Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Firing people for their religious beliefs is illegal, turd.
No, a majority doensn't support gay marriage. You were lied to. .This is civil disobedience over the Constitution initiated by those who claim to love the Constitution.
They only like it when the Constitution is on their side. Now, they are at war against the Constitution.
Is this a rebellion against the US? Don't a majority of people (60%+) favor Gay Marriage? Not only don't they have the Constitution on their side they don't have the support of the majority of their fellow citizens.
But that's what to expect from radicals.
Firing people for their religious beliefs is illegal, turd.Fire them, done deal. Don't want to do the job you are being paid to do? Find another.
I'm guessing there will be a question added to the job app for states now.
Question 5:
"Can you properly conduct all duties required when taking this job based on your religious views? If not, thanks for stopping by."
Obama should do what Raygun did with the Air Traffic Controller union. Fire them all and hire people that aren't religious fanatics, and cite Raygun as the precedent.
Snap mfer!
If that's based on their religious beliefs, they can't be fired. What a catch-22 this is going to be. Enjoy.Firing people for their religious beliefs is illegal, turd.
Nobody is firing anyone for their religious beliefs. If they are fired, it is because of their inability/refusal to perform their basic job functions.
If that's based on their religious beliefs, they can't be fired. What a catch-22 this is going to be. Enjoy.
If that's based on their religious beliefs, they can't be fired. What a catch-22 this is going to be. Enjoy.Firing people for their religious beliefs is illegal, turd.
Nobody is firing anyone for their religious beliefs. If they are fired, it is because of their inability/refusal to perform their basic job functions.
You mean like the muslim broad who gets to wear her muslim headgear while working at Abercrombie and Fitch thanks to a Supreme Court ruling?Do they expect to get paid for not doing their job?
It appears to be that way. According to their statements, they are incapable of performing essential tasks of their positions. When someone tells me they aren't capable of doing their job, I wish them good fortunes and offer to give them a good reference if they need one.
Yup. If your religion makes your job impossible, find another job.
Big surprise.
Those Red states are filled with pig-fucking devils calling themselves "Christian".
Hardly. The fight between the cult of LGBT and Christians has just gotten off the ground. Christians are not going to exchange their immortal soul for a marriage license issuance, a cake or a bouqet of flowers. It's ON. And like another poster said, the Court is going to be very busy in the next couple years revisiting its mistake last Friday...Big surprise.
Those Red states are filled with pig-fucking devils calling themselves "Christian".
This is gonna be one of those eras that future Christians look back on....and try to revise.
Firing people for their religious beliefs is illegal, turd.Fire them, done deal. Don't want to do the job you are being paid to do? Find another.
I'm guessing there will be a question added to the job app for states now.
Question 5:
"Can you properly conduct all duties required when taking this job based on your religious views? If not, thanks for stopping by."
Obama should do what Raygun did with the Air Traffic Controller union. Fire them all and hire people that aren't religious fanatics, and cite Raygun as the precedent.
Snap mfer!
Hardly. The fight between the cult of LGBT and Christians has just gotten off the ground. Christians are not going to exchange their immortal soul for a marriage license issuance, a cake or a bouqet of flowers. It's ON. And like another poster said, the Court is going to be very busy in the next couple years revisiting its mistake last Friday...Big surprise.
Those Red states are filled with pig-fucking devils calling themselves "Christian".
This is gonna be one of those eras that future Christians look back on....and try to revise.
If LGBTs even understood their etiology and weren't merely deviant sex behaviors, we wouldn't even be having this conversation. But being behaviors was a precedent the Court should not have willfully ignored to render a false conclusion..
Ah...this is another RW fail comparison. It was so off (apples and oranges) it wasn't evident. You guys need to label those things.Who's gone to jail over this....only one I see going to jail with their head held high is that woman who took down the traitor flag in South Carolina.Some Kentucky county clerks refuse to issue marriage licenses following same-sex marriage ruling.
Cutting off your nose to spite your face- that will show your nose!
So MLK going to jail over laws he saw as unjust was cutting off his nose to spite his face?
It's a comparison, and you obviously didn't get it.
