Leftists Freak Out at the Thought of Cameras Exposing Fanatical CRT Teachers

[SweetSue92]

You keep putting out that bullshit! What software? How much does it cost?

That completely defeats the purpose in having the cameras, doesn't it?

It exists only in your overactive and paranoid imagination.

Here is the evidence that it does exist

All I am interested is the lies that the teachers are telling the children so a video record of the teachers is all I want

Customer Analytics Software for Retail - Raydiant | Raydiant

CX analytics for brick-and-mortar. Boost sales and connect with customers through personalized messaging based on real-time insights. Maximize your ROI.

sightcorp.com

Ok, I have had it with your fucking ignorance. If the CRT is NOT in the schools curriculum, why would a teacher, especially a math, science, or language arts teacher, ever address such a thing?

You have shit for brains, fucktard! That face-blur software is primarily for identification purposes if you had bothered to read the site. It does facial recognition! Now, you still have not shown how much that would cost for a typical school. Why is this so hard for you? I know why! You are simply stupid to the bone!

Every single parent in the class would know, even with "facial blurring technology", whose kid is who. Besides, since Mac would want to HEAR what's going on, the children would be heard as well. The facial blurring would do nothing and he must know it, but arguing with people like him and Grandpa is like trying to nail jello. Remember the braintrust who wanted kindergarteners in seats in rows all day long, with the teacher in one spot so he/she can be recorded? That's what we're dealing with here.

 

[Mac-7]

Maybe if you trust the public school teachers in your local school district so very little, you should homeschool your kids.

I think school choice is the best solition

 

[SweetSue92]

Does it blur identities to the point that the other parents in the classroom do not know who the students are for the purposes of discipline and grading?

They can probably figure it out

And that is not against the law

You believe that there are no privacy laws in regards to schools, Mac?

The rank ignorance

 

[SweetSue92]

Maybe if you trust the public school teachers in your local school district so very little, you should homeschool your kids.

I think school choice is the best solition

I hope you realize that some of the biggest offenders of CRT are the private schools in NYC. I'm not opposed to school choice. Just know that. Now inform yourself.

 

[SweetSue92]

Last time. You do not have a right to see the other children in the classroom getting extra help, having grades distributed, getting disciplined. Sorry if that hurts you fee-fees.

You have no right to prevent patents from seeing what you do with their children all day

Here is the deal, Mac. When you send your child to a school, you are ALSO sending them to a place where there are children WHO ARE NOT YOURS. You rather agree to that. And you have NO RIGHT to see what THEY do all day. Get that?

It's like an unspoken agreement. If you really need to see every little bit of what goes on in your child's life all day, school is not for you or them. Homeschool them, and then good luck cutting those apron strings.

Let me put this another way. If it was just me teaching Mac's kids, you can film me and watch me all the livelong day. It's not ME I'm concerned about, believe it or not. But if it's MAC looking in on Mac's kids plus all the other kids THAT ARE NOT YOUR KIDS, no. That's creepy and strange and all kinds of what?

Come on now.

 

[Mac-7]

You believe that there are no privacy laws in regards to schools, Mac?

Sure

No cameras in the bathrooms and showers

And you may find some really lib district that prohibits cameras in the classroom

But thats just local policy

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

If the CRT is NOT in the schools curriculum, why would a teacher, especially a math, science, or language arts teacher, ever address such a thing?

All the teachers spilling out of the lib puppy mills are under suspicion of brainwashing on a variety of topics

CRT is just the spark that lit the fuse

And with such a profane and short tempered attitude as yours you should not be a teacher at all

What lit your tampon's fuse? I retired 3 years ago dumbass! We never have to worry about you simply because you are stupid and incapable of teaching a fish to swim.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Does it blur identities to the point that the other parents in the classroom do not know who the students are for the purposes of discipline and grading?

They can probably figure it out

And that is not against the law

You keep making this claim that is not against the law. You are dead wrong! Why are you so stupid? Many teachers have told you that you are wrong, but you blather on!

 

[SweetSue92]

Does it blur identities to the point that the other parents in the classroom do not know who the students are for the purposes of discipline and grading?

They can probably figure it out

And that is not against the law

You keep making this claim that is not against the law. You are dead wrong! Why are you so stupid? Many teachers have told you that you are wrong, but you blather on!

