Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anti-gun loons look forward to school shootings - it gives them an emotional weapons with which they can push for more gun control, and without which they know their efforts will continue to fail.You are one EVIL SOB. CHILDREN WERE KILLED BECAUSE OF YOUR STUPID IDEAS TO DISARM EVERYONE IN A SCHOOL TO LEAVE THE CHILDREN TO HIDE UNDER THEIR DESKS AND BECOME SHOOTING VICTIMS WHILE THE ADULTS STOOD AROUND TRYING TO COVER UP THE CHILDREN AND TAKE THE BULLETS. I don't neg very often buy you just earned one.
They belive that the more kids killed with a gun, the better.
GRR...
IMO The people who passed the law, signed the law, and implemented the law to disarm the school staff and thus aid and abet the killing of the children, should be tried and convicted of conspiracy to commit murder. No amount of punishment is enough for these people.
You are one EVIL SOB. CHILDREN WERE KILLED BECAUSE OF YOUR STUPID IDEAS TO DISARM EVERYONE IN A SCHOOL TO LEAVE THE CHILDREN TO HIDE UNDER THEIR DESKS AND BECOME SHOOTING VICTIMS WHILE THE ADULTS STOOD AROUND TRYING TO COVER UP THE CHILDREN AND TAKE THE BULLETS. I don't neg very often buy you just earned one.It's a misnomer to believe that if gun laws had been non-existent that there would have been shooting back. Likely not in Columbine, Sandyhook, VA Tech, etc...
As for the question
It's a very long term proposition but the only way to effectively attack the problem is to begin to attack the supply and you do that by decreasing the demand.
Tax the holy crap out of firearms and ammunition. Pass laws making it a requirement that gun owners carry liabiltiy insurance per weapon--very expensive.
Also, make all gun crimes federal crimes and steep minimum sentences for armed robbery. You use a gun, you're going away for 20 years; no parole, no time off for good behavior, soyanara.
Basically make firearms the equivalent of cigarettes.
As stated it's a long-term proposition but the sooner we get started...
bump
You are one EVIL SOB. CHILDREN WERE KILLED BECAUSE OF YOUR STUPID IDEAS TO DISARM EVERYONE IN A SCHOOL TO LEAVE THE CHILDREN TO HIDE UNDER THEIR DESKS AND BECOME SHOOTING VICTIMS WHILE THE ADULTS STOOD AROUND TRYING TO COVER UP THE CHILDREN AND TAKE THE BULLETS. I don't neg very often buy you just earned one.bump
So ... Adam Lanza was just an innocent bystander.
Logical yoga. Whatever it takes, right?
Shall not infringe INCLUDES not placing a punitive tax on an item to bar low income from exercising their rights under the Constitution. You nor your party can justify insurance on gun owners and again that would be an infringement of the right to bear arms designed to punitively prevent citizens from exercising the right.
As for making all firearm crimes federal that too is unconstitutional as the Fed can not usurp State powers from them any more then States can usurp Federal powers.
Don't expect an answer. Candy doesn't address irrelevant points or questions. You know, like asking her to address the op...
Shall not infringe INCLUDES not placing a punitive tax on an item to bar low income from exercising their rights under the Constitution. You nor your party can justify insurance on gun owners and again that would be an infringement of the right to bear arms designed to punitively prevent citizens from exercising the right.
As for making all firearm crimes federal that too is unconstitutional as the Fed can not usurp State powers from them any more then States can usurp Federal powers.
Don't expect an answer. Candy doesn't address irrelevant points or questions. You know, like asking her to address the op...
Replace the tax with liability insurance on each firearm...there, problem solved. Currently, if your gun kills someone, it's totally up to the deceased to pay for their funeral, loss of income, pain and suffering, etc... You get jail time which does little to compensate your victims.
Liability insurance instead of taxes. Cha-ching!
As far as making crimes federal crimes, it can be done...as always, the gun nuts are just full of excuses; not solutions.
Addressed. Fail.Replace the tax with liability insurance on each firearmShall not infringe INCLUDES not placing a punitive tax on an item to bar low income from exercising their rights under the Constitution. You nor your party can justify insurance on gun owners and again that would be an infringement of the right to bear arms designed to punitively prevent citizens from exercising the right.
As for making all firearm crimes federal that too is unconstitutional as the Fed can not usurp State powers from them any more then States can usurp Federal powers.
Don't expect an answer. Candy doesn't address irrelevant points or questions. You know, like asking her to address the op...
I am sure you know people can sue for wrongful death - thus, your statement, above. is a lie.Currently, if your gun kills someone, it's totally up to the deceased to pay for their funeral, loss of income, pain and suffering, etc.
Addressed. Fail.As far as making crimes federal crimes, it can be done.
They bevieve everyone should be dependent on the state for their security (and everything else) and so are more than happy to create a nation of innoect people devoid of effective means to defend themselves.Don't expect an answer. Candy doesn't address irrelevant points or questions. You know, like asking her to address the op...
Replace the tax with liability insurance on each firearm...there, problem solved. Currently, if your gun kills someone, it's totally up to the deceased to pay for their funeral, loss of income, pain and suffering, etc... You get jail time which does little to compensate your victims.
Liability insurance instead of taxes. Cha-ching!
As far as making crimes federal crimes, it can be done...as always, the gun nuts are just full of excuses; not solutions.
Screw insurance. First you want to force people who don't need health care to buy health insurance instead of food for their children. Now you want to force innocent people to buy liability insurance before they are allowed to defend themselves from criminals. WTH is wrong with people like you?
