Kyle Rittenhouse is doing well

[hadit]

Apparently, some of them did.

That doesn't detract at all from a skateboard being used as a deadly weapon. It can be.

 

[Billo_Really]

They all were. None of them had the right to be there. Don't you remember the curfew? So they were on equal footing and some of them decided they wanted to kill the kid. That was obviously a really dumb mistake.

Rittenpussy was even in the wrong state.

 

[hadit]

You act like I didn't see any evidence at all?

What "evidence" did you see that the jury did not see? Was the "evidence" proven to be for real, not doctored, not edited? Was the chain of custody maintained like evidence needs to be? Were the statements given under oath with penalties for perjury? When you answer those questions, you'll reveal why I say you didn't really see evidence, you saw what someone else wanted you to see and what you wanted to believe.

 

[Billo_Really]

That doesn't detract at all from a skateboard being used as a deadly weapon. It can be.

Wow, love your trucks.

 

[hadit]

Rittenpussy was even in the wrong state.

So were a lot of the rioters. IOW, nothingburger. If he shouldn't have been there, they shouldn't have been there.

 

[Billo_Really]

What exactly was said and can you prove it was him saying it?

He introduced himself as Kyle and said he was there to defend property.

 

[hadit]

Wow, love your trucks.

Yes, catching a skateboard truck in the eye can ruin somebody's day. Next.

 

[hadit]

He introduced himself as Kyle and said he was there to defend property.

Which is what he was doing until he was attacked.

 

[Billo_Really]

So were a lot of the rioters. IOW, nothingburger. If he shouldn't have been there, they shouldn't have been there.

Okay, I'll agree to that.

 

[Soupnazi630]

I'm sorry, but in this case, Rittenpussy WAS the "invader".

He was in public therefore you are wrong

 

[Soupnazi630]

And Rittenpussy was an imminent threat.

No he was not.

He fired at no one except those who attacked him first

 

[Soupnazi630]

There is video of him saying what he was going to do before he did it.

No there is not

You cannot post such a video and no one else has done so

 

[Soupnazi630]

You act like I didn't see any evidence at all?

You never did

you have been contradicting real evidence since day one

 

[Soupnazi630]

What was the question?

Who did he intend to kill

 

[Billo_Really]

He was in public therefore you are wrong

He was in public "armed".

 

[Billo_Really]

No he was not.

He fired at no one except those who attacked him first

That's debatable.

 

[Billo_Really]

No there is not

You cannot post such a video and no one else has done so

Listen junior, fo your homework before you decide to lock horns with the big boys.

 

[Billo_Really]

You never did

you have been contradicting real evidence since day one

What's your definition of "real" evidence?

 

[Billo_Really]

Who did he intend to kill

Liberals.

 

[Hollie]

And Rittenpussy was an imminent threat.

Not true.