Liberal Judge Rules In Favor Of Racism

[rightwinger]

Harvard is an elite school.
They can make their own rules

If they decide they don’t want a student body comprised of wealthy, white alumni spawn and Asians they can expand their criteria

They can consider economic background, community involvement, disabilities, nationality or any other factor

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Shocker, huh?

Obama-appointed judge rules discrimination against one race just peachy keen.


1. "Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
The ruling came just shy of a year after the judge heard three weeks of trial testimony in Boston. Harvard’s admissions dean and other witnesses defended the university against a lawsuit alleging the school imposed a penalty on Asian-American applicants by holding them to a higher standard than applicants of other races.

The lawsuit, filed in 2014 by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair Admissions, accused the university of engaging in “racial balancing” and limiting the number of Asian-American applicants who are admitted. The group is led by conservative legal activist Edward Blum, who spearheaded a similar lawsuit against University of Texas-Austin that reached the Supreme Court. It also has a case pending against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill."
Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional


"Harvard University’s undergraduate admissions process doesn’t intentionally discriminate against Asian-American applicants, a federal judge ruled, ..."





2. "Admissions records at Harvard and other elite colleges over the past quarter-century reveal an uncannily similar treatment of Asian-Americans. Asians, of course, have often been termed the “New Jews” in reference to their focus on academic achievement. But as Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Golden observed in a chapter with that title in his 2006 book The Price of Admission: How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges—and Who Gets Left Outside the Gates, this status has also meant “inheriting the mantle of the most disenfranchised group in college admissions. The nonacademic admissions criteria established to exclude Jews, from alumni child status to leadership qualities, are now used to deny Asians.”


To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply




3. Just one more proof of Rule #2
Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.



The only racists are on the Left, and vote Democrat.

Proof abounds.

Anyone who demands racial discrimination in education and/or employment is against civil rights
Democrats do not actually believe in civil rights.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Harvard has every right to try and diversify their student body. Asians do get into Harvard but all Asians do not. You are the wolf crying racism

Rejecting someone because they are the "wrong" race is racism, plain and simple. Not sure why this needs to be explained, particularly to the very people who keep screaming for a color blind society, yet continue to do everything in their power to stop us from achieving that.

Harvard can’t build a diverse student body if it wants to?

Then they and their graduates need to let go of calling themselves an elite school for the smartest among us to what they are. An SJW melting pot of mediocrity.

Harvard can be diverse and still be elite

There is more to life than GPA and SAT

That’s not even scientifically sound. You can never get an absolute equal number of any race into the elite echelon of anything. What you have at Harvard is the exact opposite of MLK’s dream.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Want to see how elite these schools are? Watch this.

Tucker Carlson: How Did CNN's Chris Cuomo Get Into Yale?

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Harvard is an elite school.
They can make their own rules

If they decide they don’t want a student body comprised of wealthy, white alumni spawn and Asians they can expand their criteria

They can consider economic background, community involvement, disabilities, nationality or any other factor

And if that is racist and unfair...it's O.K.

We get it.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Harvard is an elite school.
They can make their own rules

If they decide they don’t want a student body comprised of wealthy, white alumni spawn and Asians they can expand their criteria

They can consider economic background, community involvement, disabilities, nationality or any other factor

It’s not an elite school. As a matter of fact you have an assembly of well connected mixed in with intellectual welfare recipients.

Knowing how this works I would take an Asian State school kid over a black from Harvard any day.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

The list of everything the left touches it destroys expands by one more thing. Harvard.

 

[rightwinger]

Harvard has every right to try and diversify their student body. Asians do get into Harvard but all Asians do not. You are the wolf crying racism

Rejecting someone because they are the "wrong" race is racism, plain and simple. Not sure why this needs to be explained, particularly to the very people who keep screaming for a color blind society, yet continue to do everything in their power to stop us from achieving that.

Harvard can’t build a diverse student body if it wants to?

Then they and their graduates need to let go of calling themselves an elite school for the smartest among us to what they are. An SJW melting pot of mediocrity.

Harvard can be diverse and still be elite

There is more to life than GPA and SAT

That’s not even scientifically sound. You can never get an absolute equal number of any race into the elite echelon of anything. What you have at Harvard is the exact opposite of MLK’s dream.

Have you ever been to Harvard?
Who said they want an absolute equal distribution of races?

They may even want redneck hillbillies to please conservatives

 

[rightwinger]

Harvard is an elite school.
They can make their own rules

If they decide they don’t want a student body comprised of wealthy, white alumni spawn and Asians they can expand their criteria

They can consider economic background, community involvement, disabilities, nationality or any other factor

It’s not an elite school. As a matter of fact you have an assembly of well connected mixed in with intellectual welfare recipients.

