Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Oh? What was libelous?And he's just beginning! MAGA Nick Sandmanngave them 48 hours to apologize and was met with silence. Oh well, time to crack that whip!
Lawsuit in link.
For truth, for justice, for Nicholas!
Bezos just needs to cut the check for the $250 Million and put this behind him.
He can certainly afford this, it will teach him a lesson to quit with the libel.
Neither article explains what exactly they are suing the WPost for??? What did the post say that they knew was a lie at the time they reported it? And how has this really hurt the kid with the smirk? Seems like his lawyers want this kid to continue to be in the lime light.... surprised his parents went with this suit that seems to have no grounds or merit for a defamation suit and continues with their son being in the spotlight, with what the kid regrets and wishes he would have walked away from, as was stated in the article??
Me thinks his lawyers are ambulance chasers, or Michael Avenati-ish.
The link to the legal action in the earliest thread spells out seven WaPo articles that the suit claims publish or republish false and defamatory claims about Smirk-Boi "assaulting" Philips, "engaging in racist conduct", "instigating" stuff, and the like, and in each case it quotes from each of the articles cited. Yet in every case (I read them all) no such claim exists. They're mostly quotes from bystanders, from Philips, from a nearby photojournalist covering the Native American ceremony, etc. There's not a single instance of the WaPo making any of those claims at all.
These attorneys are apparently willing to look incompetent for money.
Says who?Listen numbnuts, a witness statement should be in your own words especially, if is attached to a complaint as your own words.Exhibit A was not written by him but by his lawyer...
Maybe you haven't heard, but that's what lawyers do.
Done.Demonstrating malice isn't required if you aren't a public figure, fuckstick.I read the complaint and attachments. A few comments. His witness statement attached as Exhibit A was not written by him but by his lawyer or with substantial editing and input from his lawyer. Too much lawyerese to be written by a teenager. Second, there was nothing in the Washington Post articles that indicates who Nick was, where he lived, or his name. Third, there is nothing in the Post story that even comes close to actual malice.
The question is who fingered Nick as the kid. It was not the Washington Post. There may be an out of court settlement, but no where near the amount his lawyers are asking for.
Read the complaint dumb fuck.
Read the lawsuit, you fucking dumbass.Oh? What was libelous?And he's just beginning! MAGA Nick Sandmanngave them 48 hours to apologize and was met with silence. Oh well, time to crack that whip!
Lawsuit in link.
For truth, for justice, for Nicholas!
Bezos just needs to cut the check for the $250 Million and put this behind him.
He can certainly afford this, it will teach him a lesson to quit with the libel.
Fucking moron, the Post didn’t name Sandmann. And everything the post said was quoting others who were there.Read the lawsuit, you fucking dumbass.Oh? What was libelous?And he's just beginning! MAGA Nick Sandmanngave them 48 hours to apologize and was met with silence. Oh well, time to crack that whip!
Lawsuit in link.
For truth, for justice, for Nicholas!
Bezos just needs to cut the check for the $250 Million and put this behind him.
He can certainly afford this, it will teach him a lesson to quit with the libel.
Fucking moron, the Post didn’t name Sandmann. And everything the post said was quoting others who were there.Read the lawsuit, you fucking dumbass.Oh? What was libelous?And he's just beginning! MAGA Nick Sandmanngave them 48 hours to apologize and was met with silence. Oh well, time to crack that whip!
Lawsuit in link.
For truth, for justice, for Nicholas!
Bezos just needs to cut the check for the $250 Million and put this behind him.
He can certainly afford this, it will teach him a lesson to quit with the libel.
Fucking moron, quote the post naming Sandmann. Quote the post saying anything libelous about Sandmann where they weren’t quoting someone they were interviewing....Fucking moron, the Post didn’t name Sandmann. And everything the post said was quoting others who were there.Read the lawsuit, you fucking dumbass.Oh? What was libelous?And he's just beginning! MAGA Nick Sandmanngave them 48 hours to apologize and was met with silence. Oh well, time to crack that whip!
