Kerry: The Internet is making it hard o govern

[kwc57]

John Kerry: 'This Little Thing Called the Internet ... Makes It Much Harder to Govern'

"Well, folks," he said, "ever since the end of the Cold War, forces have been unleashed that were tamped down for centuries by dictators, and that was complicated further by this little thing called the internet and the ability of people everywhere to communicate instantaneously and to have more information coming at them in one day than most people can process in months or a year -"

.

It's why Dear Leader prefers to dictate.

 

[francoHFW]

MSNBC is factual, but spends too much time arguing with hypocrite Pubs and their propagandists.

 

[francoHFW]

He's talking about DICTATORS, functional shytteheads... DUH. But carry on, fools.

 

[R.C. Christian]

He's talking about DICTATORS, functional shytteheads... DUH. But carry on, fools.

I bet you road the short bus didn't you?

 

[Contumacious]

He's talking about DICTATORS. The problem in this country is CNS and the rest of the Pub Propaganda Machine pouring out misinformation to the dupes. Try some real journalism sometime.

And so are we:

Daniel Ellsberg: ‘I’m sure that President Obama would have sought a life sentence in my case"

.

 

[Londoner]

This is why George Bush created the patriot act along with the largest surveillance bureaucracy in world history, the Department of Homeland Security.

Bush wanted the tools to conduct comprehensive surveillance on the American people. He wanted the tools to collect data on every American citizen. He exploited people's fear over 9/11 to build a massive surveillance apparatus. This is exactly what happened in the old Soviet Union, where they propagandized national security threats to build greater surveillance over their own people. Any time a government uses national security to justify surveillance, they are merely trying to protect themselves from the political opposition and their own people.

Please recall Eliot Spitzer's scathing critiques of the Bush administration for its role in the housing and Wall Street meltdowns. In response to Eliot Spitzer's political attacks, the Bush Fed used the patriot act to set up surveillance over Spitzer's life - and once he moved more than $10,000, they had him. This is pure Soviet Union. First you use national security to beef up surveillance, then you use that surveillance to hunt political enemies.

And guess what? The Republican Party is going to be back in power in 2016. You ain't seen nothing yet. The Republicans are going to bring back the war on terrorism, only this time it will be on steroids. You ain't seen nothing yet. The patriot act is going to seem like Club Med compared to what the Republicans are going to do once they get their next attack.

 

[kwc57]

He's talking about DICTATORS, functional shytteheads... DUH. But carry on, fools.

I bet you road the short bus didn't you?

He's not allowed. He kept licking the windows.

 

[The Rabbi]

This is why George Bush created the patriot act along with the largest surveillance bureaucracy in world history, the Department of Homeland Security.

Bush wanted the tools to conduct comprehensive surveillance on the American people. He wanted the tools to collect data on every American citizen. He exploited people's fear over 9/11 to build a massive surveillance apparatus. This is exactly what happened in the old Soviet Union, where they propagandized national security threats to build greater surveillance over their own people. Any time a government uses national security to justify surveillance, they are merely trying to protect themselves from the political opposition and their own people.

Please recall Eliot Spitzer's scathing critiques of the Bush administration for its role in the housing and Wall Street meltdowns. In response to Eliot Spitzer's political attacks, the Bush Fed used the patriot act to set up surveillance over Spitzer's life - and once he moved more than $10,000, they had him. This is pure Soviet Union. First you use national security to beef up surveillance, then you use that surveillance to hunt political enemies.

And guess what? The Republican Party is going to be back in power in 2016. You ain't seen nothing yet. The Republicans are going to bring back the war on terrorism, only this time it will be on steroids. You ain't seen nothing yet. The patriot act is going to seem like Club Med compared to what the Republicans are going to do once they get their next attack.

Bush has been out of office for 5 years, dunce.

 

[The T]

John Kerry: 'This Little Thing Called the Internet ... Makes It Much Harder to Govern'

"Well, folks," he said, "ever since the end of the Cold War, forces have been unleashed that were tamped down for centuries by dictators, and that was complicated further by this little thing called the internet and the ability of people everywhere to communicate instantaneously and to have more information coming at them in one day than most people can process in months or a year -"

.

Translation? "Shit! They're awake and onto us..."

 

[freedombecki]

John Kerry: 'This Little Thing Called the Internet ... Makes It Much Harder to Govern'

"Well, folks," he said, "ever since the end of the Cold War, forces have been unleashed that were tamped down for centuries by dictators, and that was complicated further by this little thing called the internet and the ability of people everywhere to communicate instantaneously and to have more information coming at them in one day than most people can process in months or a year -"

.

Bulloney! He's just getting back what Teresa Heinz Kerry's taxfree foundations funding criminal perfidies against President Bush perpetrated.

 

[freedombecki]

This is why George Bush created the patriot act along with the largest surveillance bureaucracy in world history, the Department of Homeland Security.

Bush wanted the tools to conduct comprehensive surveillance on the American people. He wanted the tools to collect data on every American citizen. He exploited people's fear over 9/11 to build a massive surveillance apparatus. This is exactly what happened in the old Soviet Union, where they propagandized national security threats to build greater surveillance over their own people. Any time a government uses national security to justify surveillance, they are merely trying to protect themselves from the political opposition and their own people.

Please recall Eliot Spitzer's scathing critiques of the Bush administration for its role in the housing and Wall Street meltdowns. In response to Eliot Spitzer's political attacks, the Bush Fed used the patriot act to set up surveillance over Spitzer's life - and once he moved more than $10,000, they had him. This is pure Soviet Union. First you use national security to beef up surveillance, then you use that surveillance to hunt political enemies.

And guess what? The Republican Party is going to be back in power in 2016. You ain't seen nothing yet. The Republicans are going to bring back the war on terrorism, only this time it will be on steroids. You ain't seen nothing yet. The patriot act is going to seem like Club Med compared to what the Republicans are going to do once they get their next attack.

That's PRESIDENT Bush to you.

 

[Contumacious]

John Kerry: 'This Little Thing Called the Internet ... Makes It Much Harder to Govern'

"Well, folks," he said, "ever since the end of the Cold War, forces have been unleashed that were tamped down for centuries by dictators, and that was complicated further by this little thing called the internet and the ability of people everywhere to communicate instantaneously and to have more information coming at them in one day than most people can process in months or a year -"

.

Translation? "Shit! They're awake and onto us..."

That is correct.

.

 

[dilloduck]

Bush--Obama--Clinton

All front men. think about it people. They can't pull this shit off by themselves.

And AGAIN I ask---WHERE IS THE VOICE OF THE OPPOSITION ?

It's gone. That sure make us worry.

 

[FA_Q2]

This is why George Bush created the patriot act along with the largest surveillance bureaucracy in world history, the Department of Homeland Security.

Bush wanted the tools to conduct comprehensive surveillance on the American people. He wanted the tools to collect data on every American citizen. He exploited people's fear over 9/11 to build a massive surveillance apparatus. This is exactly what happened in the old Soviet Union, where they propagandized national security threats to build greater surveillance over their own people. Any time a government uses national security to justify surveillance, they are merely trying to protect themselves from the political opposition and their own people.

Please recall Eliot Spitzer's scathing critiques of the Bush administration for its role in the housing and Wall Street meltdowns. In response to Eliot Spitzer's political attacks, the Bush Fed used the patriot act to set up surveillance over Spitzer's life - and once he moved more than $10,000, they had him. This is pure Soviet Union. First you use national security to beef up surveillance, then you use that surveillance to hunt political enemies.

And guess what? The Republican Party is going to be back in power in 2016. You ain't seen nothing yet. The Republicans are going to bring back the war on terrorism, only this time it will be on steroids. You ain't seen nothing yet. The patriot act is going to seem like Club Med compared to what the Republicans are going to do once they get their next attack.

Bush has been out of office for 5 years, dunce.

But he was right. Under Bush we hadn’t seen nothing yet. When Obama took over, the dems passed the PA again and created the new NSA master facility, drone programs and the most comprehensive surveillance system that the world has seen. Enough to make the Bush programs envious of their success.

Oh wait, he thought that we would have to have a republican in 2016 for all that to happen. Guess he was WAY off there.

 

[Immanuel]

This is why George Bush created the patriot act along with the largest surveillance bureaucracy in world history, the Department of Homeland Security.

Bush wanted the tools to conduct comprehensive surveillance on the American people. He wanted the tools to collect data on every American citizen. He exploited people's fear over 9/11 to build a massive surveillance apparatus. This is exactly what happened in the old Soviet Union, where they propagandized national security threats to build greater surveillance over their own people. Any time a government uses national security to justify surveillance, they are merely trying to protect themselves from the political opposition and their own people.

Please recall Eliot Spitzer's scathing critiques of the Bush administration for its role in the housing and Wall Street meltdowns. In response to Eliot Spitzer's political attacks, the Bush Fed used the patriot act to set up surveillance over Spitzer's life - and once he moved more than $10,000, they had him. This is pure Soviet Union. First you use national security to beef up surveillance, then you use that surveillance to hunt political enemies.

And guess what? The Republican Party is going to be back in power in 2016. You ain't seen nothing yet. The Republicans are going to bring back the war on terrorism, only this time it will be on steroids. You ain't seen nothing yet. The patriot act is going to seem like Club Med compared to what the Republicans are going to do once they get their next attack.

Bush has been out of office for 5 years, dunce.

But he was right. Under Bush we hadn’t seen nothing yet. When Obama took over, the dems passed the PA again and created the new NSA master facility, drone programs and the most comprehensive surveillance system that the world has seen. Enough to make the Bush programs envious of their success.

Oh wait, he thought that we would have to have a republican in 2016 for all that to happen. Guess he was WAY off there.

Ah, but remember, Obama promised us the most transparent administration the country has ever seen. We have nothing to fear! Okay, then tell me why, I no longer trust my own government to do the right things?

Immie

 

[theDoctorisIn]

In a sense, he has a strong point.

Too much information (particularly when a lot of it is wrong) does make it make it harder to govern - or function at all, when it comes down to it.

Has anyone ever heard the expression "A man with a watch knows what time it is, a man with two watches is never sure."?

 

[Rozman]

Last thing politicians want is an informed populace...

 

[The T]

In a sense, he has a strong point.

Too much information (particularly when a lot of it is wrong) does make it make it harder to govern - or function at all, when it comes down to it.

Has anyone ever heard the expression "A man with a watch knows what time it is, a man with two watches is never sure."?

NO...He is PISSED that the governed are questioning the governors...and refusing to let them get away with stealing our liberties.

It can't be anything else. It is people as YOU that by your dismissiveness, parsing spewed crap by Statists in power, why we are where we are.

LEARN IT, Live it, KNOW it...and above all else?

WAKE UP. It affects YOU too...(unless YOU are one of the Statists...and I think the latter if your posts on these boards are any guide....PROVE me wrong).

 

[Robodoon]

To say in Human Speech, the free communications to the public are making it harder for the evil overlords to do their evil will on the masses.

But Porn has to be removed from the internet, it is not speech, it is animal.

And human beings aren't just animals, we are make in the Image of GOD! WE ARE MORE, but if we don't act like it...BLAH BLAH BLAH

We have responsibility over flesh,,,, after all that was what the Garden of Eden was about...we picked Animal, well at least Eve did, but Adam backed down.

DARN YOU WOMAN! LOL!

 

[theDoctorisIn]

Last thing politicians want is an informed populace...

True. But I think in the end, misinformation is a bigger problem.