Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When you have principles, you don’t have to draw arbitrary lines. The arbitrary nature simply allows you to force your will on others.The whole process of a society is to draw lines on differing opinions and allowable behavior.
The cake is part of the SSM process, a process the people in question do not believe in.
No, we can't. But we can't just ignore free exercise entirely and force people to do things they don't want to do.
When you have principles, you don’t have to draw arbitrary lines. The arbitrary nature simply allows you to force your will on others.
The cake is not part of the “process”. That’s ridiculous.
I bet you’re one of those guys that thinks the government can force social media companies to carry content they don’t like.
“It’s different” because it’s what you want.And absolutism allows you to think you have to get 100% of everything to get your way.
It is according to the person making and selling it under contract for explicitly a Same Sex Marriage.
in the social media case it would either require the government to force them to hold up to their terms of service, which all claim they are open platforms, or declare certain social media formats a digital commons.
The social media argument is different from this due to the nature of social media holding and fermenting public discourse in the modern world, something a wedding doesn't do.
Your example was absurd, but it didn't provde any information on my remark.We force them to do things with a compelling government interest, and sorry, but a gay couple having to spend 10 minutes finding another contracted baker isn't compelling enough to allow government to ruin the baker "or else".
We force people not to murder people without consequences. Just showing the idiocy of your argumentum ad absurdum on the concept of use of force.
We force them to do things with a compelling government interest, and sorry, but a gay couple having to spend 10 minutes finding another contracted baker isn't compelling enough to allow government to ruin the baker "or else".
Well, she has me on ignore since I spanked her over a particularly racist screed against Muslims that I debunked.I noticed the OP hasn't responded...
crickets of course.
Muslims aren't trying to roll back reproductive rights and gay rights.Guarantee you they would not do the same if it were a Muslim group.
Muslims aren't trying to roll back reproductive rights and gay rights.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Muslims aren't trying to roll back reproductive rights and gay rights.
Lol!!!
Are you here all week?
Point out where they are trying to do so in this country.
Thanks.
Hey what happened to "Bake the Cake"?
I wonder if they would serve a group of Muslims that came in? I'm guessing yes, because that's different.
Right now, that ship has sailed legally. The courts have said that the baker has the right to refuse service. Same with this restaurant.Waiting to hear from those I know wanted to force the baker to "bake the cake".....
Crickets, of course. They spew hypocrisy like they breathe
What the Supreme Court is doing is allowing business to discriminate against gays while hiding behind claims of religious belief and now “artistic freedom”
What is surprising is that they are willing to have this discrimination only apply to gay marriage and not race, religion or political affiliation
There are many passages in the Bible that people violate. Is the Supreme Court willing to enforce those too?