So this is on front page Google, pull down menu. This is 3rd grade level stuff:

People have the right to be free from intrusion into personal matters, even in a school setting. The right to student privacy extends to education records, admissions, and conduct, for example.

 

[SweetSue92]

Does it blur identities to the point that the other parents in the classroom do not know who the students are for the purposes of discipline and grading?

They can probably figure it out

And that is not against the law

You keep making this claim that is not against the law. You are dead wrong! Why are you so stupid? Many teachers have told you that you are wrong, but you blather on!

Tricky application of just the FEDERAL law Mac says doesn't even exist:

Frequently Asked Questions | Protecting Student Privacy

studentprivacy.ed.gov

 

[Oldestyle]

Leftists Freak Out at the Thought of Cameras Exposing Fanatical CRT Teachers​

Nolte: Leftists Freak Out at the Thought of Cameras Exposing Fanatical CRT Teachers

The far-left HuffPost is freaking over Tucker Carlson's suggestion that cameras be placed in public school classrooms.

www.breitbart.com

7 Jul 2021 ~~ By John Nolte
The far-left HuffPost is freaking over Tucker Carlson’s suggestion that cameras be placed in public school classrooms.
“Tucker Carlson Goes Full ‘1984’ With ‘Cameras In The Classroom’ Proposal,” screams the left-wing outlet’s headline.
“The Fox News personality suggested police-style body cameras to check on what every teacher is telling their students,” the sub-headline reads.
“Carlson, in a rant reminiscent of something from George Orwell’s classic dystopian novel ‘1984,’” author Lee Moran bleats, “called the teaching that racism is at least partly systemic… a ‘civilization-ending poison’ and ‘B.S.’”
Before we go any further… I’ve read 1984 at least three times and am unfamiliar with anything Tucker said that is “reminiscent of something from George Orwell’s classic dystopian novel[.]”
In fact, Tucker’s suggestion is the exact opposite of “something from George Orwell’s classic dystopian novel[.]” Tucker is suggesting we monitor the government. 1984 is about (among other things) the government monitoring private citizens. So Moran got his metaphor exactly wrong, which tells me he’s probably a product of government-run public schools.
Regardless, he huffs on, “He warned ‘we can’t really be sure’ how far it is being spread until ‘we finally get cameras in the classroom, as we put them on the chests of police officers.’”
What I found interesting about this piece is that other than screaming 1984!!!, no case or argument is made against the idea of cameras in government-run public school classrooms.
Is there one?
Is there a good argument against this kind of accountability and transparency?
~Snip~
The real issue here is just how brazenly public school teachers have become when it comes to teaching our kids pretty much everything but what they need to know. Leftists are never happier than when they’ve insinuated themselves between parent and child. Too many schools can’t teach kids to read or write, but they are sure teaching them to hate their country and all about “demi-sexuality.”
Tucker’s smart to bring this up, to make it part of the national conversation. Teachers and their evil unions are going to have a hard time explaining why they oppose such a thing. They will be on defense, which is exactly where they belong.

Comment:
Cameras would certainly expose incompetence, along with indoctrination and its techniques, favoritism, laziness, CRT, anything BLM, gay rights, religion bashing, white guilt/privilege advancement, etc.
Easy to see why Progressive Marxist/DSA Commies oppose this.
What have the teachers got to hide? We are in the age of Zoom and zero in-class learning. Stick a camera in the corner so those students who wish to work from home and via Zoom can. Oh, and you need to record the classes in case the student was out for some reason. All the better if the parents can review what is being taught in class.
If we demand body-cams for cops, why not cameras in the classroom?

Hahahaha, the party of small government, personal Liberty and freedom wants to put cameras in classrooms?! Are you shitting me?! What a bunch of unprincipled idiots

So it's fine to put cameras on Police...but not fine to put them on the people we entrust with teaching our impressionable children? Are you shitting me? What possible reason would teachers have for not wanting parents to see what it is that they do in their classrooms?

How are the cameras on police? Body cams do not show the police officer, but what he or she sees, and it is not broadcast for your perverse entertainment.

Perverse entertainment? What is it you think goes on in those classrooms that you think I'm going to find entertaining?

Many proponents of cameras in the classroom are pedophiles who want a free show.

Did you just call me a pedophile?

If the shoe fits, wear that bitch!

No I did not call you a pedophile although some of your compatriots show all the signs.

So you did call me that but then you didn't have the stones to back it up? Aren't you the tough guy!

