Kavanaugh accuser wants FBI investigation before hearing

...What a ridiculous post....
Thank you for your feedback.

...Who else is the onus on?...
Everyone who cannot empathize with the fear gripping a 15-year-old so tightly that she clammed-up about it for decades.

--------------------

I'm not talking about the burden of reporting...

I'm talking about the lack of empathy for failing to understand why a victim would wait for so long before coming forward...

The numbers of people who do this... waiting for decades... is legion...

If her story is true, then, she demonstrated legendary patriotism in putting herself through all this for the good of the Republic...

If her story is true, then, by coming forward, she becomes an American Hero...

We will never know the truth, unless Mark Judge demonstrates similar courage, and testifies, and even then...

But we can get "in the neighborhood" of the truth; sufficient to use in a holistic measure of the personal character of a nominee...

That's why the FBI needs to re-engage, amend its findings, and report back to Congress, revising a closed background investigation.

How is her making up this story good for the Republic? This guy has led a stellar life and worked his way to this position, and now she's trying to ruin it for him and the Republicans.
 
This should be investigated. Period.

Ford should have hired investigators to look into it then. She had plenty of time; 36 years. She's a college professor, she could afford it. So why didn't she?

Because she does not have to apparently. It's ridiculous.

It's PC 'understandable' if they do not report it. But it's 'brave' if they do.

In other words...no matter what they do...they are fantastic.

Nonsense.

You get sexually abused - report it. You do that...THEN you are fantastic.
Don't report it? And you are just a weak, selfish victim. Who let's her assailant get away with it to rape another innocent person.

The fact that Ford did not report it 36 years ago definitely hurts her case, IMO.
 
Feinstein did not commit the act. This should be investigated. Maybe you need to experience being sexually assaulted to understand why women don't want to say anything about it. I don't need that to happen to ne in order to understand why Feinstein complied the wishes of the individual as long as she could.
:bsflag:

If this was a democratic nominee you'd be demanding investigations, so the only BS s coming from those like you.
Baloney.............No charges can come of this.

She does not have witnesses to back up her claim.

The 4 she says were present when it happened deny that it happened.........

Game ...........Set..............match.............this is BS.........and a Democratic BS game that they have played before.

Seems that she does have witnesses. On top of that only 35-36 percent of the American people approve of this guy being confirmed.

All her witnesses say she's FOS. The latest one is described as a close friend of hers.

Ray, you are talking to a man who actually has read the comments. OK? So your fox news lies aren't going anywhere here. Her friends said nothing of the sort.
 
...How is her making up this story good for the Republic?...
Making up and spreading a false story would be very bad for the Republic.

If that proves to be the case, I would fully support (metaphorically) crucifying her in the criminal courts.

If Franken(Fein)stein was knowingly complicit in facilitating that, she gets the same treatment.

If, however, Blasey-Ford is telling the truth about a potential Supreme Court justice, then she is a Hero of the Republic for outing him.


...This guy has led a stellar life and worked his way to this position, and now she's trying to ruin it for him and the Republicans.
If he did not do as Blasey-Ford says he did, then, I completely agree with you.

If, however, he did what Blasey-Ford says he did, then she is helping the Republic to dodge a bullet.

---------------

We need to find out whether Blasey-Ford's story is true, not dismiss it as false out-of-hand, before the details are even known.

We need to have an objective third-party professional investigative research organization conduct a brief fact-finding exercise.

The FBI conducts background investigations for Supreme Court nominees; focusing on all aspects of their lives up to that point.

The FBI closed their most recent investigation before the Blasey-Ford accusation went public.

That means that the FBI has unfinished business with respect to that closed investigation.

The FBI needs to reopen that file long enough to gather facts pertaining to these allegations and amend its findings.

To do anything else does an injustice to the Republic at large, as well as Blasey-Ford, and even Kavanagh.
 
That's exactly why the FBI needs to re-engage... a good-faith due-diligence effort to get us sufficiently close to the truth, to assess.

They can't get any closer than we are now. Here's what I want you and your ilk to do: think of 5 questions you would ask anybody involved in this case. WTF could you ask? And I don't mean 5 anything questions, I mean 5 questions that could possibly bring us anywhere closer than we are now.

