🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Kim Davis needs to go to jail

Kim Davis is an elected politician, so she can't be fired by anyone.

So go ahead and scream all you want, it won't do any good.
 
Thank you. She sure does not act like a Democrat.

Yeah... She's a Christian, therefore not a Leftist. My guess is that she votes for Americans and likely maintains party affiliation with the Democrat Party out of family heritage. At one time in U.S. History Democrats were affiliated with American Principle.
That's what I've saying for years.
These backwards hicks vote Democrat no matter what....but Obama is giving them too many reasons to break with tradition.

more lunacy from muddy.

the "hicks" dear are the rightwingnut bigoted trash.

want to try again?
Don't need to, because the facts are on my side, once again.

You on the left live in an imaginary world. The real world keeps rearing it's ugly head....and that causes you distress.

Many of these inbred mouth breathers are Democrats, purhaps most of them. They go to work every day, chew tobacco, drive their trucks, go hunting and fishing, get drunk Friday night, suffer thru a hangover on Saturday, attend church on Sunday, and vote Democrat every 4 years.....sometimes 2 years. You on the left alienate them 24/7 and then trash conservatives day and night in hopes they'll either continue to vote Democrat, or stay home. Why do you think every Democrat claims to be Catholic, Mormon, or Christian during election cycles?

Harry Reid - Mormon
Nancy Pelosi - Catholic
Joe Biden - Catholic
Barrack Obama - Christian

Once they feel fooling these imbeciles that live in trailers is impossible, they'll probably drop the facade. Maybe bringing in in millions of refugees will change all of that. At the DNC they voted to remove God. Leadership knew this was political suicide, so they were overruled.
The people on these boards defending her are certainly not Democrats.
True.

And those defending Davis are exhibiting their ignorance of, or contempt for, the Constitution, its case law, and the rule of law.
 
Kim Davis is an elected politician, so she can't be fired by anyone.

So go ahead and scream all you want, it won't do any good.
She can be held in contempt, however, as she was before; at which time she'll need to make a choice: obey the Constitution as she swore to do as an elected official, or return to jail.

And should Davis return to jail it will be of her own free will, where she'll have only herself to blame.
 
the issue of marriage equality has already been litigated. now it has to be enforced against people who violate the law like the winger in kentucky

But, can you explain why the new forms are not valid or constitute defiance of the court order?
 
the issue of marriage equality has already been litigated. now it has to be enforced against people who violate the law like the winger in kentucky

But, can you explain why the new forms are not valid or constitute defiance of the court order?
That's explained in the OP article:

'She "confiscated all the original forms, and provided a changed form" that didn't mention Rowan County, the filing said. Nor did the new form mention her name or references to a "deputy clerk."'

The court order releasing her from jail clearly admonishes Davis to not interfere “in any way, directly or indirectly” with the issuing of marriage licenses.

Obviously confiscating original forms, removing the name of the county from the forms, and deleting references to a 'deputy clerk' manifest interfering directly with the issuing of marriage licenses, in violation of the court order releasing her from jail.

The issue has nothing to do with whether the forms are 'valid' or not, the issue is whether Davis violated the court order releasing her from jail, which she clearly has; and as such Davis needs to stop interfering with the process or decide to return to jail, since she is again in contempt of court.

Link to the court order releasing Davis from jail, and the conditions of her release:

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/09/08/us/kim-davis-contempt-order-lifted.html
 
Kim Davis is an elected politician, so she can't be fired by anyone.

So go ahead and scream all you want, it won't do any good.

Just like people will say that Muslims shouldn't be President because their views are incompatible with the Constitution, but no one says Davis shouldn't be elected to her job even though her views (and those of people like Huckabee) are incompatible with the Constitution.
 
Let Kim Davis keep her job, just without pay until she does her job....she will not sacrifice for Jesus ...she expects gays to sacrifice their constitutional Rights at the altar of her God...
 
Obviously confiscating original forms, removing the name of the county from the forms, and deleting references to a 'deputy clerk' manifest interfering directly with the issuing of marriage licenses, in violation of the court order releasing her from jail.

