Lazy Women Complains She Has No Food For Her Kids

[Noomi]

You have no way of knowing if she used birth control, or her situation. You Republicans are such judgmental pricks.

 

[KNB]

lamo it is her privacy and her decsion.

Your an idiot.

that's "you're" and "decision"
if it's her business and decision,then why should i be responsible for paying for them?

you shouldn't be and neither should i or any other taxpayer. No way should we be forced to bankroll her life for her.

She had the choice of using birth control or demanding her partner wear a condom. She obviously didn't, hence all her kids. She should be the one supporting them not we taxpayers.

when you outlaw abortion, cut food stamps for poor people, and rich pricks keep shipping all of the jobs to China, Americans don't have any choice but to get on some government assistance program.

 

[Andylusion]

that's "you're" and "decision"
if it's her business and decision,then why should i be responsible for paying for them?

you shouldn't be and neither should i or any other taxpayer. No way should we be forced to bankroll her life for her.

She had the choice of using birth control or demanding her partner wear a condom. She obviously didn't, hence all her kids. She should be the one supporting them not we taxpayers.

when you outlaw abortion, cut food stamps for poor people, and rich pricks keep shipping all of the jobs to China, Americans don't have any choice but to get on some government assistance program.

Oh bull. You are so full of it. You know how many kids I have? Zero. Know how much birth control I, or anyone I know, have used? Zero. Want to know how to not have kids? Keep your legs crossed. Requires zero money, and works 100% of the time. And birth control is not exactly millions of dollars either. If you can afford a cell phone, you can afford birth control.

Further, food stamps is a great way to keep people poor. It's also a great way to make people into indentured voters for leftist idiots.

Lastly, it's leftist anti-rich anti-wealthy anti-business anti-corporation policies that push jobs away. Blame your own self for that.

 

[Andylusion]

You have no way of knowing if she used birth control, or her situation. You Republicans are such judgmental pricks.

Then she should not have been hopping in the sack with a guy to begin with.

And yes, I am judgmental and everyone should be. I don't judge her motives, I have no idea what they are. But I do judge her actions. She was irresponsible one way or the other, and you can see that very clearly in the information given.

Tough snot. Guess what girl? We can vote too. Sucks to be you.

 

[Claudette]

You have no way of knowing if she used birth control, or her situation. You Republicans are such judgmental pricks.

LMAO YOU don't know her situation either.

The one thing I do know is that I don't care what her situation is. She's the one who had sex and five kids and now expects the taxpayers to support her poor choices.

Oh and BTW I'm not a Rep. Your the one who sounds like the judgemental prick.

 

[Claudette]

that's "you're" and "decision"
if it's her business and decision,then why should i be responsible for paying for them?

you shouldn't be and neither should i or any other taxpayer. No way should we be forced to bankroll her life for her.

She had the choice of using birth control or demanding her partner wear a condom. She obviously didn't, hence all her kids. She should be the one supporting them not we taxpayers.

when you outlaw abortion, cut food stamps for poor people, and rich pricks keep shipping all of the jobs to China, Americans don't have any choice but to get on some government assistance program.

What a load of bullshit.

Its not my duty to take care of the poor and its sure not the duty of the taxpayers of America either.

If you think its your duty then whip out YOUR wallet and YOUR checkbook and have at it.

Oh wait. I forgot. Your generous as long as its someone elses money. Never mind.

 

[zeke]

you shouldn't be and neither should i or any other taxpayer. No way should we be forced to bankroll her life for her.

She had the choice of using birth control or demanding her partner wear a condom. She obviously didn't, hence all her kids. She should be the one supporting them not we taxpayers.

when you outlaw abortion, cut food stamps for poor people, and rich pricks keep shipping all of the jobs to China, Americans don't have any choice but to get on some government assistance program.

What a load of bullshit.

Its not my duty to take care of the poor and its sure not the duty of the taxpayers of America either.

If you think its your duty then whip out YOUR wallet and YOUR checkbook and have at it.

Oh wait. I forgot. Your generous as long as its someone elses money. Never mind.

OK, what is your "duty" as an American citizen. (You are) one of the most fortunate people born on the face of the earth to be born an American citizen. And there have been generations of Americans who believed with that blessing that they did have a duty to help their fellow citizens. Particularly the poor. And they did in some form or fashion.

