AvgGuyIA
Gold Member
Yes.I'll ask yet ONCE AGAIN.......
Would right wingers be defending Davis if she refused to issue marriage licenses to gay couples were she to do so because of her Muslim faith?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes.I'll ask yet ONCE AGAIN.......
Would right wingers be defending Davis if she refused to issue marriage licenses to gay couples were she to do so because of her Muslim faith?
Then what did you mean when you said - Davis' brand of evangelical Christianity is younger than she is.
Davis' evangelical offshoot did not exist until the 1960s......Probably a brand of Christianity that better tolerates her 3 divorces and 4 marriages.
What offshoot?
None of Christianity has tolerated divorce. That is the left who is for divorce and single mothers.
She is forgiven by God when she accepted Jesus as her savior 4 1/2 years ago. Sorry if some here don't understand that he died for our sins.
Jesus told the adulter you are forgiven go and sin no more.
America has had sodomy laws from the beginning of the nation until 2003 when the activist courts got rid of all of them.
And even if she was an atheist.Yes.I'll ask yet ONCE AGAIN.......
Would right wingers be defending Davis if she refused to issue marriage licenses to gay couples were she to do so because of her Muslim faith?
No, she's not being impeached because everybody knows that the voters won't vote her out of office.Do you know why she isn't being impeached?
Because her CONSTITUENTS, who placed her in that office, AGREE WITH HER. The people who elected her believe she is doing the right thing.
NO, idiot, she is not currently being impeached because that would require the KY state legislature to be called into session....which will not happen until next January.
Did Davis campaign on NOT issuing marriage licenses to gays???
Yes or no? imbecile.
America has had sodomy laws from the beginning of the nation until 2003 when the activist courts got rid of all of them.
Oh, I see, you seem to have no problems with gays (as Jesus didn't seem to have a problem with them) UNTIL they decide to have sex.....then its sodomy that offends your sick mind, correct?
He asked if any had condemned her after he chastised them...she said no one had condemned her, and he said "Neither do I condemn thee" .Then what did you mean when you said - Davis' brand of evangelical Christianity is younger than she is.
Davis' evangelical offshoot did not exist until the 1960s......Probably a brand of Christianity that better tolerates her 3 divorces and 4 marriages.
What offshoot?
None of Christianity has tolerated divorce. That is the left who is for divorce and single mothers.
She is forgiven by God when she accepted Jesus as her savior 4 1/2 years ago. Sorry if some here don't understand that he died for our sins.
Jesus told the adulter you are forgiven go and sin no more.
America has had sodomy laws from the beginning of the nation until 2003 when the activist courts got rid of all of them.
Actually Jesus said--------in sum and substance-----"don't kill her" I do not recall
the "I forgive you" part---------the "sin no more" ----that part I do remember -------
of course I did not memorize the book chapter and verse------but the parable is very
consistent with the times
America has had sodomy laws from the beginning of the nation until 2003 when the activist courts got rid of all of them.
Oh, I see, you seem to have no problems with gays (as Jesus didn't seem to have a problem with them) UNTIL they decide to have sex.....then its sodomy that offends your sick mind, correct?
Do you really think that is even remotely akin to this?Well, since all the closeted racists and bigots among the right wingers on this thread "swear" that they would defend Davis' [in]actions were she a Muslim, a Jew, an atheist.......I would conclude that these same folks will openly castigate all their fellow right wingers who claim that Obama is a Muslim....correct?
No, she's not being impeached because everybody knows that the voters won't vote her out of office.
They are depraved. But not as depraved as the animals who want to throw people in jail for failing to endorse their depravity.It's not even that. It's that the state does not have the right to force people to act in a depraved manner, against all their closely held personal convictions. The state can PREVENT people from acting in a depraved manner, but it has no authority to force people TO be depraved. And it doesn't ... or shouldn't....have the authority to punish them if they refuse.
You are the worst kind of BIGOT........to call gays "depraved" shows what a scum bucket your soul consists of. If you want to define "depravity" find a mirror.
Oh yes he did have a problem with them.
Romans Chapter 1
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in [their] knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
No, it comes from reading. If you did a little more reading and a little less hyperventilating, you might have titillating factoids at your fingertips as well.No, she's not being impeached because everybody knows that the voters won't vote her out of office.
Yet ANOTHER extensive survey conducted by koshermoron, of the people in Davis' county.....Amazing how quickly and effectively you implement these surveys.
[
No. Go search my posts on the Muslim cab drivers who tried to claim they should be able to refuse fares carrying alcohol.
You fucking retard, Romans isn't OT.Oh yes he did have a problem with them.
Romans Chapter 1
24 Wherefore God also gave them up to uncleanness through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonour their own bodies between themselves:
25 Who changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
28 And even as they did not like to retain God in [their] knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;
Did Jesus "write" the Old Testament???? You often learn so much from right wingers on here.
Well, since all the closeted racists and bigots among the right wingers on this thread "swear" that they would defend Davis' [in]actions were she a Muslim, a Jew, an atheist.......I would conclude that these same folks will openly castigate all their fellow right wingers who claim that Obama is a Muslim....correct?
They are depraved. But not as depraved as the animals who want to throw people in jail for failing to endorse their depravity.
There's nothing bigoted about it. You can be as queer as you like and I don't give two shits. But you can't force me to approve of it or sanction it. It won't happen. Now go finish your hysterics, swish.
Please. Read.They are depraved. But not as depraved as the animals who want to throw people in jail for failing to endorse their depravity.
There's nothing bigoted about it. You can be as queer as you like and I don't give two shits. But you can't force me to approve of it or sanction it. It won't happen. Now go finish your hysterics, swish.
Now the above is an accurate synopses of a "good Christian," don't you think?
Well, moron, in Brown v. Board of Ed, the SCOTUS ALSO told states that federal law supersedes the slavery mentality of bigots (like you.)
[
No. Go search my posts on the Muslim cab drivers who tried to claim they should be able to refuse fares carrying alcohol.
What about them?
First off, I already stated that if they own their own cab they have every right to refuse fares that have alcohol. I believe you ran and hid about that point.
Secondly, what does that have to do with shortbus and criticisms of Islam?