Bfgrn
Gold Member
- Apr 4, 2009
- 16,829
- 2,492
- 245
Not sure how Kennedy was sitting in his car, the angle of entry, if his shirt may have been too big for his body, what type of knot he had in his necktie, etc...a million variables dumbfuck.
What isn't debateable is this:
Oswald owned the fucking murder weapon.
Oswald worked in the fucking building where the bullets came from.
Oswald killed a fucking cop right after he killed Kennedy.
On any planet in any solar system that means he's guilty dumbass. You're hung up on some drawing done 50 years ago and screaming "ah-hah". Nobody buys it. Nobody cares. And everybody thinks you suck cock.
Shove that up your ass.
THE QUESTION, and the title of the thread is: Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone Unless you can explain to me in DETAIL how a bullet traveling on a downward trajectory that enters the President's back at at the level of the third thoracic vertebrae can exit a wound in his throat, 4-6 inches higher anatomically, nicking the top of his tie, and THEN somehow resume a downward angle, you have a second gunman.
There is NO getting around these wounds IF you are going to claim Oswald was the lone assassin. Your evidence does NOTHING but implicate Oswald in the shooting. But it DOESN'T prove he acted alone. You can call me all the names you want and send me more neg reps. You MUST explain these wounds, because the law of physics says it is impossible for this to occur.
Do you even know what wounds we are talking about on the autopsy face sheet? The one marked '7 x 4' on the posterior diagram is the alleged entrance wound at the level of the third thoracic vertebrae (in his BACK)
The one marked '6.5' on the anterior diagram is the alleged exit wound in his throat.
You need to step up to the plate and act and think like an adult. You childish rants are not working.
Wow great point..
According to your analysis the bullet was fired from the trunk of Kennedys car. Thats the only location you could fire from and have a bullet enter the President's back at at the level of the third thoracic vertebrae can exit a wound in his throat, 4-6 inches higher anatomically, nicking the top of his tie
You just cracked the case wide open
Actually, according to the autopsy, the back wound never entered the chest cavity, much less exited his throat:
-------------------------------
The bullet wound was not dissected, even though dissection is the only certain means of tracking a bullet's path through the body. At the trial of Clay Shaw in 1969, one of the autopsy pathologists, Dr. Pierre Finck, admitted that the autopsy team was ordered by a general or admiral not to dissect the back wound. Since no dissection took place, it is obvious that no bullet track was ever revealed at the autopsy.
Even though the wound was not dissected, the body was opened up during the autopsy. The autopsy pathologists noticed bruising of the strap muscles on the right side of the neck and also on the very top of the right lung. This led to the unproven assumption that the bruising was caused by the bullet as it passed from the back through the upper thoracic cavity and exited out of the throat. . . .
Furthermore, the air in the tissues, the bruising, the laceration are no more indicative of a bullet's going from back to front than they are of a bullet's going from front to back. The fact that the hole in the front of the throat was only half as large as the hole in the back suggested either that they were both entrance wound or that the hole in the throat was the wound of entrance and that in the back was the exit wound. (Kurtz, Crime of the Century, Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1982, pp. 73-74)
The fact that the autopsy doctors did not observe a bullet path from the back wound to the throat wound is evident in their descriptions of the back and throat wounds. They said the back wound was "presumably" a wound of entrance, and the throat wound "presumably" a wound of exit. If they had seen a track from the back wound to the throat wound, they wouldn't have had to "presume" anything. Even lone-gunman theorist Dr. John Lattimer admitted there is only "circumstantial" evidence of a bullet track between the back wound and the throat wound. The back wound was not dissected, and only dissection of the wound through the body would have provided us with conclusive proof of the missile's path.
We know from released documents relating to the autopsy that on the night of the autopsy the pathologists were absolutely positive the back wound did NOT have an exit point. We also know they probed the wound repeatedly, that they removed the chest organs and probed the wound again and still saw no exit point, and that one of the medical technicians at the autopsy, James Jenkins, could see the end of the surgical probe pushing against the lining of the chest cavity. Jenkins observed there was "no entry" into the chest cavity:
I remember looking inside the chest cavity and I could see the probe . . . through the pleura [the lining of the chest cavity]. . . . You could actually see where it [the probe] was making an indentation . . . where it was pushing the skin up. . . . There was no entry into the chest cavity. . . . No way that could have exited in the front because it was then low in the chest cavity. (In Anthony Summers, Not in Your Lifetime, New York: Marlowe and Company, 1998, p. 34)
Several doctors have noted there is no way a bullet could have gone from the back wound to the throat wound without smashing directly through the seventh cervical transverse process of the spine or without causing considerable lung damage (see, for example, Dr. David Mantik, "The JFK Assassination: Cause for Doubt," in James Fetzer, editor, Assassination Science, Chicago: Catfeet Press, 1998, pp. 102-103). Such damage is not mentioned in the autopsy report and is not seen on the autopsy x-rays.
Fact vs. Myth
BUT...the Warren Commission found a simple way of avoiding all these inconvenient forensic and physical 'issues'...THEY MOVED THE WOUND up to his neck...
Warren Commission Exhibit 386