And I do understand that you Republicans don't want that duty any longer. You got yours and fuck everybody else that don't have shit. I understand that mindset.

But with that attitude, what duty do you have to America? Just to put the screws to poor people? What a strange "duty" to have for an American.

I guess we just aren't what we used to be.

 

[Meathead]

OK, what is your "duty" as an American citizen. (You are) one of the most fortunate people born on the face of the earth to be born an American citizen. And there have been generations of Americans who believed with that blessing that they did have a duty to help their fellow citizens. Particularly the poor. And they did in some form or fashion.

And I do understand that you Republicans don't want that duty any longer. You got yours and fuck everybody else that don't have shit. I understand that mindset.

But with that attitude, what duty do you have to America? Just to put the screws to poor people? What a strange "duty" to have for an American.

I guess we just aren't what we used to be.

Your duty then is to define what your fellow citizens' duties are? How did you fall into that? Finally, do you think being a failure gives you that right?

 

[martybegan]

when you outlaw abortion, cut food stamps for poor people, and rich pricks keep shipping all of the jobs to China, Americans don't have any choice but to get on some government assistance program.

What a load of bullshit.

Its not my duty to take care of the poor and its sure not the duty of the taxpayers of America either.

If you think its your duty then whip out YOUR wallet and YOUR checkbook and have at it.

Oh wait. I forgot. Your generous as long as its someone elses money. Never mind.

OK, what is your "duty" as an American citizen. (You are) one of the most fortunate people born on the face of the earth to be born an American citizen. And there have been generations of Americans who believed with that blessing that they did have a duty to help their fellow citizens. Particularly the poor. And they did in some form or fashion.

And I do understand that you Republicans don't want that duty any longer. You got yours and fuck everybody else that don't have shit. I understand that mindset.

But with that attitude, what duty do you have to America? Just to put the screws to poor people? What a strange "duty" to have for an American.

I guess we just aren't what we used to be.

There is a difference between deciding to help your fellow man, and being forced to help by the government. Plus when the government does it you cannot withdraw your support when whatever program is in place becomes a clusterfuck. If it is charity, you can move your money somewhere else. With the government it just continues on and on.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

I think somebody covered this before, but a cellphone seems essential for keeping track of either the kids or whoever's watching them.

Plus, by now there are a lot of people who have a cellphone in lieu of a landline. It becomes their only phone. I would do that myself if I had a cell signal where I live. It would cut my costs.

And I'm not sure how you equate 6 months of cell phone to $600. If that's what you're paying you're not much of a shopper. As for "dumb as a rock, and blowing every extra dollar out of every check, so you have no money in the bank", you don't know that's any part of the story here; it's an assumption. It's all very easy to make assumptions about the lot of somebody you don't know and know you'll never meet.

She doesnt need a $600 smart phone for that.

Are you completely illiterate?

Nobody has evidence that her phone costs $600; that was that wag who quoted an arbitrary figure -- a number he completely pulled out of his ass.

From the beginning of this thread people have been making up fairy tales about this woman they don't even know. Again -- talk is cheap.

Learn to read.

Smart phones aren't cheap,nor are the minutes. Anyway you look at it,this chick has shown a remarkable lack of responsibility and shouldnt be trusted to watch over those kids.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Community meals, churches, friends, family. There is no excuse for letting your children go hungry. None. And of course, there are free breakfasts and lunches at school.

You can probably forget about family and friends. She more then likely owes all of them money already.

I don't care how much you owe me, you ask for food, you can have it.

Absolutely. But if she's anything like my brother she'll ask for cash.

 

[R.D.]

You have no way of knowing if she used birth control, or her situation. You Republicans are such judgmental pricks.

Oh, princess...five kids on birth control?

 

[jon_berzerk]

She doesnt need a $600 smart phone for that.

Are you completely illiterate?

Nobody has evidence that her phone costs $600; that was that wag who quoted an arbitrary figure -- a number he completely pulled out of his ass.

From the beginning of this thread people have been making up fairy tales about this woman they don't even know. Again -- talk is cheap.

Learn to read.

