Porter Rockwell
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2018
- 6,088
- 665
- 140
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #41
--------------------------- [chuckle] . hey Porter .-------------------------------- yep , mine also [aw haw , chuckle] !!My friends quote you all the time.Maybe you’re right.Your avatar fits you.
In 2003 when the wallist religion was being developed, some Salvadorans tried to effect an improper entry by trespassing over private land. The Salvadorans were intercepted by a border patrol group called Ranch Rescue. In the altercation the Salvadorans lost, but in court the Salvadorans won. The border patrol guys went to prison; the landowner lost his ranch.
Leiva v. Ranch Rescue
I would rate your criticism half right. For if we say that those foreigners were not trespassers, they were legally right in being able to sue the property owner and having the court uphold the foreigners "civil rights."
You're right on that count, except had the members of Ranch Rescue listened to me, I would have appealed that decision and argued heavily in favor of a property owner to be able to defend their property against trespassers. I do concede to your point.
The flip side to Indeependent's argument is that the United States Supreme Court ruled that it is not a crime for an undocumented foreigner to remain in the United States. Put into the correct analogy, if you make an improper U Turn and the cops don't see you do it, then you're not an "illegal driver." Don't blame me. I didn't write the freaking laws. Neither do I agree with the stances you take once we look at where its logical conclusion goes.
Every immigration attorney should simply go into another profession.
After all, not one of them has your knowledge base.
I can say this:
Many of them contact me in order to get a feel for what will and will not float in immigration cases.
Trolling me will be your downfall. I'm presuming that you're either senile or a complete idiot. If you can't answer my questions, this will be a short conversation. Discussion is a two way street. See posts # 5 and # 17. Where do YOU stand?