Catsnmeters
Gold Member
- Sep 19, 2022
- 16,992
- 6,499
No I'm not, liar.You're calling Devon a liar.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No I'm not, liar.You're calling Devon a liar.
Prove it.Probably because you were misquoting him.
He is a Demorat nothing that comes out of his mouth is truthRep. Dan Goldman was present at the testimony. It was his assertion that they didnt discuss business.
But the only way to know for sure it to have a transcript of the testimony.
Yes, you are a liar.No I'm not, liar.
Yawn...your trolling is boring.Yes, you are a liar.
Joe was present or on the phone for over 20 meetings with Hunter's business partners according to Devon Archer. You're a liar.Yawn...your trolling is boring.
Sorry your big meeting helped prove joe didn't discuss business dealings.
Maybe the dead and resurrected Chinese spy will work out better.
Have a great day.
Repost what you said and my response.Prove it.
No.Repost what you said and my response.
And according to Devon, no business was discussed.Joe was present or on the phone for over 20 meetings with Hunter's business partners according to Devon Archer. You're a liar.
Lie. He never said that.And according to Devon, no business was discussed.
Are you daft?
OK liar.
That is what Goldman said and nobody has refuted it.Lie. He never said that.
"The DOJ can indict a ham sandwhich."You know he cant legally do that, right?
Not at the Presidents direction. Open a book.The DOJ can indict a ham sandwhich.
Dont lecture me about weaponizing the DOJ. We will demand revenge for it from whomever our candidate is, and they will give it.Not at the Presidents direction. Open a book.
So now you admit Devon never said it. Get the fuck out of here, liar.That is what Goldman said and nobody has refuted it.
So you'll turn around and weaponize the DOJ even though you believe it shouldnt be weaponized against you. That makes perfect sense.Dont lecture me about weaponizing the DOJ. We will demand revenge for it from whomever our candidate is, and they will give it.
They already did but Trump obesity is not relevant."The DOJ can indict a ham sandwhich."
Your denial that its happening is precisely why it needs to be done to your party next. Until you admit its a problem, your party wont work with us to ensure there are safeguards in place so that it never happens again.So you'll turn around and weaponize the DOJ even though you believe it shouldnt be weaponized against you. That makes perfect sense.
He actually looks more like a yam then a ham sandwich.They already did but Trump obesity is not relevant.