Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
EVery decent rational person is "foaming under the armpits" over this sleazy attempt to destroy a decent man. The people who support this maneuver are lying pieces of shit who have no honor, ethics or integrity. That means you, douchebag.Fox really has Trumpdrones foaming under the armpits over this one dont they ?
What "Democrat game" is Dr. Ford playing? Please enlighten us. Sounds to me like she wants facts before a hearing.
Maybe she wants the FBI to explain to her why when she talked to her therapist there were 4 people in the room with her... then later there were only two. Then the FBI can tell her where she was, and when she was there and who she was with... seems to me you need to have your facts before you make an accusation. Maybe the FBI can also tell us if the accuser was also drinking alcohol at this party... because if she was.... we would like to know how much because something has seemed to affect her memory here
Dr. Ford has already clarified that. She said it was the therapist's error.
Good to know. Now the notes by the Therapist is inadmissible.
One less piece of evidence Dr. Ford has.
Do you understand, even a little bit what you just said? The evidence is unreliable.
They evidence can be verified and corrected as needed. There is also Dr. Ford's husband and other witnesses that have reportedly come forward.
They evidence can be verified and corrected as needed
evidence can be corrected as needed? You mean evidence can be changed to fit the story? Yeah.... we all gathered that much by now.
Why should anyone feel sorry for that piece of shit. Such an attitude presumes there is some merit to her sleazy claims. She's obviously just a political operative who is trying to take out a conservative nominee. As someone recently stated, she's lower than squid shit.Hmm...
You can't help but feel sorry for Ford when she requested to remain anonymous, yet she was betrayed by Feinstein and outed for nothing but partisan politics. Not only are they ruining an innocent man's life, they have turned her life upside down in the process.
Do Democrats like Lakhota care about such things? No. They do not. They leap at fantasies rather than facts. They are consumed by their hatred of the other side and don't care who they hurt in the meantime.
Ford thought she could destroy the man with no consequences for her. Frankenstein was probably even promising her as much. Anyone who thinks the kookoobird did this over her own volition is terminally naive.Why should anyone feel sorry for that piece of shit. Such an attitude presumes there is some merit to her sleazy claims. She's obviously just a political operative who is trying to take out a conservative nominee. As someone recently stated, she's lower than squid shit.Hmm...
You can't help but feel sorry for Ford when she requested to remain anonymous, yet she was betrayed by Feinstein and outed for nothing but partisan politics. Not only are they ruining an innocent man's life, they have turned her life upside down in the process.
Do Democrats like Lakhota care about such things? No. They do not. They leap at fantasies rather than facts. They are consumed by their hatred of the other side and don't care who they hurt in the meantime.
Regardless of who Ford is or isn't, you saw the true character of a politician when she (the senator) stabbed her in the back. Oh well. She chose to play this game too. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Isn't this fiasco with the skank more of Dem fear that it will get before the election? Why do you think their calling for an FBI investigation of something that didn't happen 36 years ago.?That sounds more like the fear of the GOP. They're desperate to get this done before the midterms.Democrats are afraid of the vote on Kavanaugh and they're butthurt about not going 5-4 on SCOTUS because of Garland. Ginsberg is going to die and and Thomas is going to retire in a year, so 6-3. Suck it up snowflakes.Sure it does. A single hearing with two witnesses does not get to any of the facts.
An investigation will.
What are you afraid of?
/——-/ But But But it’s the word of a woman and you require no proof of the slut whore’s accusation to destroy a man’s careeer. Why the double standard?What hor$e$hit.../----/ Here it is again for you slow reading libtards:Typical TrumpBot Misogyny... paying attention, Ladies? Remember this in November....The only cloud is on the whore and her bogus claim.
Fox really has Trumpdrones foaming under the armpits over this one dont they ?
Hmm...
You can't help but feel sorry for Ford when she requested to remain anonymous, yet she was betrayed by Feinstein and outed for nothing but partisan politics. Not only are they ruining an innocent man's life, they have turned her life upside down in the process.
Do Democrats like Lakhota care about such things? No. They do not. They leap at fantasies rather than facts. They are consumed by their hatred of the other side and don't care who they hurt in the meantime.