Every time there's a shooting, liberals run around saying this proves we need more gun laws. I ask liberals over and over how exactly you are going to keep guns out of the hands of criminals every time you say you want more gun laws.
In particular, address given that drugs are illegal, and yet any parent knows any kid can get as much pot as they want. There are millions of guns in the US, millions more in the world. So don't just say more laws, explain how more laws are going to actually work.
So, there have been 7 shootings killing at least 10 people in the last decade. The only thing you've achieved so far is that no one was shooting back.
Every time there's a shooting, liberals run around saying this proves we need more gun laws. I ask liberals over and over how exactly you are going to keep guns out of the hands of criminals every time you say you want more gun laws.
In particular, address given that drugs are illegal, and yet any parent knows any kid can get as much pot as they want. There are millions of guns in the US, millions more in the world. So don't just say more laws, explain how more laws are going to actually work.
So, there have been 7 shootings killing at least 10 people in the last decade. The only thing you've achieved so far is that no one was shooting back.
Considering there are more than 300 million guns in private hands in this country your argument and premise is simply bullshit. And what is purely rigntwad masturbation porn is your first sentence. 300 million guns and nutters have failed to prevent or stop a single mass shooting.
... of which <0.0028% are used to commit murder, any argument/premise that we need additional gun contriol is simply bullshit.Considering there are more than 300 million guns in private hands in this country....
... of which <0.0028% are used to commit murder, any argument/premise that we need additional gun contriol is simply bullshit.Considering there are more than 300 million guns in private hands in this country....
How is it that gun-related crime is SO bad that we need to further restrict the rghts of the law abiding, but NOT so bad that the law-abiding have no legitimate need for a gun with which to defend themselves?
Every time there's a shooting, liberals run around saying this proves we need more gun laws. I ask liberals over and over how exactly you are going to keep guns out of the hands of criminals every time you say you want more gun laws.
In particular, address given that drugs are illegal, and yet any parent knows any kid can get as much pot as they want. There are millions of guns in the US, millions more in the world. So don't just say more laws, explain how more laws are going to actually work.
So, there have been 7 shootings killing at least 10 people in the last decade. The only thing you've achieved so far is that no one was shooting back.
Considering there are more than 300 million guns in private hands in this country your argument and premise is simply bullshit. And what is purely rigntwad masturbation porn is your first sentence. 300 million guns and nutters have failed to prevent or stop a single mass shooting.
Cool. Now what if you answer the question in the op like 140 pages ago. Why is this going to keep guns out of the hands of criminals when you can't even keep pot out of the hands of teenagers?Don't expect an answer. Candy doesn't address irrelevant points or questions. You know, like asking her to address the op...
Replace the tax with liability insurance on each firearm...there, problem solved. Currently, if your gun kills someone, it's totally up to the deceased to pay for their funeral, loss of income, pain and suffering, etc... You get jail time which does little to compensate your victims.
Liability insurance instead of taxes. Cha-ching!
As far as making crimes federal crimes, it can be done...as always, the gun nuts are just full of excuses; not solutions.
... of which <0.0028% are used to commit murder, any argument/premise that we need additional gun contriol is simply bullshit.Considering there are more than 300 million guns in private hands in this country....
How is it that gun-related crime is SO bad that we need to further restrict the rghts of the law abiding, but NOT so bad that the law-abiding have no legitimate need for a gun with which to defend themselves?
Easy, disarming the citizens is just one of the steps to the goal of converting the country to communism.
... of which <0.0028% are used to commit murder, any argument/premise that we need additional gun contriol is simply bullshit.
How is it that gun-related crime is SO bad that we need to further restrict the rghts of the law abiding, but NOT so bad that the law-abiding have no legitimate need for a gun with which to defend themselves?
Easy, disarming the citizens is just one of the steps to the goal of converting the country to communism.
"Communism"
Somebody hasn't turned his calendar over since 1954...
... of which <0.0028% are used to commit murder, any argument/premise that we need additional gun contriol is simply bullshit.Considering there are more than 300 million guns in private hands in this country....
How is it that gun-related crime is SO bad that we need to further restrict the rghts of the law abiding, but NOT so bad that the law-abiding have no legitimate need for a gun with which to defend themselves?
Easy, disarming the citizens is just one of the steps to the goal of converting the country to communism.
"Communism"
Somebody hasn't turned his calendar over since 1954...
Read the Communist manifesto and you'll notice not only the same concepts as the Democratic party platform but the same rhetoric.
"Communism"
Somebody hasn't turned his calendar over since 1954...
Read the Communist manifesto and you'll notice not only the same concepts as the Democratic party platform but the same rhetoric.
Ah, I stand corrected and duly amend: Two people haven't flipped their calendars since 1954.
Better?
Note: this is sarcasm and mocking of the far left.
Read the Communist manifesto and you'll notice not only the same concepts as the Democratic party platform but the same rhetoric.
Ah, I stand corrected and duly amend: Two people haven't flipped their calendars since 1954.
Better?
The communist manifesto isn't a calendar, it's a book that describes the philosophy of Karl Marx. He wrote it with Friedrich Engels. That's why they refer to communists as "Marxists."
Democrats have the same principles and use the same anti-rich, anti-capitalism rhetoric that Marx had in his book. That is what we are referring to.
BTW, you're about a hundred years off, it was written in 1848. It still wasn't written on a calendar though.