Firing people for their religious beliefs is illegal, turd.Fire them, done deal. Don't want to do the job you are being paid to do? Find another.
I'm guessing there will be a question added to the job app for states now.
Question 5:
"Can you properly conduct all duties required when taking this job based on your religious views? If not, thanks for stopping by."
Obama should do what Raygun did with the Air Traffic Controller union. Fire them all and hire people that aren't religious fanatics, and cite Raygun as the precedent.
Snap mfer!
As noted above, a state employee choosing one religion over another is illegal.
Let's have hundreds of Muslims get state jobs in Texas and start denying marriage licenses to Christians that want to marry.
See the problem Mary?
Hardly. The fight between the cult of LGBT and Christians has just gotten off the ground. Christians are not going to exchange their immortal soul for a marriage license issuance, a cake or a bouqet of flowers. ..Big surprise.
Those Red states are filled with pig-fucking devils calling themselves "Christian".
This is gonna be one of those eras that future Christians look back on....and try to revise.
There is nothing that requires a state employee to give up his religious beliefs.Firing people for their religious beliefs is illegal, turd.Fire them, done deal. Don't want to do the job you are being paid to do? Find another.
I'm guessing there will be a question added to the job app for states now.
Question 5:
"Can you properly conduct all duties required when taking this job based on your religious views? If not, thanks for stopping by."
Obama should do what Raygun did with the Air Traffic Controller union. Fire them all and hire people that aren't religious fanatics, and cite Raygun as the precedent.
Snap mfer!
As noted above, a state employee choosing one religion over another is illegal.
Let's have hundreds of Muslims get state jobs in Texas and start denying marriage licenses to Christians that want to marry.
See the problem Mary?
There is nothing that requires a state employee to give up his religious beliefs.Firing people for their religious beliefs is illegal, turd.Fire them, done deal. Don't want to do the job you are being paid to do? Find another.
I'm guessing there will be a question added to the job app for states now.
Question 5:
"Can you properly conduct all duties required when taking this job based on your religious views? If not, thanks for stopping by."
Obama should do what Raygun did with the Air Traffic Controller union. Fire them all and hire people that aren't religious fanatics, and cite Raygun as the precedent.
Snap mfer!
As noted above, a state employee choosing one religion over another is illegal.
Let's have hundreds of Muslims get state jobs in Texas and start denying marriage licenses to Christians that want to marry.
See the problem Mary?
As usual you are misinformed.
Don't be stupid,There is nothing that requires a state employee to give up his religious beliefs.Firing people for their religious beliefs is illegal, turd.Fire them, done deal. Don't want to do the job you are being paid to do? Find another.
I'm guessing there will be a question added to the job app for states now.
Question 5:
"Can you properly conduct all duties required when taking this job based on your religious views? If not, thanks for stopping by."
Obama should do what Raygun did with the Air Traffic Controller union. Fire them all and hire people that aren't religious fanatics, and cite Raygun as the precedent.
Snap mfer!
As noted above, a state employee choosing one religion over another is illegal.
Let's have hundreds of Muslims get state jobs in Texas and start denying marriage licenses to Christians that want to marry.
See the problem Mary?
As usual you are misinformed.
So when a cop refuses to arrest someone- citing his religious beliefs- that will be fine with you?
And when a judge refuses to sentence someone to death- citing his religious beliefs- that will be fine with you?
And when a clerk refuses to issue that concealed carry permit- citing his religious beliefs- that will be fine with you?
And when the clerk refuses to issue that building permit for a Christian church- citing his religious beliefs- that will be fine with you?
County clerks currently employed had absolutely no way of knowing that their religious faith would clash with what they are now being told they have to do. So the federal government should give a full retirement severance package for [x] years those employees across the country had planned to work in that career; all wages, including expected yearly cost of living adjustments, raises...up to and including retirement, including a full medical package they were also promised for themselves and their families, in order to pacify their claims of today. Or else the Court could just uphold the 1st Amendment since what we're talking about is forcing Christians to participate in a cult's value system of deviant sex behaviors and not a static race.So when a cop refuses to arrest someone- citing his religious beliefs- that will be fine with you?
And when a judge refuses to sentence someone to death- citing his religious beliefs- that will be fine with you?