Smart phones aren't cheap,nor are the minutes. Anyway you look at it,this chick has shown a remarkable lack of responsibility and shouldnt be trusted to watch over those kids.

cellphone seems essential

cellphones are non essential

the prezbo said so himself

when he was being critical of those

who cant afford the obamacares

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

You have no way of knowing if she used birth control, or her situation. You Republicans are such judgmental pricks.

Uuuuuhh....She has four kids. Pretty sure thats a rock solid indicator that she didnt use birth control.

 

[R.D.]

You have no way of knowing if she used birth control, or her situation. You Republicans are such judgmental pricks.

Uuuuuhh....She has four kids. Pretty sure thats a rock solid indicator that she didnt use birth control.

No she has four chicken legs, five kids and is too stupid to make soup

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

You have no way of knowing if she used birth control, or her situation. You Republicans are such judgmental pricks.

Uuuuuhh....She has four kids. Pretty sure thats a rock solid indicator that she didnt use birth control.

No she has four chicken legs, five kids and is too stupid to make soup

Oh Damn !!! LMAO!!

 

[Andylusion]

And how do we know when that picture was taken?

This is another thing that drives me nutz.

If you are so poor.... that if you lose your job, you are instantly going to be without food.....

Why do you have a cell phone? Do you not get this?

Cancel the cell phone, and save up that money you are blowing, into a banking account for when you have an emergency like an unexpected lay off.

As I said before, I've been unemployed many times. Never once have I been in a position that I was needing welfare and food stamps, because if I don't have money in the bank, I don't spend money on anything. ANYTHING. I save up money in the bank until I have enough that if something should happen, then I have cash ready.

Let's say that picture is from 6 months prior to her lay off. $600 in the bank more, can buy a lot of rice. You can feed your kids for weeks, before needing food stamps.

I've done this myself. Now granted the longest I have ever been unemployed was about 2 months, because I get out there, and find myself a job. But even then, I had several thousand in the bank, and cut my spending down to ZILCH. You can last a long time, if you buy the bare necessities, and if you are not dumb as a rock, and blowing every extra dollar out of every check, so you have no money in the bank.

When you are that dumb, why should society be forced to pay for you?

And again.... what we teaching these kids? We are teaching them that as an adult you don't have to be responsible and frugal, and society will bail you out when you don't have money set aside for emergencies.

Then we wonder why we have constantly poor people.

I think somebody covered this before, but a cellphone seems essential for keeping track of either the kids or whoever's watching them.

Plus, by now there are a lot of people who have a cellphone in lieu of a landline. It becomes their only phone. I would do that myself if I had a cell signal where I live. It would cut my costs.

And I'm not sure how you equate 6 months of cell phone to $600. If that's what you're paying you're not much of a shopper. As for "dumb as a rock, and blowing every extra dollar out of every check, so you have no money in the bank", you don't know that's any part of the story here; it's an assumption. It's all very easy to make assumptions about the lot of somebody you don't know and know you'll never meet.

You know, for 6000 years of human history, no one had cell phones, and they still kept track of their kids, and the people who were watching them.

Cell phones have only even existed for a mere 30 years. And even then, they were only widely used since 2000. So in a mere 14 years of wide use, suddenly it is an "essential" for life. Really....

I call that BS. When I was broke, I cancelled my cell phone for months on end. Guess what.... life went on. Amazingly, out of all the supposed "emergencies" of life, I didn't have any that could not wait until I got home. If there was anything super important, they had the number to where I worked. Oddly, in all my years, I have never once had something so important, they needed to call my work.

Right now I have a phone that cost me a whooping $35, and has a monthly charge of $15 to operate.

But it's not a touch screen, smart phone, with texting and data, that the phone clearly pictured there most certainly is.

Now I will say that prices have dropped significantly since I purchased my plan today. The prices I was looking at back when I got this phone, were up in the $70 to $100 a month range. Clearly prices have gone down since then.

But the point still is this.... I dont' give crap what you think phones are... they ARE a luxury. I'm sorry, you are wrong. They are not essential. They are a luxury. People have existed for thousands of years with out cell phone service. You *CAN* survive without a phone. I've done that. It is possible. There are MILLIONS of people world wide that survive their entire lives without a cell phone.

