed, it is but it is a fact that there hasn't been a single forced to marry any couple against their wishes. A Hindu couple can't walk into a Catholic Cathedral and demand a priest marry them. Or Muslim couple walk into a Synagogue and demand Rabbi marry them. This E.O. literally changes nothing.

Not yet, keep in mind bakers were not being forced to bake queer cakes until recently. I've often wondered if that had happened before

Churches are not subject to public accommodation laws. They never have and they never should be. Besides, I am down with scrapping PA laws almost entirely. Let these businesses serve or not serve whomever they please and let the free market sort it.

You and I are in a agreement on the PA laws