Which is exactly why the FBI needs to re-engage.

Only if teen house parties are a federal crime.

Au contraire... the FBI conducts the background investigations for SCOTUS nominees... including personal character attributions.

That makes it a Federal issue.

And that's what they did--6 times.

Nobody's looking to prosecute... merely to complete an extensive background investigation...

You know...the kind of thing that the FBI does all the time for prospective high government officials.

Yes they did, and again, 6 times. What you are asking for is an investigation, not a background check. The libs are using the term Background Check to launch an investigation.

A background check consists of looking at any criminal history (that's documented) seeing if you had any associations with terrorists and criminals, seeing if you involved in any criminal case of another, look into what clubs you joined in the past; what kind of organizations. That's a background check.

An investigation is when you go out and interrogate people. An investigation is to find evidence of a crime. That's what you're looking for. It's also why the FBI laughed at the suggestion.
 

If this was a democratic nominee you'd be demanding investigations, so the only BS s coming from those like you.
Baloney.............No charges can come of this.

She does not have witnesses to back up her claim.

The 4 she says were present when it happened deny that it happened.........

Game ...........Set..............match.............this is BS.........and a Democratic BS game that they have played before.

Seems that she does have witnesses. On top of that only 35-36 percent of the American people approve of this guy being confirmed.

All her witnesses say she's FOS. The latest one is described as a close friend of hers.

Ray, you are talking to a man who actually has read the comments. OK? So your fox news lies aren't going anywhere here. Her friends said nothing of the sort.

POSTED ON SEPTEMBER 22, 2018 BY PAUL MIRENGOFF IN BRETT KAVANAUGH

REPORT: YET ANOTHER “WITNESS” FAILS TO BACK FORD’S STORY

CNN reports that Senate Judiciary Committee staff has spoken with a high school friend of Christine Blasey who, supposedly, was at the party where Brett Kavanaugh supposedly assaulted Blasey. The woman is Leland Ingham Keyser. Reportedly, she is a lifelong friend of Blasey (now, Blasey Ford).

According to CNN, Ms. Keyser’s lawyer stated:

Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.

Report: Yet another 'witness' fails to back Ford's story

Good enough for you?
 
Last edited:

Sure she did. She didn’t have to make things up
Well she sure did not give enough info, to make her case. Who she made. What, when, where, how, why, and much more is needed to make any crime complete. Judging from her yearbook from school its filled with drunk parties, sexual incidents, by the girls who when to school there. Wonder is she was a drunk during that time or needed to be sent to a rehab place to dry out that summer. She needed a clear mind for details for the degrees she has, so why does she not remember so much at this time....suspicious.

I could see her being that hazy on the details if the incident wasn't really that important to her at the time. There's no way I'm buying it if it "traumatized" her for 30 years.
 
GOP Aide In Kavanaugh Confirmation Resigns As Sexual Harassment Claim Surfaces

Garrett Ventry’s exit marks another moment of turmoil in Kavanaugh’s confirmation.

Garrett Ventry, a communications adviser to the Senate Judiciary Committee, has abruptly resigned after NBC News inquired about a past sexual harassment allegation against him.

GOP AIDE FOR KAV HEARINGS RESIGNS: HARASSMENT PAST!

Another GOP pervert bites the dust.

When do we get to see the first DEM pervert who isn't supported and defended to the high heavens?

All you've just told us that the GOP cares about things like that, and the Democrats don't.
 
This should be investigated. Period.
Feinstein should be investigated. Why didn't she share this letter when she first got it in July?

Feinstein did not commit the act. This should be investigated. Maybe you need to experience being sexually assaulted to understand why women don't want to say anything about it. I don't need that to happen to ne in order to understand why Feinstein complied the wishes of the individual as long as she could.
:bsflag:

If this was a democratic nominee you'd be demanding investigations, so the only BS s coming from those like you.
When has it ever happened to a Democrat nominee? It doesn't because Republicans aren't shameless scumbags like Democrats are.
 
This will rap up this week and he will be voted on..............the only question is will any Republicans fold like cheap suits in the vote with the election close.