You can do it too. Now, I get that you don't *WANT* to live without a cell phone, and that's fine. I have cell phone myself. But.... I FREAKIN WORK FOR IT AND I DON'T DEMAND OTHERS PAY FOR MY LIFE!

When you are collecting charity care from a charity, then you abide by the rules of the charity. If they are ok with you owning a car, and phones, and TVs and cable, and high speed internet..... fine. That's their rules. They can give you free food, clothing, shelter, and you can have whatever you want and get their charity.

But taxing, stealing other people's rightfully earned money, and coercing them under the gun of Government, to give money to others, no, sorry... you don't get to have a cell phone, and a car, and cable TV, and smoke cigarettes, and still get my money. I'm not going to put up with that, and I'll vote for anyone who says they'll stop you from getting my money.

That's how that works. Too bad we can vote too, eh?

 

[Claudette]

when you outlaw abortion, cut food stamps for poor people, and rich pricks keep shipping all of the jobs to China, Americans don't have any choice but to get on some government assistance program.

What a load of bullshit.

Its not my duty to take care of the poor and its sure not the duty of the taxpayers of America either.

If you think its your duty then whip out YOUR wallet and YOUR checkbook and have at it.

Oh wait. I forgot. Your generous as long as its someone elses money. Never mind.

OK, what is your "duty" as an American citizen. (You are) one of the most fortunate people born on the face of the earth to be born an American citizen. And there have been generations of Americans who believed with that blessing that they did have a duty to help their fellow citizens. Particularly the poor. And they did in some form or fashion.

And I do understand that you Republicans don't want that duty any longer. You got yours and fuck everybody else that don't have shit. I understand that mindset.

But with that attitude, what duty do you have to America? Just to put the screws to poor people? What a strange "duty" to have for an American.

I guess we just aren't what we used to be.

Your an idiot my friend.

Number one. Where is it written that anyone has a DUTY to take care of anyone?? I'll make it easy. It ain't written anywhere. Just because you think everyone should fall all over themselves showering the poor with someone elses money Doesn't make it someone's duty.


Number two. I could give shit one about poor people. If they don't want to be poor then they need to get off their asses, make responsible decisions. They need to do what it takes to change their circumstances. Not me, you or anyone else. Its their DUTY to take care of themselves.

Number three. Its called charity and I pick and choose the charities I give to. There used to be loads of philantropists and charitable people in this country until the Govt decided that the taxpayers of America should become the charity. All brought to you by the Democrats.

Number four. You bet I got mine. I worked my ass off for everything I have asshole. No one ever GAVE me anything and I sure as hell didn't expect them to. I made responsible decsions in my life and never depended on anyone for anything. Everything I have I earned on my own.

Number five. I'm not a Rep and you must be one of those Democratic assholes who decided that we taxpayers need to bankroll other peoples lives. God forbid they take care of themselves.

Yup. We have people like you to thank for the freeloaders in this country. Freeloaders who have no problem using someone elses money to fund their lives. Freeloaders who could give shit one where the money comes from or who earned it. All they care about is that the money is in that little EBT card every month.

Oh and don't hold your breath for a big thankyou there asshole because you'll croak waiting for it.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

This is another thing that drives me nutz.

If you are so poor.... that if you lose your job, you are instantly going to be without food.....

Why do you have a cell phone? Do you not get this?

Cancel the cell phone, and save up that money you are blowing, into a banking account for when you have an emergency like an unexpected lay off.

As I said before, I've been unemployed many times. Never once have I been in a position that I was needing welfare and food stamps, because if I don't have money in the bank, I don't spend money on anything. ANYTHING. I save up money in the bank until I have enough that if something should happen, then I have cash ready.

Let's say that picture is from 6 months prior to her lay off. $600 in the bank more, can buy a lot of rice. You can feed your kids for weeks, before needing food stamps.

I've done this myself. Now granted the longest I have ever been unemployed was about 2 months, because I get out there, and find myself a job. But even then, I had several thousand in the bank, and cut my spending down to ZILCH. You can last a long time, if you buy the bare necessities, and if you are not dumb as a rock, and blowing every extra dollar out of every check, so you have no money in the bank.

When you are that dumb, why should society be forced to pay for you?