The FBI Could Look Into Allegations Against Kavanaugh. Trump Doesn’t Want It To.
Why? What are they hiding? What are they afraid of? FBI was ordered to investigate Anita Hill allegations against Clarence Thomas - and that was 27 years ago.
Not with all that has come to light and Ford playing the Democrat Game
What "Democrat game" is Dr. Ford playing? Please enlighten us. Sounds to me like she wants facts before a hearing.
Maybe she wants the FBI to explain to her why when she talked to her therapist there were 4 people in the room with her... then later there were only two. Then the FBI can tell her where she was, and when she was there and who she was with... seems to me you need to have your facts before you make an accusation. Maybe the FBI can also tell us if the accuser was also drinking alcohol at this party... because if she was.... we would like to know how much because something has seemed to affect her memory here
Dr. Ford has already clarified that. She said it was the therapist's error.
Not with all that has come to light and Ford playing the Democrat Game
What "Democrat game" is Dr. Ford playing? Please enlighten us. Sounds to me like she wants facts before a hearing.
Maybe she wants the FBI to explain to her why when she talked to her therapist there were 4 people in the room with her... then later there were only two. Then the FBI can tell her where she was, and when she was there and who she was with... seems to me you need to have your facts before you make an accusation. Maybe the FBI can also tell us if the accuser was also drinking alcohol at this party... because if she was.... we would like to know how much because something has seemed to affect her memory here
Dr. Ford has already clarified that. She said it was the therapist's error.
Of course. When a written record of something she told someone conflicts with what she's saying now, the written record is wrong, but we're supposed to rely on the written record as proof that what she's saying now is true?
verified and corrected as needed?Not with all that has come to light and Ford playing the Democrat Game
What "Democrat game" is Dr. Ford playing? Please enlighten us. Sounds to me like she wants facts before a hearing.
Maybe she wants the FBI to explain to her why when she talked to her therapist there were 4 people in the room with her... then later there were only two. Then the FBI can tell her where she was, and when she was there and who she was with... seems to me you need to have your facts before you make an accusation. Maybe the FBI can also tell us if the accuser was also drinking alcohol at this party... because if she was.... we would like to know how much because something has seemed to affect her memory here
Dr. Ford has already clarified that. She said it was the therapist's error.
Good to know. Now the notes by the Therapist is inadmissible.
One less piece of evidence Dr. Ford has.
Do you understand, even a little bit what you just said? The evidence is unreliable.
They evidence can be verified and corrected as needed. There is also Dr. Ford's husband and other witnesses that have reportedly come forward.
The therapist taking notes in real time, the muddle headed alky relying on memory....Not with all that has come to light and Ford playing the Democrat Game
What "Democrat game" is Dr. Ford playing? Please enlighten us. Sounds to me like she wants facts before a hearing.
Maybe she wants the FBI to explain to her why when she talked to her therapist there were 4 people in the room with her... then later there were only two. Then the FBI can tell her where she was, and when she was there and who she was with... seems to me you need to have your facts before you make an accusation. Maybe the FBI can also tell us if the accuser was also drinking alcohol at this party... because if she was.... we would like to know how much because something has seemed to affect her memory here
Dr. Ford has already clarified that. She said it was the therapist's error.
It can't be a criminal investigation, Idiot. The statute of limitation has long since expiredFord’s lawyers released a letter to committee chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), CNN reported, calling for an investigation to “ensure the crucial facts and witnesses in this matter are assessed in a non-partisan manner and that the committee is fully informed before conducting any hearing or making any decision.”
Speaking with CNN’s Anderson Cooper on Tuesday, attorney Lisa Banks reiterated that her client was “prepared to cooperate with the committee and with any law enforcement investigation.”
Christine Blasey Ford Calls On FBI To Investigate Kavanaugh Accusation Before Hearing
Good for her! Even Kavanaugh should want a thorough investigation - otherwise this cloud of doubt and suspicion will hang over him.
The FBI does not investigate allegations that are 40 years old that are not federal crimes nor should they
The statute of limitations on this alleged crime expired long ago hence it is no longer a matter for any branch of law enforcement
It wouldn't be a criminal investigation, fool.
No, not really.
so this isn't about kavanaugh and his past history, it's about roe vs wade? did you just admit that?