Knowing how this works I would take an Asian State school kid over a black from Harvard any day.

Their alumni do quite well

Our last President was even an alumni

 

[Rustic]

Shocker, huh?

Obama-appointed judge rules discrimination against one race just peachy keen.


1. "Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
The ruling came just shy of a year after the judge heard three weeks of trial testimony in Boston. Harvard’s admissions dean and other witnesses defended the university against a lawsuit alleging the school imposed a penalty on Asian-American applicants by holding them to a higher standard than applicants of other races.

The lawsuit, filed in 2014 by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair Admissions, accused the university of engaging in “racial balancing” and limiting the number of Asian-American applicants who are admitted. The group is led by conservative legal activist Edward Blum, who spearheaded a similar lawsuit against University of Texas-Austin that reached the Supreme Court. It also has a case pending against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill."
Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional


"Harvard University’s undergraduate admissions process doesn’t intentionally discriminate against Asian-American applicants, a federal judge ruled, ..."





2. "Admissions records at Harvard and other elite colleges over the past quarter-century reveal an uncannily similar treatment of Asian-Americans. Asians, of course, have often been termed the “New Jews” in reference to their focus on academic achievement. But as Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Golden observed in a chapter with that title in his 2006 book The Price of Admission: How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges—and Who Gets Left Outside the Gates, this status has also meant “inheriting the mantle of the most disenfranchised group in college admissions. The nonacademic admissions criteria established to exclude Jews, from alumni child status to leadership qualities, are now used to deny Asians.”


To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply




3. Just one more proof of Rule #2
Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.



The only racists are on the Left, and vote Democrat.

Proof abounds.

Political correctness makes people fucking retarded

 

[Rustic]

Shocker, huh?

Obama-appointed judge rules discrimination against one race just peachy keen.


1. "Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
The ruling came just shy of a year after the judge heard three weeks of trial testimony in Boston. Harvard’s admissions dean and other witnesses defended the university against a lawsuit alleging the school imposed a penalty on Asian-American applicants by holding them to a higher standard than applicants of other races.

The lawsuit, filed in 2014 by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair Admissions, accused the university of engaging in “racial balancing” and limiting the number of Asian-American applicants who are admitted. The group is led by conservative legal activist Edward Blum, who spearheaded a similar lawsuit against University of Texas-Austin that reached the Supreme Court. It also has a case pending against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill."
Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional


"Harvard University’s undergraduate admissions process doesn’t intentionally discriminate against Asian-American applicants, a federal judge ruled, ..."





2. "Admissions records at Harvard and other elite colleges over the past quarter-century reveal an uncannily similar treatment of Asian-Americans. Asians, of course, have often been termed the “New Jews” in reference to their focus on academic achievement. But as Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Golden observed in a chapter with that title in his 2006 book The Price of Admission: How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges—and Who Gets Left Outside the Gates, this status has also meant “inheriting the mantle of the most disenfranchised group in college admissions. The nonacademic admissions criteria established to exclude Jews, from alumni child status to leadership qualities, are now used to deny Asians.”


To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply




3. Just one more proof of Rule #2
Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.



The only racists are on the Left, and vote Democrat.

Proof abounds.

What would you have done if you were judge?

Same standard for everybody no matter race and sex.... Anything else is pure racism

 

[Rustic]

Harvard has every right to try and diversify their student body. Asians do get into Harvard but all Asians do not. You are the wolf crying racism

Rejecting someone because they are the "wrong" race is racism, plain and simple. Not sure why this needs to be explained, particularly to the very people who keep screaming for a color blind society, yet continue to do everything in their power to stop us from achieving that.

Harvard can’t build a diverse student body if it wants to?

Then they and their graduates need to let go of calling themselves an elite school for the smartest among us to what they are. An SJW melting pot of mediocrity.

Harvard can be diverse and still be elite

There is more to life than GPA and SAT

Political correctness is not rational thought

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Harvard is an elite school.
They can make their own rules

If they decide they don’t want a student body comprised of wealthy, white alumni spawn and Asians they can expand their criteria

They can consider economic background, community involvement, disabilities, nationality or any other factor

It’s not an elite school. As a matter of fact you have an assembly of well connected mixed in with intellectual welfare recipients.

Knowing how this works I would take an Asian State school kid over a black from Harvard any day.

Their alumni do quite well

Our last President was even an alumni

Yeah and that quota slot showed.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Let me try to explain what Harvard has accomplished here.

