Lets get one thing straight

[S.J.]

Still waiting.

You can't discriminate due to religion DUHHHHH. Thank god for the constitution- to protect us from brainwashed functional hater morons like you. Breaking for dupes: Obama ALREADY hade a moratorium and fixed the vetting system in 2015- Vetting has ALREADY been extreme since then. Add to it maybe but stop believing your own hate/bs propaganda.

I don't want your opinion, I want you to cite the Constitution, dupe.

 

[S.J.]

Still waiting.

Who is Responsible for U.S. immigration policy?

Still waiting.

 

[BULLDOG]

Still waiting.

Who is Responsible for U.S. immigration policy?

Still waiting.

Those red letters represent a link to your answer. Get someone to help you read it.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

We're still not free from political correctness. We need to either acknowledge that it's MUSLIMS who should be detained (no matter what country they come from) or just put a halt to immigration period.

That's unconstitutional, dingbat dupe.

No non-citizen has a right to come into this country unless we give them permission. The Constitution does not require us to let ANYONE in we don't want in and the president has the power to make that decision, dupe.

No. Actually, our laws make that decision.

The Constitution IS the law, dumbass. And where, in the Constitution does it say any non-citizen has a right to come into this country?

It doesn't.

 

[bendog]

Donald Trump's EO is clearly not a "Muslim ban," because so many Muslim countries are excluded from it. If anything, it is a ban of Muslims from the most dangerous countries, just seven of them if memory serves. This is not the same thing as a Muslim ban per se.

Then again liberals and their media propagandists don't care about any inkling of truth.

The problem is he initially wanted and called for a Muslim ban. So is this just as much as he dared try to get away with or is there actually any real security issue?

Even Yoo is skeptical.

Even though his executive order halting immigration from seven Muslim nations makes for bad policy, I believe it falls within the law,” he continued. “But after the order was issued, his adviser Rudolph Giuliani disclosed that Mr. Trump had initially asked for ‘a Muslim ban,’ which would most likely violate the Constitution’s protection for freedom of religion or its prohibition on the state establishment of religion, or both — no mean feat.”
‘Torture Memos’ author John Yoo thinks Trump has gone too far

 

[S.J.]

Still waiting.

Who is Responsible for U.S. immigration policy?

Still waiting.

Those red letters represent a link to your answer. Get someone to help you read it.

The link does not cite the Constitution saying we are obligated to let any non-citizen into this country. Try again, loser.

 

[BULLDOG]

Still waiting.

Who is Responsible for U.S. immigration policy?

Still waiting.

Those red letters represent a link to your answer. Get someone to help you read it.

The link does not cite the Constitution saying we are obligated to let any non-citizen into this country. Try again, loser.

Dumb ass. Lots of things aren't specifically mentioned in the constitution, but the SC has found they are covered by it.

 

[S.J.]

Still waiting.

Who is Responsible for U.S. immigration policy?

Still waiting.

Those red letters represent a link to your answer. Get someone to help you read it.

The link does not cite the Constitution saying we are obligated to let any non-citizen into this country. Try again, loser.

Dumb ass. Lots of things aren't specifically mentioned in the constitution, but the SC has found they are covered by it.

Then give us a link to the SC saying we are obligated to let a non-citizen into this country, according to the constitution... dumbass.