Lawsuit in link.
For truth, for justice, for Nicholas!
Bezos just needs to cut the check for the $250 Million and put this behind him.
He can certainly afford this, it will teach him a lesson to quit with the libel.
Wrong:
In the Post’s own words – albeit a far cry from the true scope of the false and defamatory accusations it made against Nicholas – the readers of the Post’s coverage were “licensed to conclude that the students saw [Phillips] from afar, targeted him and advanced.” Of course, the Post’s readers were also licensed to falsely conclude that Nicholas physically and verbally assaulted Phillips while blocking his egress from a mob of students who were similarly engaged in racist conduct.
The article is behind a paywall.Fucking moron, quote the post naming Sandmann. Quote the post saying anything libelous about Sandmann where they weren’t quoting someone they were interviewing....Fucking moron, the Post didn’t name Sandmann. And everything the post said was quoting others who were there.Read the lawsuit, you fucking dumbass.Oh? What was libelous?Bezos just needs to cut the check for the $250 Million and put this behind him.
He can certainly afford this, it will teach him a lesson to quit with the libel.
Wrong:
In the Post’s own words – albeit a far cry from the true scope of the false and defamatory accusations it made against Nicholas – the readers of the Post’s coverage were “licensed to conclude that the students saw [Phillips] from afar, targeted him and advanced.” Of course, the Post’s readers were also licensed to falsely conclude that Nicholas physically and verbally assaulted Phillips while blocking his egress from a mob of students who were similarly engaged in racist conduct.
G’head, I’ll wait.............
LOLOLOLThe article is behind a paywall.Fucking moron, quote the post naming Sandmann. Quote the post saying anything libelous about Sandmann where they weren’t quoting someone they were interviewing....Fucking moron, the Post didn’t name Sandmann. And everything the post said was quoting others who were there.Read the lawsuit, you fucking dumbass.Oh? What was libelous?
Wrong:
In the Post’s own words – albeit a far cry from the true scope of the false and defamatory accusations it made against Nicholas – the readers of the Post’s coverage were “licensed to conclude that the students saw [Phillips] from afar, targeted him and advanced.” Of course, the Post’s readers were also licensed to falsely conclude that Nicholas physically and verbally assaulted Phillips while blocking his egress from a mob of students who were similarly engaged in racist conduct.
G’head, I’ll wait.............
LOLOLOLThe article is behind a paywall.Fucking moron, quote the post naming Sandmann. Quote the post saying anything libelous about Sandmann where they weren’t quoting someone they were interviewing....Fucking moron, the Post didn’t name Sandmann. And everything the post said was quoting others who were there.Read the lawsuit, you fucking dumbass.
Wrong:
In the Post’s own words – albeit a far cry from the true scope of the false and defamatory accusations it made against Nicholas – the readers of the Post’s coverage were “licensed to conclude that the students saw [Phillips] from afar, targeted him and advanced.” Of course, the Post’s readers were also licensed to falsely conclude that Nicholas physically and verbally assaulted Phillips while blocking his egress from a mob of students who were similarly engaged in racist conduct.
G’head, I’ll wait.............
Which means you can’t prove a word in the lawsuit.
LOLOLLOLOLOLThe article is behind a paywall.Fucking moron, quote the post naming Sandmann. Quote the post saying anything libelous about Sandmann where they weren’t quoting someone they were interviewing....Fucking moron, the Post didn’t name Sandmann. And everything the post said was quoting others who were there.
Wrong:
In the Post’s own words – albeit a far cry from the true scope of the false and defamatory accusations it made against Nicholas – the readers of the Post’s coverage were “licensed to conclude that the students saw [Phillips] from afar, targeted him and advanced.” Of course, the Post’s readers were also licensed to falsely conclude that Nicholas physically and verbally assaulted Phillips while blocking his egress from a mob of students who were similarly engaged in racist conduct.
G’head, I’ll wait.............
Which means you can’t prove a word in the lawsuit.
