jillian
Princess
People don't choose being attracted to more than one person either. Is that also a genetic predisposition? People don't choose being attracted to one's sibling either. Is that also a genetic predisposition? What's to stop polygamy and incest from being legalized as well....using that logic?
Law is inherently discriminatory in nature. Nothing wrong with that. For example, we discriminate against thieves and jaywalkers. Discrimination in and of itself is not wrong. You are just throwing around a political PC word that is supposed to elicit a pavlovian response.
If 4 judges can "interpret" the law based on zilch....like flimsy feelings about "honor" and "respect"....think what they could "interpret" next....
Are you suggesting that homosexuals be celebate because you don't approve of what they are? I don't think that's very reasonable.
Frankly, I've already said, between consenting ADULTS, I really don't care about polygamy one way or the other. And you go far afield when you start talking about incest, etc. Those subjects aren't relevant.
the law was interpreted based on the equal protection clause of the california constitution. do you think there's an exact measurement for that any more than there is about what constitues a "well regulated miliitia"?
Law discriminates against behaviors.... not people. I have always thought there was a major problem with a couple who had been together for decades being denied rights that another couple had after 1 minute, just because one is homosexual and the other not.
Don't you see something wrong with that?