Kyl;e Rittenhouse will be a billionaire by the time his lawyers are done.

[westwall]

No way? Read on:

Search Results​

Kyle Rittenhouse named in civil suit filed by parents of man ...​

https://www.washingtonpost.com › nation › 2022/01/21

Kyle Rittenhouse faces new legal issues, named in civil suit by ...
https://abc7chicago.com › kyle-rittenhouse-kenosha-shoot...

Jan 22, 2022 — The $10 million lawsuit now includes Rittenhouse, Kenosha and its police department. It could prevent him from making personal profit and gain ...

Could Kyle Rittenhouse face civil penalties despite acquittals
https://www.nbcnews.com › news › us-news › kyle-ritte...

Kyle Rittenhouse Can't Be Tried Again, But Victims' Families ...
https://www.newsweek.com › ... › Lawsuit › Protests

Yeah, good luck with that. Their grounds for adding him are ridiculous. But you go feel good about it. It's about the best you can hope for.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Actually, he violated a shitload of laws, including illegally owning a gun, crossing state lines with a gun, being out past curfew and oh yeah, shooting 3 people.

You didn’t get a single thing right. He was unarmed when he travelled less than twenty miles from home to work. Even the prosecution agreed that it wasn’t illegal for Kyle to own and/or possess the rifle. The curfew wasn’t being enforced and his shootings were ruled legal self-defense.

 

[JoeB131]

Remember, according to your own standard, you can't accuse him of murder until you can prove he's a murderer, and that's going to be very difficult for you to do, seeing as he was on trial for murder and was found not guilty. I know it's tough being hoisted on your own petard, but you set the standard.

Corky, are you still here?

Weird how you keep repeating that lie even after being shown multiple times that it's a lie. Here's the truth. He did NOT cross a state line with a gun. Look it up and stop repeating a lie. Also, his shooting the people was found to be legal, because he stood trial and was found not guilty. Only in your lala land where you get to define all the words and discard anything you don't like does that mean he violated the law by shooting people.

Oh, come on, just because a senile judge and an incompetent prosecutor failed at their jobs doesn't mean we all didn't see EXACTLY what we saw on that tape, this little punk shooting people in the street.

 

[JoeB131]

You didn’t get a single thing right. He was unarmed when he travelled less than twenty miles from home to work. Even the prosecution agreed that it wasn’t illegal for Kyle to own and/or possess the rifle. The curfew wasn’t being enforced and his shootings were ruled legal self-defense.

He was 17. He wasn't allowed to buy a gun in any state.

 

[AZrailwhale]

He was 17. He wasn't allowed to buy a gun in any state.

If that was the case he would have been convicted of that. He wasn’t. You are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own “facts”. At least a half dozen Doppler have proven that you are wrong on every count, but you still keep making the same incorrect arguments. No matter how often you disagree, the sky will still be blue tomorrow just like it was today.

 

[JoeB131]

If that was the case he would have been convicted of that. He wasn’t. You are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own “facts”. At least a half dozen Doppler have proven that you are wrong on every count, but you still keep making the same incorrect arguments. No matter how often you disagree, the sky will still be blue tomorrow just like it was today.

Except the prosecutors weren't focused on the gun charges, or the curfew violations..

They were focused on THE THREE PEOPLE HE SHOT!

Which is kind of hard to get a conviction on when Judge Senile sandbags you at every turn.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Kyle is a lot like George Zimmerman. He had fantasies of being a cop and a hero. Playing pretend isn't a good character trait.

You're a lot like Osama Bin Laden, you think you're the chosen one to make the infidels pay and show the supremacy of Islam.

 

[Bobob]

Where are the lawsuits?

They are coming and are in the works. Lawsuits don't just appear. They take much preparation, time and money.

You didn’t get a single thing right. He was unarmed when he travelled less than twenty miles from home to work. Even the prosecution agreed that it wasn’t illegal for Kyle to own and/or possess the rifle. The curfew wasn’t being enforced and his shootings were ruled legal self-defense.

