Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ryan's proposal is not a serious budget and Krugman is not a serious economist.
that the guy is basically a huckster looking for a job from wall street after he's bilked the taxpayer for his own salary the last 14+ years and tried to stick it to the middle class w/ his budgets for the rich guys.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/15/opinion/krugman-after-the-flimflam.html?hp&_r=3&
Way back in 2010, when everybody in Washington seemed determined to anoint Representative Paul Ryan as the ultimate Serious, Honest Conservative, I pronounced him a flimflam man. Even then, his proposals were obviously fraudulent: huge cuts in aid to the poor, but even bigger tax cuts for the rich, with all the assertions of fiscal responsibility resting on claims that he would raise trillions of dollars by closing tax loopholes (which he refused to specify) and cutting discretionary spending (in ways he refused to specify).
he then goes on to dissect Ryan's (R) latest *cough* "budget" that he and his water carrying staff for wall street have concocted.
I hear Paul Ryan has emotional problems and when he gets tired or anxious he starts mumbling "Who is John Gault"
will Ryan (R) cash-in on being a life-long, Washington-insider after he retires or gets defeated? I'm guessing yes. He'll pull a "DeMint"
will Ryan (R) cash-in on being a life-long, Washington-insider after he retires or gets defeated? I'm guessing yes. He'll pull a "DeMint"
will Obama? what's your guess on that?
will Ryan (R) cash-in on being a life-long, Washington-insider after he retires or gets defeated? I'm guessing yes. He'll pull a "DeMint"
will Obama? what's your guess on that?
Obama already has!! He wrote two books (on which he's making millions) for the sheeple before he actually did anything to write about.
and the killer is he didn't even write them and has yet to own up!!will Obama? what's your guess on that?
Obama already has!! He wrote two books (on which he's making millions) for the sheeple before he actually did anything to write about.
no shit, and they ate it up
will Ryan (R)
cash-in on being a life-long, Washington-insider after he retires or gets defeated? I'm guessing yes. He'll pull a "DeMint"
Jack Lew is a water carrier for corporations. Like Geithner his resume is mostly about whose dick he sucked rather than bottom line results.
The biggest change will be the name on the door.
You're not being very specific. Budget issues are pretty cut and dried. That means any character assassination thoughts are coming from inside you and not from reality.I must say that I watched the budget committee hearings and Ryan (R) came-off as a spoiled brat. Rep Van Hollen (R) slammed Ryan's FAILBudget in his opening remarks.
that the guy is basically a huckster looking for a job from wall street after he's bilked the taxpayer for his own salary the last 14+ years and tried to stick it to the middle class w/ his budgets for the rich guys.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/15/opinion/krugman-after-the-flimflam.html?hp&_r=3&
he then goes on to dissect Ryan's (R) latest *cough* "budget" that he and his water carrying staff for wall street have concocted.Way back in 2010, when everybody in Washington seemed determined to anoint Representative Paul Ryan as the ultimate Serious, Honest Conservative, I pronounced him a flimflam man. Even then, his proposals were obviously fraudulent: huge cuts in aid to the poor, but even bigger tax cuts for the rich, with all the assertions of fiscal responsibility resting on claims that he would raise trillions of dollars by closing tax loopholes (which he refused to specify) and cutting discretionary spending (in ways he refused to specify).
Jack Lew is a water carrier for corporations. Like Geithner his resume is mostly about whose dick he sucked rather than bottom line results.
The biggest change will be the name on the door.
violent personal attack from typical liberal bigot who is sure he's superior!!
that the guy is basically a huckster looking for a job from wall street after he's bilked the taxpayer for his own salary the last 14+ years and tried to stick it to the middle class w/ his budgets for the rich guys.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/15/opinion/krugman-after-the-flimflam.html?hp&_r=3&
he then goes on to dissect Ryan's (R) latest *cough* "budget" that he and his water carrying staff for wall street have concocted.Way back in 2010, when everybody in Washington seemed determined to anoint Representative Paul Ryan as the ultimate Serious, Honest Conservative, I pronounced him a flimflam man. Even then, his proposals were obviously fraudulent: huge cuts in aid to the poor, but even bigger tax cuts for the rich, with all the assertions of fiscal responsibility resting on claims that he would raise trillions of dollars by closing tax loopholes (which he refused to specify) and cutting discretionary spending (in ways he refused to specify).
Is this the same guy that thought debt was bad when Bush was president?
that the guy is basically a huckster looking for a job from wall street after he's bilked the taxpayer for his own salary the last 14+ years and tried to stick it to the middle class w/ his budgets for the rich guys.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/15/opinion/krugman-after-the-flimflam.html?hp&_r=3&
he then goes on to dissect Ryan's (R) latest *cough* "budget" that he and his water carrying staff for wall street have concocted.
Is this the same guy that thought debt was bad when Bush was president?
yea, thats him...
You're not being very specific. Budget issues are pretty cut and dried. That means any character assassination thoughts are coming from inside you and not from reality.I must say that I watched the budget committee hearings and Ryan (R) came-off as a spoiled brat. Rep Van Hollen (R) slammed Ryan's FAILBudget in his opening remarks.
Cut the bias or you'll get tangled in a really sticky web.
Don't comment on things you haven't witnessed. 
I watched the opening remarks and Ryan's flippant attitude to anyone, in this case Rep Van Hollen, who questioned his double-down budget. STOP NINNY HAMMERING becki!!!
So there is nothing new.
The House passed a budget that they knew the Senate would not pass.
And the Senate passed a budget that they knew the House would not pass.
Both of them need to start compromising, like they are suppose to do.
Both the Senate and the House are acting like spoiled children.
Don't you ever tell me what to say or not or how to say it. You're creating a monster out of one of the few people in America right now who has any semblance of preventing Barack Obama from completely destroying the United States Constitution's Bill of Rights by allying himself with One-world factions in the United Nations who are trying to stick America with a completely binding Small arms agreement to take guns away from all nonmilitary people on this planet "for their own good."You're not being very specific. Budget issues are pretty cut and dried. That means any character assassination thoughts are coming from inside you and not from reality.I must say that I watched the budget committee hearings and Ryan (R) came-off as a spoiled brat. Rep Van Hollen (R) slammed Ryan's FAILBudget in his opening remarks.
Cut the bias or you'll get tangled in a really sticky web.
ummm..... he all but put his feet up on the table while the committee minority ranking member was making his opening statement.
