Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Time to call for a special election.
You obviously didn’t watch any of it.Thats only what Kari CLAIMED, not the actual facts the defense presented and claimed....
You're only getting one side of the story, and not viewing both sides.....in the trial.
Hahaha, damn these people are desperate. They claim that these 42.5% were 20” ballots instead of 19” ballots which makes them invalid. No mention of the fact that even if a ballot didn’t get read by a machine it would still get counted. Dumb excuse #1…. What’s next?
If that is true and they didn’t get counted by the machine then they are put aside and counted by hand…. So what’s your issue?The larger ballots could not be fed into the machines.
They "jammed" the machines in the Republican districts and delayed voting - but unlike Georgia where democrats were delayed, no extensions of voting occurred., instead Republican voters were disenfranchised, as planned.If that is true and they didn’t get counted by the machine then they are put aside and counted by hand…. So what’s your issue?
That’s bullshit. If you can’t show the damages then you’re just making them up. Maybe these disenfranchised voters were Dems and maybe they should do mail in for future elections if they don’t have the time or patience to wait.They "jammed" the machines in the Republican districts and delayed voting - but unlike Georgia where democrats were delayed, no extensions of voting occurred., instead Republican voters were disenfranchised, as planned.
It's election fraud.
You support it - I don't.
There will be no admonitions of the electoral process. Hobbs did nothing wrong.We'll see, won't we?
BTW, what do you say I "claimed?" That they won't throw out the election? So you think they will?
I hope you're right, but I just don't see it.
That’s bullshit.
If you can’t show the damages then you’re just making them up. Maybe these disenfranchised voters were Dems and maybe they should do mail in for future elections if they don’t have the time or patience to wait.
There will be no admonitions of the electoral process. Hobbs did nothing wrong.
Excellent so when he shoots down Lakes case I don’t want to hear you whining about commie judgesWrong, that is established fact.
That will be up to the judge - who does not appear to be a minion of your Reich.
You're slobbering now? Did you see a picture of a goat, or something?
The larger ballots could not be fed into the machines.
They "jammed" the machines in the Republican districts and delayed voting - but unlike Georgia where democrats were delayed, no extensions of voting occurred., instead Republican voters were disenfranchised, as planned.
It's election fraud.
You support it - I don't.
Excellent so when he shoots down Lakes case I don’t want to hear you whining about commie judges
Nope.....they tried several times to count those ballots and the machines wouldn't take them.....so they put them in a blue box and claimed they would count them later.He claims that 19" ballots printed on 20" inch paper were not counted. That's bullshit, they were counted. The defense pointed out ballots rejected by a tabulator were later duplicated and counted.
Yeah.....cuz they were too black to get proper I.D.No one was disenfranchised, nazi. If people decided to leave rather than vote, that's their choice.
Nope.....they tried several times to count those ballots and the machines wouldn't take them.....so they put them in a blue box and claimed they would count them later.
Nobody knows whether they were ever really counted because of the break in custody of ballots in the AZ election.
That's not what I've read, IDIOT!@!!!Idiot, look at the trial. They said rejected ballots are "duplicated" and then the duplicates are fed into the tabulators. The votes are counted. You'd know that if you weren't a brain-dead con.
Actually copied and then counted by machine with both Dems and Republicans present.If that is true and they didn’t get counted by the machine then they are put aside and counted by hand…. So what’s your issue?
At 8:50 of this video they explained how they dealt with ballots that wouldn't scan.Idiot, look at the trial. They said rejected ballots are "duplicated" and then the duplicates are fed into the tabulators. The votes are counted. You'd know that if you weren't a brain-dead con.
