Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 52,660
- 15,666
- 2,180
Calling your personal ...
Your Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.
Laughing.......your tell already. That was easy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Calling your personal ...
Your Concession is Duly Noted and Summarily Accepted.
She had that office before the Supremes legislated from the bench...
She was giving a New law that went against her Faith...
Kim Davis didn't choose to license degeneracy. Kim Davis' state didn't license degeneracy.False equivalency.I'll go along with that as soon as 'sanctuary cities', business's and others go to jail for violating immigration law.
Wait. Listen to what is being said. Kim Davis is picking and choosing. If ever there was a gift horse then this is it and it would end a hell of a lot of division. Unless there is some reason that we have to be divided.
False equivalency.I'll go along with that as soon as 'sanctuary cities', business's and others go to jail for violating immigration law.
Wait. Listen to what is being said. Kim Davis is picking and choosing. If ever there was a gift horse then this is it and it would end a hell of a lot of division. Unless there is some reason that we have to be divided.
False equivalency.I'll go along with that as soon as 'sanctuary cities', business's and others go to jail for violating immigration law.
Wait. Listen to what is being said. Kim Davis is picking and choosing. If ever there was a gift horse then this is it and it would end a hell of a lot of division. Unless there is some reason that we have to be divided.
There's no equivalent to prosecutorial discretion with a Clerk's office. A clerk doesn't have the authority to deny any eligible person any state service. And she doesn't set the standards of eligibility. The law does.
False equivalency.I'll go along with that as soon as 'sanctuary cities', business's and others go to jail for violating immigration law.
Wait. Listen to what is being said. Kim Davis is picking and choosing. If ever there was a gift horse then this is it and it would end a hell of a lot of division. Unless there is some reason that we have to be divided.
There's no equivalent to prosecutorial discretion with a Clerk's office. A clerk doesn't have the authority to deny any eligible person any state service. And she doesn't set the standards of eligibility. The law does.
You aren't listening.
False equivalency.I'll go along with that as soon as 'sanctuary cities', business's and others go to jail for violating immigration law.
Wait. Listen to what is being said. Kim Davis is picking and choosing. If ever there was a gift horse then this is it and it would end a hell of a lot of division. Unless there is some reason that we have to be divided.
There's no equivalent to prosecutorial discretion with a Clerk's office. A clerk doesn't have the authority to deny any eligible person any state service. And she doesn't set the standards of eligibility. The law does.
You aren't listening.
I'm all ears. What am I missing? For example....a gift horse that does what?
False equivalency.
Wait. Listen to what is being said. Kim Davis is picking and choosing. If ever there was a gift horse then this is it and it would end a hell of a lot of division. Unless there is some reason that we have to be divided.
There's no equivalent to prosecutorial discretion with a Clerk's office. A clerk doesn't have the authority to deny any eligible person any state service. And she doesn't set the standards of eligibility. The law does.
You aren't listening.
I'm all ears. What am I missing? For example....a gift horse that does what?
I'm aware of what law does. I am very aware of what court orders are and what the Clerk's office is.
Plenty of Republicans have said Kim Davis has to go and she cannot have that position. Plenty of people on the right have acknowledged the same. You have a few that are die hard don't get it--don't want to get it and feel a need to be persecuted. You have just as many that are hearing this as a picking and choosing what rights are and who gets them and what laws are followed. Do you understand?
Wait. Listen to what is being said. Kim Davis is picking and choosing. If ever there was a gift horse then this is it and it would end a hell of a lot of division. Unless there is some reason that we have to be divided.
There's no equivalent to prosecutorial discretion with a Clerk's office. A clerk doesn't have the authority to deny any eligible person any state service. And she doesn't set the standards of eligibility. The law does.
You aren't listening.
I'm all ears. What am I missing? For example....a gift horse that does what?
I'm aware of what law does. I am very aware of what court orders are and what the Clerk's office is.
Plenty of Republicans have said Kim Davis has to go and she cannot have that position. Plenty of people on the right have acknowledged the same. You have a few that are die hard don't get it--don't want to get it and feel a need to be persecuted. You have just as many that are hearing this as a picking and choosing what rights are and who gets them and what laws are followed. Do you understand?
So far, yup. What is your point?
Still trying to convince yourself, I see.Kim Davis didn't choose to license degeneracy. Kim Davis' state didn't license degeneracy.False equivalency.I'll go along with that as soon as 'sanctuary cities', business's and others go to jail for violating immigration law.