And again.... what we teaching these kids? We are teaching them that as an adult you don't have to be responsible and frugal, and society will bail you out when you don't have money set aside for emergencies.

Then we wonder why we have constantly poor people.

I think somebody covered this before, but a cellphone seems essential for keeping track of either the kids or whoever's watching them.

Plus, by now there are a lot of people who have a cellphone in lieu of a landline. It becomes their only phone. I would do that myself if I had a cell signal where I live. It would cut my costs.

And I'm not sure how you equate 6 months of cell phone to $600. If that's what you're paying you're not much of a shopper. As for "dumb as a rock, and blowing every extra dollar out of every check, so you have no money in the bank", you don't know that's any part of the story here; it's an assumption. It's all very easy to make assumptions about the lot of somebody you don't know and know you'll never meet.

You know, for 6000 years of human history, no one had cell phones, and they still kept track of their kids, and the people who were watching them.

Cell phones have only even existed for a mere 30 years. And even then, they were only widely used since 2000. So in a mere 14 years of wide use, suddenly it is an "essential" for life. Really....

I call that BS. When I was broke, I cancelled my cell phone for months on end. Guess what.... life went on. Amazingly, out of all the supposed "emergencies" of life, I didn't have any that could not wait until I got home. If there was anything super important, they had the number to where I worked. Oddly, in all my years, I have never once had something so important, they needed to call my work.

Right now I have a phone that cost me a whooping $35, and has a monthly charge of $15 to operate.

But it's not a touch screen, smart phone, with texting and data, that the phone clearly pictured there most certainly is.

Now I will say that prices have dropped significantly since I purchased my plan today. The prices I was looking at back when I got this phone, were up in the $70 to $100 a month range. Clearly prices have gone down since then.

But the point still is this.... I dont' give crap what you think phones are... they ARE a luxury. I'm sorry, you are wrong. They are not essential. They are a luxury. People have existed for thousands of years with out cell phone service. You *CAN* survive without a phone. I've done that. It is possible. There are MILLIONS of people world wide that survive their entire lives without a cell phone.

You can do it too. Now, I get that you don't *WANT* to live without a cell phone, and that's fine. I have cell phone myself. But.... I FREAKIN WORK FOR IT AND I DON'T DEMAND OTHERS PAY FOR MY LIFE!

When you are collecting charity care from a charity, then you abide by the rules of the charity. If they are ok with you owning a car, and phones, and TVs and cable, and high speed internet..... fine. That's their rules. They can give you free food, clothing, shelter, and you can have whatever you want and get their charity.

But taxing, stealing other people's rightfully earned money, and coercing them under the gun of Government, to give money to others, no, sorry... you don't get to have a cell phone, and a car, and cable TV, and smoke cigarettes, and still get my money. I'm not going to put up with that, and I'll vote for anyone who says they'll stop you from getting my money.

That's how that works. Too bad we can vote too, eh?

Gotta admit I love my smartphone. But if for some unlikely reason I went broke?
The smartphone is gone,along with the cable the boat and anything else thats a luxury item.
And the idea that I would ask someone else to pay for those luxuries would never cross my mind.

 

[R.D.]

I think somebody covered this before, but a cellphone seems essential for keeping track of either the kids or whoever's watching them.

Plus, by now there are a lot of people who have a cellphone in lieu of a landline. It becomes their only phone. I would do that myself if I had a cell signal where I live. It would cut my costs.

And I'm not sure how you equate 6 months of cell phone to $600. If that's what you're paying you're not much of a shopper. As for "dumb as a rock, and blowing every extra dollar out of every check, so you have no money in the bank", you don't know that's any part of the story here; it's an assumption. It's all very easy to make assumptions about the lot of somebody you don't know and know you'll never meet.

She doesnt need a $600 smart phone for that.

Are you completely illiterate?

Nobody has evidence that her phone costs $600; that was that wag who quoted an arbitrary figure -- a number he completely pulled out of his ass.

From the beginning of this thread people have been making up fairy tales about this woman they don't even know. Again -- talk is cheap.

Learn to read.

"Well, look at your budget, cable bill, telephone, cell phone bill, you're just not prioritizing things right"....Obama even disagrees with you