Wrong, but I'm not giving a dime to the Washington Post. You can't disprove a word in the lawsuit. I'll leave it to L. Lin Wood to prove his case.
LOLOLLOLOLOLThe article is behind a paywall.Fucking moron, quote the post naming Sandmann. Quote the post saying anything libelous about Sandmann where they weren’t quoting someone they were interviewing....Wrong:
In the Post’s own words – albeit a far cry from the true scope of the false and defamatory accusations it made against Nicholas – the readers of the Post’s coverage were “licensed to conclude that the students saw [Phillips] from afar, targeted him and advanced.” Of course, the Post’s readers were also licensed to falsely conclude that Nicholas physically and verbally assaulted Phillips while blocking his egress from a mob of students who were similarly engaged in racist conduct.
G’head, I’ll wait.............
Which means you can’t prove a word in the lawsuit.
Wrong, but I'm not giving a dime to the Washington Post. You can't disprove a word in the lawsuit. I'll leave it to L. Lin Wood to prove his case.
I don’t have to disprove shit. The burden of proof falls upon the accuser.
And he's just beginning! MAGA Nick Sandmanngave them 48 hours to apologize and was met with silence. Oh well, time to crack that whip!
Lawsuit in link.
For truth, for justice, for Nicholas!
How inconvenient that they STILL have no evidence, huh.
I put that challenge out a MONTH ago and never got a response. Not a single one. Zero.
"Apologize for"................................ what?
From your own link:
>> On January 19, 2019, the Post also posted to its Twitter page and published to approximately 13 million followers its First Article with the following false and defamatory captions, all within a span of 14 minutes, and all within the same thread:
- “In an interview with The Post, Omaha Tribe elder Nathan Phillips says he ‘felt like the spirit was talking through me’ as teens jeered and mocked him.”
- “He was singing the American Indian Movement song of unity that serves as a ceremony to send the spirits home. ‘It was getting ugly, and I was thinking: ‘I’ve got to find myself an exit out of this situation and finish my song at the Lincoln Memorial.’”
Whelp, guess what. That's a newspaper QUOTING Philips. Is the quote inaccurate? The fact is Philips DID make the statements, he WAS singing a NAm song, and the teens DID jeer and mock him --- "tomahawk chops" are right there in the video.
- “Phillips, who fought in the Vietnam War, says in an interview ‘I started going that way, and that guy in the hat stood in my way and we were at an impasse. He just blocked my way and wouldn’t allow me to retreat.’” <<
YOUR OWN LINK, Dumbass. Rotsa ruck with egomaniac attorneys getting their names in print by filing frivolous lawsuits for which they have no evidence. This will be laughed out of court, as it should be.
LOLOLLOLOLOLThe article is behind a paywall.Fucking moron, quote the post naming Sandmann. Quote the post saying anything libelous about Sandmann where they weren’t quoting someone they were interviewing....
G’head, I’ll wait.............
Which means you can’t prove a word in the lawsuit.
Wrong, but I'm not giving a dime to the Washington Post. You can't disprove a word in the lawsuit. I'll leave it to L. Lin Wood to prove his case.
I don’t have to disprove shit. The burden of proof falls upon the accuser.
That's absolutely true. But Bezos is going to be deposed in the matter, and if he has any hatred at all against Southerners, Catholics or his President, its going to come out. The motive for this libel will be probed extensively, and jurors in Kenton County aren't going to be that merciful IMHO with some liberal doofus taking and sending dick pics all over the place.
the Briebart article in the 2nd post above, or there about...stated that a group of black Hebrews was shouting and interrupting both the Native American and Catholic school kids/right to life protests, and the Native guy walked over to the right to life group to join them, to stand up to the group of Black Hebrews....?? Or something like that????I saw a rude, intrusive asshole pounding a drum and shouting incomprehensive noise in the face of a child.I didn't see a smirk. I saw a determined indian pounding a drum in the face of a teenager.Neither article explains what exactly they are suing the WPost for??? What did the post say that they knew was a lie at the time they reported it? And how has this really hurt the kid with the smirk? Seems like his lawyers want this kid to continue to be in the lime light.... surprised his parents went with this suit that seems to have no grounds or merit for a defamation suit and continues with their son being in the spotlight, with what the kid regrets and wishes he would have walked away from, as was stated in the article??