Any black graduate will be seen as being 450 points less intelligent than anyone else due to these policies.

A black person with a degree from Harvard should have been impressive. Now it’s not.

Harvard didn’t advance their students. They handicapped the ones they thought they were helping.

 

[busybee01]

Harvard has every right to try and diversify their student body. Asians do get into Harvard but all Asians do not. You are the wolf crying racism

Rejecting someone because they are the "wrong" race is racism, plain and simple. Not sure why this needs to be explained, particularly to the very people who keep screaming for a color blind society, yet continue to do everything in their power to stop us from achieving that.

The fact is that there should be more to college admissions than SAT scores. Wanting a diverse student body is not racism.

 

[busybee01]

Shocker, huh?

Obama-appointed judge rules discrimination against one race just peachy keen.


1. "Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional
The ruling came just shy of a year after the judge heard three weeks of trial testimony in Boston. Harvard’s admissions dean and other witnesses defended the university against a lawsuit alleging the school imposed a penalty on Asian-American applicants by holding them to a higher standard than applicants of other races.

The lawsuit, filed in 2014 by a nonprofit group called Students for Fair Admissions, accused the university of engaging in “racial balancing” and limiting the number of Asian-American applicants who are admitted. The group is led by conservative legal activist Edward Blum, who spearheaded a similar lawsuit against University of Texas-Austin that reached the Supreme Court. It also has a case pending against the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill."
Judge Rules Harvard's Race-Conscious Admissions Policy Constitutional


"Harvard University’s undergraduate admissions process doesn’t intentionally discriminate against Asian-American applicants, a federal judge ruled, ..."





2. "Admissions records at Harvard and other elite colleges over the past quarter-century reveal an uncannily similar treatment of Asian-Americans. Asians, of course, have often been termed the “New Jews” in reference to their focus on academic achievement. But as Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Golden observed in a chapter with that title in his 2006 book The Price of Admission: How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges—and Who Gets Left Outside the Gates, this status has also meant “inheriting the mantle of the most disenfranchised group in college admissions. The nonacademic admissions criteria established to exclude Jews, from alumni child status to leadership qualities, are now used to deny Asians.”


To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply




3. Just one more proof of Rule #2
Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.

2a. If not for double standards Liberals would have no standards at all.



The only racists are on the Left, and vote Democrat.

Proof abounds.

Harvard has every right to try and diversify their student body. Asians do get into Harvard but all Asians do not. You are the wolf crying racism

"An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400–1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply


Bet that sounds fair ....like 'social justice'....to racists like you,






"I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they willnot be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."
Martin Luther King, Jr.

Think he was a Liberal?


I bet you didn't get into Harvard, huh?

Sooo....how was the Robert Fiance School of Cosmetology????

Apparently you want to base admissions on SAT scores only. That is wrong and there is nothing racist about a diverse student body. You are so transparent. Accuse others of what you are. Trump is the one who appeals to white supremacists.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Harvard can’t build a diverse student body if it wants to?

Diversity is only achieved by variations in skin pigmentation?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

The fact is that there should be more to college admissions than SAT scores. Wanting a diverse student body is not racism.

I never said there shouldn't be, but that's a far cry by judging people based on how they look.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Harvard has every right to try and diversify their student body. Asians do get into Harvard but all Asians do not. You are the wolf crying racism

Rejecting someone because they are the "wrong" race is racism, plain and simple. Not sure why this needs to be explained, particularly to the very people who keep screaming for a color blind society, yet continue to do everything in their power to stop us from achieving that.

The fact is that there should be more to college admissions than SAT scores. Wanting a diverse student body is not racism.

You’re an idiot. More diverse is nothing but pure racism.

 

[IM2]

This dumb Asian bitch is just running her mouth with no knowledge of the mother fucking facts.

All Rise!

Today's lesson-

Affirmative Action at Harvard has benefitted Asians.

The honorable IM2, Instructor.

Leaving out recent discoveries of massive cheating by Asians on college entrance exams, the fact is affirmative action policies have benefitted Asians, not hurt them.

17.1 percent of the students at Harvard are Asian. 6.7 percent are black and 10.8 percent Hispanic.

Asians are 4.8 percent of the U.S. population. Based on that Asians, are overrepresented at Harvard while blacks and Hispanics are underrepresented. The lie whites made up which dumb Asian coolies like PC has swallowed is based on a penalty Asians face only compared with whites. Whites are trying to reduce Asian admittance into schools like Harvard and this fool goes right along with it.