Little-Acorn
Gold Member
- Jun 20, 2006
- 10,025
- 2,410
Ambassador Steven warned the Obama administration many times in cables and other communications, that security at the consulate in Benghazi was inadequate and the security situation was getting steadily worse.
The consulate was attacked by terrorists several times in the summer of 2012, including one incident in June 2012 where a bomb blew a 12-foot-wide hole inthe wall. Yet the Obama administration kept taking away American security personnel, replacing them in some cases with Libyan agents.
At the same time, President Obama was proudly announcing to voters before the election, that "Bin Laden is dead and GM is still alive!", apparently trying to convince them that he had defeated Al Qaeda. News of Al Qaeda's increasing attacks, and any increases in troops sent to Libya and other such areas, would not fit into the image Obama was trying to craft.
Is this why he left the consulate without adequate protection? So Obama could convince the voters he had achieved a military victory, when in fact he hadn't? Is this why Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans died?
--------------------------------------------------------
Documents show Stevens worried about Libya security threats, Al Qaeda before consulate attack | Fox News
Documents show Stevens worried about Libya security threats, Al Qaeda before consulate attack
by James Rosen
Published October 19, 2012
Cables show Amb. Stevens voiced concern about...
Across 166 pages of internal State Department documents -- released Friday by a pair of Republican congressmen pressing the Obama administration for more answers on the Benghazi terrorist attack -- slain U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and the security officers assigned to protect him repeatedly sounded alarms to their superiors in Washington about the intensifying lawlessness and violence in Eastern Libya, where Stevens ultimately died.
On Sept. 11 -- the day Stevens and three other Americans were killed -- the ambassador signed a three-page cable, labeled "sensitive," in which he noted "growing problems with security" in Benghazi and "growing frustration" on the part of local residents with Libyan police and security forces. These forces the ambassador characterized as "too weak to keep the country secure."
Edited for Fair Use.
The consulate was attacked by terrorists several times in the summer of 2012, including one incident in June 2012 where a bomb blew a 12-foot-wide hole inthe wall. Yet the Obama administration kept taking away American security personnel, replacing them in some cases with Libyan agents.
At the same time, President Obama was proudly announcing to voters before the election, that "Bin Laden is dead and GM is still alive!", apparently trying to convince them that he had defeated Al Qaeda. News of Al Qaeda's increasing attacks, and any increases in troops sent to Libya and other such areas, would not fit into the image Obama was trying to craft.
Is this why he left the consulate without adequate protection? So Obama could convince the voters he had achieved a military victory, when in fact he hadn't? Is this why Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans died?
--------------------------------------------------------
Documents show Stevens worried about Libya security threats, Al Qaeda before consulate attack | Fox News
Documents show Stevens worried about Libya security threats, Al Qaeda before consulate attack
by James Rosen
Published October 19, 2012
Cables show Amb. Stevens voiced concern about...
Across 166 pages of internal State Department documents -- released Friday by a pair of Republican congressmen pressing the Obama administration for more answers on the Benghazi terrorist attack -- slain U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and the security officers assigned to protect him repeatedly sounded alarms to their superiors in Washington about the intensifying lawlessness and violence in Eastern Libya, where Stevens ultimately died.
On Sept. 11 -- the day Stevens and three other Americans were killed -- the ambassador signed a three-page cable, labeled "sensitive," in which he noted "growing problems with security" in Benghazi and "growing frustration" on the part of local residents with Libyan police and security forces. These forces the ambassador characterized as "too weak to keep the country secure."
Edited for Fair Use.
Last edited by a moderator: