LESBIANS: What Will They Think of Next?

[Conservative65]

Does that mean I can buy an automatic weapon?

You do not need one. Your brain is on full-automatic stupid.

Again, a good for nothing Liberal trying to determine what someone else does or doesn't need. Funny how you say something related to what's actually in the Constitution is wrong (owning guns) yet support something that isn't remotely in it as OK (abortion).

I have been fully conservative ever since you were walking around in diapers.

I have supported gun owners rights since 1986.

When would I have been walking around in diapers. Years?

Prove it.

Are you proving with your butt plug underneath and your right hand glued to the keyboard you lean towards being gay?

I can smell your diapers from here.

So, you're statement of "I've been fully conservative since you were walking around in diapers" was just more tripe?

Thought so.

 

[Conservative65]

Why wouldn't you if you think what you've done is OK?

Because I might get slapped a time or two?

Excuses?

The thought of getting slapped doesn't make you pause. You are proving again, your brain is certifiably empty.

You're proving you're a coward by refusing to stand up for what you say is right but keep making excuses.

I have never had such a vacant discussion in my entire life.

I bet dykes know how you feel. But do continue with your meltdown.

You're the one saying you're not willing to stand up and shout out for what you believe because you might get slapped.

 

[Pop23]

Please, tell me those that biology demands.

You've been trying to dodge your main issue for several pages now. Don't you think it's about time for you to step up to the plate so we can see what you've got? Perhaps you don't remember what is you said, so let me refresh your memory ..........

Homosexuality is simply a delusion ...

You're no closer to giving that statement any credibility right now, than you were the moment you posted it. I have a suspicion. May I tell you about it? I think that you made that statement whilst maneuvering a labyrinth of ill-logic and now I've blocked all of the exits so you can't find your way back to sense. Am I right? Or at least close?

You made the statement about biology and how it's just loaded with options.

Back it up. Let's see how those "options" fit in the discussion.

Building a text wall doesn't answer the question.

 

[GLASNOST]

You made the statement about biology and how it's just loaded with options.
Back it up. Let's see how those "options" fit in the discussion.
Building a text wall doesn't answer the question.

I entered this discussion with you because I thought you had earnest intentions. Now I think you're just trolling. Sorry, but I no longer care what you think.

 

[Pop23]

You made the statement about biology and how it's just loaded with options.
Back it up. Let's see how those "options" fit in the discussion.
Building a text wall doesn't answer the question.

I entered this discussion with you because I thought you had earnest intentions. Now I think you're just trolling. Sorry, but I no longer care what you think.

In other words, YOU CAN'T BACK UP YOUR CHALLANGE!

Classic!

 

[GLASNOST]

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

I met a transman who came between a man and the pregnant mother of his child. He spent seven years with the woman and the child.

Eventually the guy managed to save the woman. The transman wanted custody of the child. The court ended up giving him a two week block every year. The child calls him dad apparently.

He also killed his cat and blamed the neighbour's dog. So chased that neighbour away. They had to sell up and leave, eventually. Obviously he had divided the community against them.

To give a small example, once he offered me a potato scallop. He knew I couldn't eat chicken salt. After I ate it, he casually said, "oh that had chicken salt"

I said, " now I'll be sick for 3 days". He just looked at be with a bitchy nonchalant, complacent face and shrugged.

So anyone who thinks transmen and lesbians aren't dangerous, have conversation with the poor chap who lost his baby through the formative years. So pointless, such a waste.

I've had friends in similar fashion fall victim to the maliciousness of a tranny. These people are mentally imbalanced, which should be an obvious take on anyone who wants to wear a dress and mutilate appendages. It's best to stay away from them. They're treacherous and looking for prey.

I was talking about lesbians and transmen. Did you even read my post? I never mentioned male to female trannies.

Wrong basket. All transgenders are nuts and should be in the same basket, but homosexuals have a close to normal distribution of sanity and insanity and shouldn't be put in the same basket. The gay women I know, who are close family friends, are a picture of level headedness. It isn't fair to lump them in with tranny nutbags.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

What is very funny is that the runaway lesbian says that she should keep child because she gave birth to it. But according to the courts the other lesbian has equal rights to the child by law. Now the runaway claims that's all "politically correct" talk and shouldn't be respected. But for Christ's sake, her marriage to another woman and the child being legally both of theirs' is all due to politically correct laws on same sex marriages in the first place! In other words, if not for politically correct laws she would never have been allowed to marry another woman anyway!

I think true adoptions and blended families are exceptionally rare. Nobody loves a kid that didn't come from their loins and when the shit hits the fan, everyone retreats to biological relations only. Everything else is a fantasy

I grew up in a really dysfunctional family with lots of alcohol, drugs, divorce, abuse, and probably a personality disorder or two. It has taken me many years to work my way from the traumas and distorted understanding of relationships that resulted from such an upbringing.

Your worldview is just as distorted as mine was a teenager. I hope Christ can help you see the world in a better, more humane, and loving way.

Please don't enlist Christ in your vain, ignorant opinions. I'm sure he's not taking sides. Everyone has different life experiences that shape their world view. Not everyone wants to go along with the lie that adoption is always a wonderful and selfless act and the victims of adoption had better be grateful OR ELSE. You're an ass who lacks the humility to know just how little you really know and you're even more of an ass to claim Jesus validates your ignorance.

 

[Pop23]

The reply button is your friend. Let's folks know what the hell your doing.

But then again, I don't run from my own challange as you have demonstrated you do.

Obviously you saw where it was headed.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

The number is easy to determine. As of today, while I don't have the exact number in front of me, it's over 50 million since 1973.

And just what is "it's" being now?

In your vacant mind?

Over 50 million abortions since 1973. Do you deny that fact?

What fact? You haven't said what the hell you are talking about.

Not yet.

YOU referenced abortion in your post above and said it was an indeterminate number. I said it was over 50 million since 1973. Do you deny that it is?

No with your complete lack or reading comprehension, you should always take time before you post to go back and read.

I said the number of women who abort for the following reason was "indetermate": Because they might end up not wanting the child, and they go ahead with an abortion, because of the complete lack of good adoption agencies.

Really? So all those pro life ministries with toll free numbers to help pregnant women struggling don't help them access adoption services? It sounds like you're just making it up as you go along.

 

[GLASNOST]

The reply button is your friend. Let's folks know what the hell your doing.

But then again, I don't run from my own challange as you have demonstrated you do.

Obviously you saw where it was headed.

Thanks for sharing.

 

[The Great Goose]

I met a transman who came between a man and the pregnant mother of his child. He spent seven years with the woman and the child.

Eventually the guy managed to save the woman. The transman wanted custody of the child. The court ended up giving him a two week block every year. The child calls him dad apparently.

He also killed his cat and blamed the neighbour's dog. So chased that neighbour away. They had to sell up and leave, eventually. Obviously he had divided the community against them.

To give a small example, once he offered me a potato scallop. He knew I couldn't eat chicken salt. After I ate it, he casually said, "oh that had chicken salt"

I said, " now I'll be sick for 3 days". He just looked at be with a bitchy nonchalant, complacent face and shrugged.

So anyone who thinks transmen and lesbians aren't dangerous, have conversation with the poor chap who lost his baby through the formative years. So pointless, such a waste.

I've had friends in similar fashion fall victim to the maliciousness of a tranny. These people are mentally imbalanced, which should be an obvious take on anyone who wants to wear a dress and mutilate appendages. It's best to stay away from them. They're treacherous and looking for prey.

I was talking about lesbians and transmen. Did you even read my post? I never mentioned male to female trannies.

Wrong basket. All transgenders are nuts and should be in the same basket, but homosexuals have a close to normal distribution of sanity and insanity and shouldn't be put in the same basket. The gay women I know, who are close family friends, are a picture of level headedness. It isn't fair to lump them in with tranny nutbags.

You've got a vagina, mate.

 

[Pop23]

The reply button is your friend. Let's folks know what the hell your doing.

But then again, I don't run from my own challange as you have demonstrated you do.

Obviously you saw where it was headed.

Thanks for sharing.

Thanks for running

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

And just what is "it's" being now?

In your vacant mind?

Over 50 million abortions since 1973. Do you deny that fact?

What fact? You haven't said what the hell you are talking about.

Not yet.

YOU referenced abortion in your post above and said it was an indeterminate number. I said it was over 50 million since 1973. Do you deny that it is?

No with your complete lack or reading comprehension, you should always take time before you post to go back and read.

I said the number of women who abort for the following reason was "indetermate": Because they might end up not wanting the child, and they go ahead with an abortion, because of the complete lack of good adoption agencies.

Really? So all those pro life ministries with toll free numbers to help pregnant women struggling don't help them access adoption services? It sounds like you're just making it up as you go along.

Of course, there are a small number of women, finding the correct organization or private agency, who have an easier time with it. However, how many can that be? I was obviously talking about the other 150 million or so women in our country. Just how many women can they handle. Surely not enough to make a huge difference,.

 

[GLASNOST]

You've got a vagina, mate.

 

[aris2chat]

That's now how you decide what is or is not constitutional.

It's how the Constitution decides. Try reading the 10th Amendment.

LMAO, try reading a Supreme Court opinion. I know, I know, it's WAY harder than your trusty pocket constitution you got at a Ron Paul rally, but it's ACTUAL law.

Hint: Three-Fifths clause is out.

Try reading the Constitution. You've admitted the word abortion is not there.

start with the life liberty and pursuit of happiness of the woman who does not want or is not ready to be a mother yet, not the life that has not developed or been born yet.

Childbirth is risky and not all women are willing to take the time or the risk to have a child. In a choice, I married my spouse, not some future infant, spouse over fetus, nearly came to that twice. In an ER, the woman's life is priority over fetus. If the fetus is not at least 7mo there is little chance of healthy survival. yes there have been a few cases but far from the norm.

For the christians............an infant has to be a month after birth before it is of value. Even today infants die for many nearly unpreventable reasons, if they make it past childbirth. Having an abortions were not illegal till the 16th C. Performing them in some cases was seen by "radicals" as witchcraft. For those of other faiths most allow or have no view on abortions.

This objection on religious or moral grounds is bunk. It is men's ways of enslaving women and having superiority over them. Choice does not mean a woman must have an abortion, it just says they have the freedom to make that decision if it is right for them. Early home abortions, naturally or chemically should be a first options and clinical/surgical only if the first attempts fail or the woman's life is at risk.

Anyway you look at it, it is none of your damn business unless you are the woman making the choice.

Life style, sexual orientation, who someone falls in love with or has sex with is not either as long as it is consensual

The only sex life you control is your own, keep you big nose to yourself

"For the Christians . . . an infant has to be a month after birth before it is of value"

That is an absolutely retarded statement.

When a woman makes the choice to have a child that she then can't support, why does it become the responsibility of those she told to butt out of her choice to support that child for her financially? If the choice is her, the responsibility is hers, as well. If she can't support the choice she made, tough shit. When you "it's her body" people start abiding by that mindset, tell me.

And if it be from a month old even unto five years old, then thy estimation shall be of the male five shekels of silver, and for the female thy estimation shall be three shekels of silver. -- Leviticus 27:6

Number the children of Levi after the house of their fathers, by their families: every male from a month old and upward shalt thou number them. And Moses numbered them according to the word of the LORD. -- Numbers 3:15-16

As for the killing of a fetus

>>
God sometimes approves of killing fetuses.



And Moses said unto them, Have ye saved all the women alive? ... Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him. -- Numbers 31:15-17
(Some of the non-virgin women must have been pregnant. They would have been killed along with their unborn fetuses.)


Give them, O LORD: what wilt thou give? give them a miscarrying womb and dry breasts. -- Hosea 9:14


Yea, though they bring forth, yet will I slay even the beloved fruit of their womb. -- Hosea 9:16


Samaria shall become desolate; for she hath rebelled against her God: they shall fall by the sword: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up. -- Hosea 13:16


God sometimes kills newborn babies to punish their parents.


Because by this deed thou hast given great occasion to the enemies of the LORD to blaspheme, the child also that is born unto thee shall surely die. -- 2 Samuel 12:14


God sometimes causes abortions by cursing unfaithful wives.


The priest shall say unto the woman, The LORD make thee a curse and an oath among thy people, when the LORD doth make thy thigh to rot, and thy belly to swell. And this water that causeth the curse shall go into thy bowels, to make thy belly to swell, and thy thigh to rot: And the woman shall say, Amen, amen. ...
And when he hath made her to drink the water, then it shall come to pass, that, if she be defiled, and have done trespass against her husband, that the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter, and her belly shall swell, and her thigh shall rot: and the woman shall be a curse among her people. And if the woman be not defiled, but be clean; then she shall be free, and shall conceive seed. -- Numbers 5:21-21, 27-28


God's law sometimes requires the execution (by burning to death) of pregnant women.


Tamar thy daughter in law hath played the harlot; and also, behold, she is with child by whoredom. And Judah said, Bring her forth, and let her be burnt. -- Genesis 38:24<<

​

 

[aris2chat]

Except the man, too, took out the loan.

Where are his payments?

The man is told what the woman does with her body is her choice and no one else's business.

When the sperm donor doesn't pay and the mother can't pay, why are the payments to support someone else's kid placed on the backs of those that didn't take out the loan? In other words, why is the responsibility of supporting the kids of a woman who says what she does with her body placed on those unassociated with the situation when she can't pay?

Sperm banks are not free, they cost around $1000. Some get a friend to donate sperm, in a cup instead.

Eggs can cost well in the $10-20,000 range

Adoptions can cost $25-50,000 after a back ground and financial check

Parents should be ready to be parents not just by accident.

I wasn't referring to a sperm bank. The use of "sperm donor" refers to the male half of the two that created a child then runs away from his responsibility to support that child. In many of those cases, the ONLY association the baby daddy has with the child is during conception.

one man, one shot, millions of sperm, only one needed. If not for the pleasure of sex, 90% of the males could be gelded on a practical level and woman can choose when she is ready.

Now if he male pill was mandatory and both had to sign a contract before a woman permits the man's dose to be withheld................... Power to the women

If she chooses to do what it takes to get pregnant, she's saying she is ready.

Sex is a healthy part of life but some people are not ready to have a family till they are in their late twenties or thirties after they have a good job and home and more mature. Some wait till their early forties even. Why is it wrong to wait? Not everyone is ready in their teens and early twenties to be a mother when they are still learning to be an adult and manage their own life.

Then there are some who are not suited to have children at all.

Not your life, not your decision, not your business

It is what is right for the woman at that time in her life.

Since you should not have access to her medical records, you should not even know what her choice is.

If she has a home abortions you can not even have medical records or proof she did not have a a natural miscarriage, if that.

How do you know what she eats or drinks, normal food in any grocery store?

How do you know what pills or combo she takes with her daily vitamins or powders she adds to her smoothies? What bitter water she drinks?

None of your business

 

[Moonglow]

A married lesbian couple broke up in Canada recently. Suddenly one of them took 'their' children and went on the lam, left the country. What's funny is that she is quoted as saying, "‘At some point the system needs to look at the straight facts and see that (the child) is better off with me."

One needs to look at the straight facts, is it? Seems to me that if she'd looked at the straight facts from the start, she wouldn't be in this predicament.

Lesbian mother from South Tyneside left her wife and 'abducted' their daughter | Daily Mail Online

Oh dear gawd!!! They is just like straight folks....

 

[aris2chat]

Difference is regardless of which parent the child goes with, it's a biological parent.

Are you a birther, a mind reader or the IRS? Were you a witness to the birth, serious question?

Don't have to be any of those or have witnessed it to know what I said is true based on the statement to which I responded. I'll explain but you'll need to pay attention.

When a couple gives birth to a child and that couple is male/female, the child is biologically both of theirs. If they split up for whatever reason and the child goes with one of those two, that child is with a biological parent. If it's a lesbian couple, ONLY one of them can actually be the biological parent although they may call the child theirs. That's simple biology that most people learn at a young age.

Have you ever heard of paternity suits or claims, retard?

There isn't a male in the a lesbian couple, retard.

You REALLY are a dolt or ding-a-ling. Neither partner in a lesbian relationship ever sleeps around with...













MEN

In a straight marriage.............neither partner ever sleeps around with the opposite or same sex?????

I personal don't believe we are designed to be monogamous our whole lives unless we get very lucky and find that right one.....even then our eyes still like to look

 

[AZGAL]

Where are all the New Testament quotes. We only borrow from the Old Teatament unless it involves Jewish heritage and Rabbis.