Wait. Listen to what is being said. Kim Davis is picking and choosing. If ever there was a gift horse then this is it and it would end a hell of a lot of division. Unless there is some reason that we have to be divided.
And the laws in her state recognize the only definition of marriage possible, where the culture recognizes the human physiological standard which defines marriage as: The joining of one man and one woman.
I agree with them breaking the law. Now...why isn't someone doing something about it? Filing a lawsuit or something? That's what they had to do in Kim Davis' case.....DO SOMETHING.There's no equivalent to prosecutorial discretion with a Clerk's office. A clerk doesn't have the authority to deny any eligible person any state service. And she doesn't set the standards of eligibility. The law does.
You aren't listening.
I'm all ears. What am I missing? For example....a gift horse that does what?
I'm aware of what law does. I am very aware of what court orders are and what the Clerk's office is.
Plenty of Republicans have said Kim Davis has to go and she cannot have that position. Plenty of people on the right have acknowledged the same. You have a few that are die hard don't get it--don't want to get it and feel a need to be persecuted. You have just as many that are hearing this as a picking and choosing what rights are and who gets them and what laws are followed. Do you understand?
So far, yup. What is your point?
Sanctuary policies and ordinances contradict federal law. Illegal immigrants are breaking the law. Cities, specifically Sanctuary cities, break the law.
Now, you know why some of the Republican candidates have been very, very candid about being a nation of laws.
I tried that others have broken the law and it doesn't seem to have much impact. It's a form of "Mikey did it too."There's no equivalent to prosecutorial discretion with a Clerk's office. A clerk doesn't have the authority to deny any eligible person any state service. And she doesn't set the standards of eligibility. The law does.
You aren't listening.
I'm all ears. What am I missing? For example....a gift horse that does what?
I'm aware of what law does. I am very aware of what court orders are and what the Clerk's office is.
Plenty of Republicans have said Kim Davis has to go and she cannot have that position. Plenty of people on the right have acknowledged the same. You have a few that are die hard don't get it--don't want to get it and feel a need to be persecuted. You have just as many that are hearing this as a picking and choosing what rights are and who gets them and what laws are followed. Do you understand?
So far, yup. What is your point?
Sanctuary policies and ordinances contradict federal law. Illegal immigrants are breaking the law. Cities, specifically Sanctuary cities, break the law.
Now, you know why some of the Republican candidates have been very, very candid about being a nation of laws.
I agree with them breaking the law. Now...why isn't someone doing something about it? Filing a lawsuit or something? That's what they had to do in Kim Davis' case.....DO SOMETHING.You aren't listening.
I'm all ears. What am I missing? For example....a gift horse that does what?
I'm aware of what law does. I am very aware of what court orders are and what the Clerk's office is.
Plenty of Republicans have said Kim Davis has to go and she cannot have that position. Plenty of people on the right have acknowledged the same. You have a few that are die hard don't get it--don't want to get it and feel a need to be persecuted. You have just as many that are hearing this as a picking and choosing what rights are and who gets them and what laws are followed. Do you understand?
So far, yup. What is your point?
Sanctuary policies and ordinances contradict federal law. Illegal immigrants are breaking the law. Cities, specifically Sanctuary cities, break the law.
Now, you know why some of the Republican candidates have been very, very candid about being a nation of laws.
Based on what you're saying, it sounds like if anything, there is an administrative issue under Kentucky law. But I don't see it amounting to violating the Federal court order.
I tried that others have broken the law and it doesn't seem to have much impact. It's a form of "Mikey did it too."You aren't listening.
I'm all ears. What am I missing? For example....a gift horse that does what?
I'm aware of what law does. I am very aware of what court orders are and what the Clerk's office is.
Plenty of Republicans have said Kim Davis has to go and she cannot have that position. Plenty of people on the right have acknowledged the same. You have a few that are die hard don't get it--don't want to get it and feel a need to be persecuted. You have just as many that are hearing this as a picking and choosing what rights are and who gets them and what laws are followed. Do you understand?
So far, yup. What is your point?
Sanctuary policies and ordinances contradict federal law. Illegal immigrants are breaking the law. Cities, specifically Sanctuary cities, break the law.
Now, you know why some of the Republican candidates have been very, very candid about being a nation of laws.
It's been a couple of weeks since she got sprung...any homos refused a license there? It's old news and beaten to death
As long as she stays out of the way no one should give a damn, and I don't.It's been a couple of weeks since she got sprung...any homos refused a license there? It's old news and beaten to death