toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
but the tough part still lies ahead: proving beyond a reasonable doubt (Count II) that ballot printer problems on Election Day were intentional, designed to affect the results of the election
And here is where I find the court in total bullshit.
- No normal trial like this would go to court first without six months for the prosecution to prepare its case, yet this is being railroaded through with only a couple of DAYS to prepare, in an obvious effort to bias the entire case against Lake as judges are risk-adverse and really don't like rocking the boat.
- 80% of her points of contention were thrown out including her best one about the faulty signature verification, when I can testify that signature verification is a joke at best with people with no expertise or training just GUESSING. There is actually only about 200 people in this country legally court qualified to be able to truly differentiate a legit signature from a forged one.
- Proving they INTENDED to defraud the election may be well near impossible, certainly not without a lot more time, proving the court really isn't interested in getting at the truth. And it should not be the crucial point anyway; just demonstrating that large numbers of people did not get the chance to vote or get their ballots counted properly, whether accidental or deliberate, should be enough to trigger redoing the election--- THIS TIME without Katie Hobbs in charge.