No, that isn't obvious at all. Just because she's using a new form does not mean that she's interfering with anything. It's just a new form. As long as the forms remain valid and effective instruments, then a redesign is nothing more than a cosmetic change. And bitching about the new forms is insanely petty.
 
[ And bitching about the new forms is insanely petty.

She does not have the authority to one own volition change Government forms...that is number one..

Number two changing the form is a terrible petty tantrum by this two bit phony


She says she won't resign because "she will lose her voice" well lady get a voice on your won dime the tax payers do not have to pay so you "have a voice"..
 
leftist elected officials don't follow the actual law, and people have been raped and murdered b/c of it.

but 4 people not being allowed to marry? Well that's just evul.


It's times like these I wish I had faith that there was a hell, it would hearten me to know where filth like you end up
 
No, that isn't obvious at all. Just because she's using a new form does not mean that she's interfering with anything. It's just a new form. As long as the forms remain valid and effective instruments, then a redesign is nothing more than a cosmetic change. And bitching about the new forms is insanely petty.

Kentucky law requires that she use the forms from the Department of Libraries and Archives which specifies what information will be on the form and who can sign it in their official capacity.

Ms. Davis changed that form upon returning to work, which is the claim (a) she modified the form which Kentucky law does not allow, and (b) she interfered with the process in violation of the Federal District Court order.


>>>>
 
... those defending Davis are exhibiting their ignorance of, or contempt for, the Constitution, its case law, and the rule of law.

ROFLMNAO!

Hysterical... they reject THE LAW, abuse the judiciary to OVERTURN THE LAW through illicit means, converting a judicial court to a 9 member legislature and then demand to stand upon THE RULE OF LAW.

Here's the problem with that: The Law is only viable where THE LAW is objective. Where the Judiciary turns the law subjective, the law loses the objectivity that the consent to be governed was based upon and the consent is withdrawn, because the law no longer serves them.

And that is what throughout human history, once the law becomes subjective the culture THE LAW SERVED: dissolves into bloody civil war.
 
No, that isn't obvious at all. Just because she's using a new form does not mean that she's interfering with anything. It's just a new form. As long as the forms remain valid and effective instruments, then a redesign is nothing more than a cosmetic change. And bitching about the new forms is insanely petty.

Kentucky law requires that she use the forms from the Department of Libraries and Archives which specifies what information will be on the form and who can sign it in their official capacity.

Ms. Davis changed that form upon returning to work, which is the claim (a) she modified the form which Kentucky law does not allow, and (b) she interfered with the process in violation of the Federal District Court order.


>>>>

The Federal Court abandoned THE LAW... therefore those whose consent to be governed rests upon the law, are no longer bound to their former consent.
 
I am sure that she signed a moral and ethics paper when she took office which states if she had a conflict of interest she was to step down.

It was like she was waiting for a gay couple to come in, which would eventually.

All of the attention that she got will bring out other :cuckoo: who want that 10 minutes of fame .

Cracked me up how Huckabee tried to use it for his campaign is now back in the shadows.








~

She had that office before the Supremes legislated from the bench....

Changing the rules in the middle of the game...

She was giving a New law that went against her Faith...

You all want a morales less society , where no cops exists you want anarchy and mayhem

This will bite you in the ass...
 
No, that isn't obvious at all. Just because she's using a new form does not mean that she's interfering with anything. It's just a new form. As long as the forms remain valid and effective instruments, then a redesign is nothing more than a cosmetic change. And bitching about the new forms is insanely petty.

Kentucky law requires that she use the forms from the Department of Libraries and Archives which specifies what information will be on the form and who can sign it in their official capacity.

Ms. Davis changed that form upon returning to work, which is the claim (a) she modified the form which Kentucky law does not allow, and (b) she interfered with the process in violation of the Federal District Court order.


>>>>

Based on what you're saying, it sounds like if anything, there is an administrative issue under Kentucky law. But I don't see it amounting to violating the Federal court order.
 

Forum List

Back
Top