You need remedial reading! Fornicate thyself and the steed upon which though didst arrive!

You're one of those on line cowards that talks shit about people instead of making a valid argument and then pretends they didn't do it because they know they're going to get in trouble. Nobody in this debate is a pedophile and you're an ass wipe for making the claim!

So you got someone to read you the post showing I was not talking about you? Why won't you admit that?

Though may ingest a satchel of Richards.

Who were you accusing of being a pedophile? You made the claim. Why are you running from it now like a little fucking coward? You're some Admiral! Someone like you should be swabbing decks! You don't have enough back bone to command others.

If it is not you, why the fuck do you care? You can't even fucking read! If I were you, I'd crawl off back under that rock I slithered out from until I learned to read and carry on a reasoned debate.

Why do I care that you accuse people of being pedophiles because you can't come up with a valid argument? You were a teacher? That right there is why our education system is so FUBARED! To have an idiot like you teaching impressionable kids borders on child abuse!

You really have no right to discuss this topic any longer. You have consistently proven you cannot read, made false accusations, and personal attacks. You have failed to even remotely come up with a valid argument and I personally feel sorry for you and anyone you come in contact with. Hopefully, you did not reproduce so that the ignorance will not be passed to future generations. Now, kiss my ass and come up with something factual to discuss instead of your paranoid delusions. If not, I will place your happy ass on ignore with all of the others on this message board with room temp IQs.

LOL Did you just accuse someone of making false accusations and personal attacks? You accused everyone on the board that doesn't agree with YOUR viewpoint of being a pedophile, you buffoon! Now you're going to get your panties in a bunch and start bloviating about putting people on ignore? You're a world class idiot. A male version of a Karen!

 

[Oldestyle]

Leftists Freak Out at the Thought of Cameras Exposing Fanatical CRT Teachers​

Nolte: Leftists Freak Out at the Thought of Cameras Exposing Fanatical CRT Teachers

The far-left HuffPost is freaking over Tucker Carlson's suggestion that cameras be placed in public school classrooms.

www.breitbart.com

7 Jul 2021 ~~ By John Nolte
The far-left HuffPost is freaking over Tucker Carlson’s suggestion that cameras be placed in public school classrooms.
“Tucker Carlson Goes Full ‘1984’ With ‘Cameras In The Classroom’ Proposal,” screams the left-wing outlet’s headline.
“The Fox News personality suggested police-style body cameras to check on what every teacher is telling their students,” the sub-headline reads.
“Carlson, in a rant reminiscent of something from George Orwell’s classic dystopian novel ‘1984,’” author Lee Moran bleats, “called the teaching that racism is at least partly systemic… a ‘civilization-ending poison’ and ‘B.S.’”
Before we go any further… I’ve read 1984 at least three times and am unfamiliar with anything Tucker said that is “reminiscent of something from George Orwell’s classic dystopian novel[.]”
In fact, Tucker’s suggestion is the exact opposite of “something from George Orwell’s classic dystopian novel[.]” Tucker is suggesting we monitor the government. 1984 is about (among other things) the government monitoring private citizens. So Moran got his metaphor exactly wrong, which tells me he’s probably a product of government-run public schools.
Regardless, he huffs on, “He warned ‘we can’t really be sure’ how far it is being spread until ‘we finally get cameras in the classroom, as we put them on the chests of police officers.’”
What I found interesting about this piece is that other than screaming 1984!!!, no case or argument is made against the idea of cameras in government-run public school classrooms.
Is there one?
Is there a good argument against this kind of accountability and transparency?
~Snip~
The real issue here is just how brazenly public school teachers have become when it comes to teaching our kids pretty much everything but what they need to know. Leftists are never happier than when they’ve insinuated themselves between parent and child. Too many schools can’t teach kids to read or write, but they are sure teaching them to hate their country and all about “demi-sexuality.”
Tucker’s smart to bring this up, to make it part of the national conversation. Teachers and their evil unions are going to have a hard time explaining why they oppose such a thing. They will be on defense, which is exactly where they belong.

Comment:
Cameras would certainly expose incompetence, along with indoctrination and its techniques, favoritism, laziness, CRT, anything BLM, gay rights, religion bashing, white guilt/privilege advancement, etc.
Easy to see why Progressive Marxist/DSA Commies oppose this.
What have the teachers got to hide? We are in the age of Zoom and zero in-class learning. Stick a camera in the corner so those students who wish to work from home and via Zoom can. Oh, and you need to record the classes in case the student was out for some reason. All the better if the parents can review what is being taught in class.
If we demand body-cams for cops, why not cameras in the classroom?

Hahahaha, the party of small government, personal Liberty and freedom wants to put cameras in classrooms?! Are you shitting me?! What a bunch of unprincipled idiots

So it's fine to put cameras on Police...but not fine to put them on the people we entrust with teaching our impressionable children? Are you shitting me? What possible reason would teachers have for not wanting parents to see what it is that they do in their classrooms?

How are the cameras on police? Body cams do not show the police officer, but what he or she sees, and it is not broadcast for your perverse entertainment.

Perverse entertainment? What is it you think goes on in those classrooms that you think I'm going to find entertaining?

Many proponents of cameras in the classroom are pedophiles who want a free show.

Did you just call me a pedophile?

If the shoe fits, wear that bitch!

No I did not call you a pedophile although some of your compatriots show all the signs.

So you did call me that but then you didn't have the stones to back it up? Aren't you the tough guy!

You need remedial reading! Fornicate thyself and the steed upon which though didst arrive!

You're one of those on line cowards that talks shit about people instead of making a valid argument and then pretends they didn't do it because they know they're going to get in trouble. Nobody in this debate is a pedophile and you're an ass wipe for making the claim!

So you got someone to read you the post showing I was not talking about you? Why won't you admit that?

Though may ingest a satchel of Richards.

Who were you accusing of being a pedophile? You made the claim. Why are you running from it now like a little fucking coward? You're some Admiral! Someone like you should be swabbing decks! You don't have enough back bone to command others.

If it is not you, why the fuck do you care? You can't even fucking read! If I were you, I'd crawl off back under that rock I slithered out from until I learned to read and carry on a reasoned debate.

What's laughable is that you actually think calling anyone who disagrees with you a "pedophile" is carrying on a reasoned debate!

I did not accuse you of being a pedophile. That should be your only concern if it is true.

Oh no...you accused EVERYONE who disagrees with you of being a pedophile! That's how petty and idiotic you are! You use John Wayne as your avatar? He must be rolling over in his grave at that!

 

[Mac-7]

What lit your tampon's fuse? I retired 3 years ago dumbass! We never have to worry about you simply because you are stupid and incapable of teaching a fish to swim.

Based on your internet attitude I say good riddance

 

[Mac-7]

You keep making this claim that is not against the law. You are dead wrong! Why are you so stupid? Many teachers have told you that you are wrong, but you blather on!

The teachers are making an unsupported claim

 

[SweetSue92]

You keep making this claim that is not against the law. You are dead wrong! Why are you so stupid? Many teachers have told you that you are wrong, but you blather on!

The teachers are making an unsupported claim

Supported my claim with a link to the federal law. There are state laws as well

 

[Mac-7]

So this is on front page Google, pull down menu. This is 3rd grade level stuff:

People have the right to be free from intrusion into personal matters, even in a school setting. The right to student privacy extends to education records, admissions, and conduct, for example.

Oh well, if some unnamed lib at Google says so who am I to argue?

 

[Mac-7]

Supported my claim with a link to the federal law. There are state laws as well

No federal law exists banning security cameras in public school classrooms

 

[SweetSue92]

Supported my claim with a link to the federal law. There are state laws as well

No federal law exists banning security cameras in public school classrooms

Nice goalposts. We're talking about privacy laws. If you "give parents a code" by which they could watch everything in the classroom LIVE you best believe a host of those privacy laws are violated, which you know, which is why you snuck in "security cameras" suddenly

Admit it. You have to back off the live cameras with a code. We know.

 

[Mac-7]

Supported my claim with a link to the federal law. There are state laws as well

No federal law exists banning security cameras in public school classrooms

If students have absolute privacy then you could not even have classrooms where more than one student was present
Nice goalposts. We're talking about privacy laws. If you "give parents a code" by which they could watch everything in the classroom LIVE you best believe a host of those privacy laws are violated, which you know, which is why you snuck in "security cameras" suddenly

Admit it. You have to back off the live cameras with a code. We know.

 

[Mac-7]

which you know, which is why you snuck in "security cameras" suddenly

Security is the reason for the cameras

Parents have a right to protect their children from bad teachers