He got away with murder. Happens some time, especially when there is a judge like that one, who
favored Rittenhouse.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

They are coming and are in the works. Lawsuits don't just appear. They take much preparation, time and money.

He got away with murder. Happens some time, especially when there is a judge like that one, who
favored Rittenhouse.

They have until August 23.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Actually, he violated a shitload of laws, including illegally owning a gun, crossing state lines with a gun, being out past curfew and oh yeah, shooting 3 people.

Every word of that is a lie.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Everywhere. NDA's protect the media assholes, not Sandmann. They ALL required them.

You're not very bright, are you.

Joey is not stupid. Joey is evil.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Except the prosecutors weren't focused on the gun charges, or the curfew violations..

They were focused on THE THREE PEOPLE HE SHOT!

Which is kind of hard to get a conviction on when Judge Senile sandbags you at every turn.

Nope, the prosecutors originally laced the gun charge and agreed to drop it after the defense pointed out and the judge agreed that the gun didn’t meet the definition in the law. Geesh, do some research before insisting on posting stupidity. I used to think you were just ignorant, now I’m convinced that you are willfully stupid and vindictive.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Mommy gonna drive him to Ukraine?

Troll troll troll your boat...

 

[Rigby5]

Why is he lucky if he didn't break any law?

Except that he broke many laws, from illegal possession of a firearm, brandishing a firearm during a physical confrontation, shooting 3 people, and murdering 2 of them.

 

[Rigby5]

Nope, the prosecutors originally laced the gun charge and agreed to drop it after the defense pointed out and the judge agreed that the gun didn’t meet the definition in the law. Geesh, do some research before insisting on posting stupidity. I used to think you were just ignorant, now I’m convinced that you are willfully stupid and vindictive.

Incorrect.
The gun most certainly DID meet the definition of the law.
The judge had it totally backwards.
The law first said the possession of a firearm by a minor is illegal.
Then it gave 3 exceptions where a juvenile could legally be in possession.
One of them was hunting with a permit.
THEN the law said that this exception was not valid if the gun had a short barrel, because it was not for legitimate hunting.
The short barrel reference did not apply at all, because it was nullifying an exception Kyle did not qualify for anyway.
And nullifying a except would not help Kyle.
He needed an additional exception, because he did not qualify for any of them.

Personally I think the judge was not that stupid, but was looking for a way to let Kyle off.

 

[Rigby5]

You didn’t get a single thing right. He was unarmed when he travelled less than twenty miles from home to work. Even the prosecution agreed that it wasn’t illegal for Kyle to own and/or possess the rifle. The curfew wasn’t being enforced and his shootings were ruled legal self-defense.

He was unarmed at first, but that was because he had committed an illegal straw firearm purchase through someone else, who was keeping the illegal rifle for him.

The prosecution lied with it dropped the illegal possession charge.

The murders were ruled self-defense because the prosecutor was corrupt and did not want to prosecute.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

He was unarmed at first, but that was because he had committed an illegal straw firearm purchase through someone else, who was keeping the illegal rifle for him.

The prosecution lied with it dropped the illegal possession charge.

The murders were ruled self-defense because the prosecutor was corrupt and did not want to prosecute.

The “murders” were ruled self defense because they were, in fact, self defense.

The gun charges are irrelevant to the shootings anyway. They have nothing to do with the fact that Rittenhouse was attacked. He was well within his rights to defend himself from angry mobs.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Except that he broke many laws, from illegal possession of a firearm, brandishing a firearm during a physical confrontation, shooting 3 people, and murdering 2 of them.

Except he didn't. The court ruled that he did nothing illegal at all.

 

[Jarlaxle]

He was unarmed at first, but that was because he had committed an illegal straw firearm purchase through someone else, who was keeping the illegal rifle for him.

The prosecution lied with it dropped the illegal possession charge.

The murders were ruled self-defense because the prosecutor was corrupt and did not want to prosecute.

This has to be satire.

 

[westwall]

This has to be satire.

No Rigby is just another fascist moron who doesn't agree with self defense.