Me thinks his lawyers are ambulance chasers, or Michael Avenati-ish.
I didn't really follow the story and probably should not even be posting on this thread, for my lack of thorough knowledge of the incident. I saw a smirk-ish look on the kid's face, but this comes from my brain's interpretation, not from what the press, or other's have said...
in general, these types of stories and arguments are truly a waste of time, and meant to divide us on trivial, meaningless things....
i'm moving on... ya'll carry on!
"Black Israelites" I believe is what they call themselves, a notorious troll group. But they have nothing to do with the Smirk --- that's just a shiny object the Mitch McConnell PR firm has been pointing at to attempt to distract attention FROM the Smirk. They are irrelevant.
The Black Congressional Israelites are an important part of the mix. They were the ones who actually started giving the children shit, and it was the Phony Veteran Nate Phillips who decided to get in on the fun by beating his drum in Mr. Sandmann's face.
Watch the whole video, it shows that fuck up of a human being Nathan Phillips approaching the kids not the other way around...the Briebart article in the 2nd post above, or there about...stated that a group of black Hebrews was shouting and interrupting both the Native American and Catholic school kids/right to life protests, and the Native guy walked over to the right to life group to join them, to stand up to the group of Black Hebrews....?? Or something like that????I saw a rude, intrusive asshole pounding a drum and shouting incomprehensive noise in the face of a child.I didn't see a smirk. I saw a determined indian pounding a drum in the face of a teenager.
I didn't really follow the story and probably should not even be posting on this thread, for my lack of thorough knowledge of the incident. I saw a smirk-ish look on the kid's face, but this comes from my brain's interpretation, not from what the press, or other's have said...
in general, these types of stories and arguments are truly a waste of time, and meant to divide us on trivial, meaningless things....
i'm moving on... ya'll carry on!
"Black Israelites" I believe is what they call themselves, a notorious troll group. But they have nothing to do with the Smirk --- that's just a shiny object the Mitch McConnell PR firm has been pointing at to attempt to distract attention FROM the Smirk. They are irrelevant.
The Black Congressional Israelites are an important part of the mix. They were the ones who actually started giving the children shit, and it was the Phony Veteran Nate Phillips who decided to get in on the fun by beating his drum in Mr. Sandmann's face.
And HOW EXACTLY does that produce The Smirk.
Exactly.
Idiots are smirked at. Sandmann was smirking at the Indian for very much the same reason I am smirking as I address you.the Briebart article in the 2nd post above, or there about...stated that a group of black Hebrews was shouting and interrupting both the Native American and Catholic school kids/right to life protests, and the Native guy walked over to the right to life group to join them, to stand up to the group of Black Hebrews....?? Or something like that????I saw a rude, intrusive asshole pounding a drum and shouting incomprehensive noise in the face of a child.I didn't see a smirk. I saw a determined indian pounding a drum in the face of a teenager.
I didn't really follow the story and probably should not even be posting on this thread, for my lack of thorough knowledge of the incident. I saw a smirk-ish look on the kid's face, but this comes from my brain's interpretation, not from what the press, or other's have said...
in general, these types of stories and arguments are truly a waste of time, and meant to divide us on trivial, meaningless things....
i'm moving on... ya'll carry on!
"Black Israelites" I believe is what they call themselves, a notorious troll group. But they have nothing to do with the Smirk --- that's just a shiny object the Mitch McConnell PR firm has been pointing at to attempt to distract attention FROM the Smirk. They are irrelevant.
The Black Congressional Israelites are an important part of the mix. They were the ones who actually started giving the children shit, and it was the Phony Veteran Nate Phillips who decided to get in on the fun by beating his drum in Mr. Sandmann's face.
And HOW EXACTLY does that produce The Smirk.
Exactly.
