lawsuit over rejection of all lives matter sign

The lawsuit claims the city refused the proposal because officials disagreed with the mural's message.

That is where they will lose. Poor wording. They cannot prove the above and the city can simply deny the reason. All They have to do is say they rejected the mural for public safety concerns saying they worried it might trigger civil unrest.

But that at least allows Turning Point to argue asking why not worry with the BLM sign?

But at that point, the city can argue anything.

Then the city will organize a protest if forced to put up the ALM mural, then cite it as proof their fears were justified.
 
Yes positive affirmation like All Lives Matter has to be rejected for public safety because the Buy Lotsa Mansions crowd can’t control their emotions
 
The only lives that matter are in regard to the group that has no regard for their own lives.
 

Forum List

Back
Top