Dogmaphobe
Diamond Member
- Sep 22, 2014
- 37,287
- 42,565
My OP is aimed principally at Donald Trump, not at the 17 year old kid.
The wannabe cop / vigilante clearly was acting as he thought he should, as his mother and his President encouraged him to. There is no denying that he was illegally roaming about three hours after curfew, acting as a fully armed vigilante 22 miles from home, and whatever his intentions his presence led to the unnecessary killing of two unarmed white guys who apparently rather foolishly (if heroically) tried to disarm him — because they perceived him as a threat or a fleeing shooter. They also had families and friends and loved ones and also thought they were there doing the right thing. One was a young father. Apparently one had medical training and brought a medical kit to treat others. Whatever the facts, the violence and deaths would never have occurred if the child vigilante and his mother did not think they were supported by our President. Many more will die unnecessarily if our President continues to encourage vigilante activities, and encourages the fantasy that our cities are filled with murderous BLM/Antifa rioters out to take over the country. This is part of his electoral strategy, which he believes — and may in fact — get him re-elected.
Your op was designed as a polemic clearly intended to show your support for domestic terrorism.
The fact that you are trying to rationalize that your child rapist and his accomplice who attempted to murder the boy were "doing the right thing" belies any possible protest you might offer that this is actually an attempt at a clean debate and not the sleazy attempt at pro-terrorist propaganda.
Last edited: