Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
I don't have to pretend at all. In my many years here I can't recall a single person or postOh you can pretend that the Neo-Bunch isn't enamored with Trump's buddy.
We have a host of people defending Putin and attacking Ukraine. Crusader Frank admitted he supports Putin.I don't have to pretend at all. In my many years here I can't recall a single person or post
where Putin was admired, endorsed or thought of fondly.
Enamored? Nothing I could say about you would be half as dismissive as what you say about the "neo bunch" (whatever that is) or yourself.
You are a one of a kind idiot.
I don't claim to monitor every post ever made but my statement stands and the exception, if there is one,We have a host of people defending Putin and attacking Ukraine. Crusader Frank admitted he supports Putin.
So you imagine the right using the politicized bankrupt definition of treason used by Claire McCasskill and then condemn them for it, making a very neat circle of illogic, partisanship and fanaticism.Can you imagine if the shoe was on the other foot and it was a democrat who was praising and defending Putin while a republican was president? The right wing snowflake tantrums would be through the roof. It’s amazing how childish of hypocrites Trump supporters are.
There is an 'or' and not an 'and' in there.....There cannot be 'Treason' unless a state of war were declared by Congress.
This is why Jane Fonda could not be charged with treason during the 'Vietnam war'.
The U.S. Constitution defines treason as:
"levying War against [the United States], or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort"
If there was a state of war, then Tucker could be charged with treason.
Oh, please do tell…then maybe you could explain to us how free speech equals treason?
No, he could not.
Political dissent, no matter how distasteful to you is not 'treason.'
Are you just peeved that Tucker Carlson and other Fox programs have made an unprecedented sweepIf you can't read what the Constitution defines as treason don't expect me to explain it to you. At this point the former senator can say what every she thinks about what the Pin Head Tucker had to say. Neither one are committing treason according to our Constitution.
Without a declaration of war, there is no clear definition of who is an "Enemy".There is an 'or' and not an 'and' in there.....
Doesn't say you have to be at war with aid and comfort, just that you're aiding is aiding our enemies....? Perhaps?????
Just as your disappointing comments give other dim witted people aid and comfort.Political dissent is one thing, but Tucker "gives them Aid and Comfort".
A well thought out and true comment.Without a declaration of war, there is no clear definition of who is an "Enemy".
Are you just peeved that Tucker Carlson and other Fox programs have made an unprecedented sweep
when year ending ratings were assessed? Top Cable News Shows of 2021: Tucker Carlson Tonight Is No. 1 in All Measurements For First Time Ever
McCaskill isn't committing treason with her vacuous comments. She's just revealing to all what a dope she is.
McCaskill meet McAsshole.Tucker is a Russian asset. Bout as close to being a traitor as you can get.
20 years ago, his career would have been over. No spine...or credibility left on the right hand side of the aisle.
Tell it to TV Newser, whatever that is.You're just pissing into the wind.
Hosted opinion shows are not news.
No, it does not.Political dissent is one thing, but Tucker "gives them Aid and Comfort".
Let me get this straight: you believe Americans aren't allowed to dissent against prog scumbags?No, it does not.
Period.
The idiocy here is monumental.
I never said they were, the Senator did, and you agreed…so show me.If you can't read what the Constitution defines as treason don't expect me to explain it to you. At this point the former senator can say what every she thinks about what the Pin Head Tucker had to say. Neither one are committing treason according to our Constitution.
Not all states need to decertify.All 50 states had certified their elections and neither chamber voted to uphold the disingenuous objections the Neo-GOP members of Congress raised.
Then why does CNN always call her to do interviews?She has no power and her opinion means nothing.