Why will this end..............because the next crisis is waiting...............the Budget crisis.............

A NEW CIRCUS comes to town this week.
 
This should be investigated. Period.
Feinstein should be investigated. Why didn't she share this letter when she first got it in July?

Feinstein did not commit the act. This should be investigated. Maybe you need to experience being sexually assaulted to understand why women don't want to say anything about it. I don't need that to happen to ne in order to understand why Feinstein complied the wishes of the individual as long as she could.
:bsflag:

If this was a democratic nominee you'd be demanding investigations, so the only BS s coming from those like you.
When has it ever happened to a Democrat nominee? It doesn't because Republicans aren't shameless scumbags like Democrats are.

You might want to repost this. :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 
Feinstein should be investigated. Why didn't she share this letter when she first got it in July?

Feinstein did not commit the act. This should be investigated. Maybe you need to experience being sexually assaulted to understand why women don't want to say anything about it. I don't need that to happen to ne in order to understand why Feinstein complied the wishes of the individual as long as she could.
:bsflag:

If this was a democratic nominee you'd be demanding investigations, so the only BS s coming from those like you.
When has it ever happened to a Democrat nominee? It doesn't because Republicans aren't shameless scumbags like Democrats are.

You might want to repost this. :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
No, I really don't.
 
Feinstein did not commit the act. This should be investigated. Maybe you need to experience being sexually assaulted to understand why women don't want to say anything about it. I don't need that to happen to ne in order to understand why Feinstein complied the wishes of the individual as long as she could.
:bsflag:

If this was a democratic nominee you'd be demanding investigations, so the only BS s coming from those like you.
When has it ever happened to a Democrat nominee? It doesn't because Republicans aren't shameless scumbags like Democrats are.

You might want to repost this. :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
No, I really don't.

Yes you do. And especially because the last 2 democratic presidents had endless investigations on them for their entire terms with nothing found but a cum stained dress. You republicans are the scumbags.
 

If this was a democratic nominee you'd be demanding investigations, so the only BS s coming from those like you.
When has it ever happened to a Democrat nominee? It doesn't because Republicans aren't shameless scumbags like Democrats are.

You might want to repost this. :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
No, I really don't.

Yes you do. And especially because the last 2 democratic presidents had endless investigations on them for their entire terms with nothing found but a cum stained dress. You republicans are the scumbags.

What part of "nominee" didn't you understand? Congressional investigations are as common as dirt. The Dim ones have been show trials.
 
At this point the deal should be closed. We gave you yesterday until 10:00pm, and extended it to today at 2:00pm and you're still jacking us around. Deal off. There will be no testimony.

It's called negotiating. Is it too late for Kavanaugh to apologize?

It's called "you have no right to negotiate". Stop posturing and grandstanding, and speak or shut up.

Is it too late for Ford to apologize?
 
At this point the deal should be closed. We gave you yesterday until 10:00pm, and extended it to today at 2:00pm and you're still jacking us around. Deal off. There will be no testimony.
Do you know this for a fact?

The truth is, that, despite their bluster, GOP leadership is $hitting their pants over this, and dare not pull the plug, now.

The truth is that you're once again counting on public support you don't have.

The GOP has no reason to fear this, or you, and is 100% doing this because THEY actually care about the charges and the process, while the left only cares about the politics.
 
If this was a democratic nominee you'd be demanding investigations, so the only BS s coming from those like you.
When has it ever happened to a Democrat nominee? It doesn't because Republicans aren't shameless scumbags like Democrats are.

You might want to repost this. :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
No, I really don't.

Yes you do. And especially because the last 2 democratic presidents had endless investigations on them for their entire terms with nothing found but a cum stained dress. You republicans are the scumbags.

What part of "nominee" didn't you understand? Congressional investigations are as common as dirt. The Dim ones have been show trials.

All of it. And this is a show trial. Your party is crooked. That is a fact. Kavanaugh or Gorsuch, one of the 2 should not be either on the court or up for nomination. But you crooks decided not to let Obama get a justice and had Hillary won, you crooks would have stalled nominations for her whole term if necessary.
 

Forum List

Back
Top